Article
A new treatment of radiation behaviour beyond onebody observables
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ndata:07398 05/2008; DOI: 10.1051/ndata:07398
ABSTRACT We propose a new treatment of radiation behaviour in transport calculations by introducing an event generator model in which we combine the nuclear data and the reaction models so as to trace all correlations of ejectiles keeping the energy and momentum conservation in a collision. By this new model, we can estimate the fluctuations around the mean values of onebody observables, for example, the deposit energy distribution in a cell, which cannot be obtained by the transport calculations based on the Boltzmann equation with the nuclear data.

 "Therefore, some particle transport simulation codes employ supplementary algorithms to perform transport calculations based on the crosssection data with conservation of energy and momentum (referred to as the event generator mode, EGM here after). A good example is the EGM of PHITS (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System) [6], which samples the secondary neutron emission angles and energies based on the crosssection data and accordingly balances the energy and momentum through the excitation and recoiling of the residue. However, for reactions emitting more than one secondary particle, the evaporation model was used to sample the second and the subsequent outgoing neutrons in EGM. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A new phenomenological approach is developed to reproduce the stochastic distributions of secondary particle energy and angle with conservation of momentum and energy in reactions ejecting more than one ejectiles using inclusive crosssection data. The summation of energy and momentum in each reaction is generally not conserved in MonteCarlo particle transport simulation based on the inclusive crosssections because the particle correlations are lost in the inclusive crosssection data. However, the energy and angular distributions are successfully reproduced by randomly generating numerous sets of secondary particle configurations which are compliant with the conservation laws, and sampling one set considering their likelihood. This developed approach was applied to simulation of (n,xn) reactions (x Z 2) of various targets and to other reactions such as (n,np) and (n,2nα). The calculated secondary particle energy and angular distributions were compared with those of the original inclusive crosssection data to validate the algorithm. The calculated distributions reproduce the trend of original crosssection data considerably well especially in case of heavy targets. The developed algorithm is beneficial to improve the accuracy of eventbyevent analysis in particle transport simulation. & 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment 07/2014; 763. DOI:10.1016/j.nima.2014.06.088 · 1.32 Impact Factor 
 "However, owing to the approximate treatment of the level structure above the first excitation state, the metastable state is not considered. PHITS [10] adopted a combination of a very simple nuclear deexcitation model and an event generator model [11] prior to this study. An alternative method is to transport particles based on evaluated nuclear data instead of using event generators [12] [13]. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A new theoretical model to simulate gamma deexcitation of excited nuclei, EBITEM (ENSDFBased Isomeric Transition and isomEr production Model), is developed based on the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF), supplementary evaluated data tables, and theories. In the model, reaction products after nucleon evaporation were deexcited by using theoretical calculations if the excitation energy was higher than 3000 keV and the mass number was greater than 40 amu. Otherwise, the nuclei were deexcited based on the scheme provided in the ENSDF. Thus by tracking nuclear deexcitation, production of prompt gammarays and isomers was simulated. The model is applicable for neutron capture products and spallation products of 1071 nuclear species from Li to Bk. Except for some of the light nuclei with discrete level structure, simulated isomer production and prompt gammaray spectra agree generally within 40% and a factor of 3, respectively.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 04/2014; 325:35–42. DOI:10.1016/j.nimb.2014.02.007 · 1.12 Impact Factor  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The fluence to organabsorbeddose and effectivedose conversion coefficients for heavy ions with atomic numbers up to 28 and energies from 1 MeV/nucleon to 100 GeV/nucleon were calculated using the PHITS code coupled to the ICRP/ICRU adult reference computational phantoms, following the instruction given in ICRP Publication 103 (2007 (Oxford: Pergamon)). The conversion coefficients for effective dose equivalents derived using the radiation quality factors of both Q(L) and Q(y) relationships were also estimated, utilizing the functions for calculating the probability densities of absorbed dose in terms of LET (L) and lineal energy (y), respectively, implemented in PHITS. The calculation results indicate that the effective dose can generally give a conservative estimation of the effective dose equivalent for heavyion exposure, although it is occasionally too conservative especially for highenergy lighterion irradiations. It is also found from the calculation that the conversion coefficients for the Q(y)based effective dose equivalents are generally smaller than the corresponding Q(L)based values because of the conceptual difference between LET and y as well as the numerical incompatibility between the Q(L) and Q(y) relationships. The calculated data of these dose conversion coefficients are very useful for the dose estimation of astronauts due to cosmicray exposure.Physics in Medicine and Biology 03/2010; 55(8):223546. DOI:10.1088/00319155/55/8/008 · 2.92 Impact Factor
Similar Publications
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.