Conference Proceeding

Comparing Error Detection Techniques for Web Applications: An Experimental Study

Dep. Eng. Inf., Univ. of Coimbra, Coimbra;
08/2008; DOI:10.1109/NCA.2008.57 ISBN: 978-0-7695-3192-2 pp.144-151 In proceeding of: Network Computing and Applications, 2008. NCA '08. Seventh IEEE International Symposium on
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT Web applications are highly sensitive to the occurrence of user-visible failures. Despite the usage of system-level monitoring tools there are still some application-level errors that escape to those tools and end up to be seen in the Web pages of the final users. Complementary error detection mechanisms should then be used to overcome this problem.In this paper, we present an experimental study where we measured the effectiveness of four different error-detection mechanisms under different fault-load. For the effect we used two benchmarks (JPetstore and TPC-W) and a software fault-injector. The results show that although system-level monitoring tools are very effective in most of the cases, there are other detection mechanisms that present a better latency and coverage when dealing with errors at the application-level. Particularly, the usage of external monitoring schemes seems to be of utmost importance.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
24 Views

Keywords

application-level
 
application-level errors
 
benchmarks
 
Complementary error detection mechanisms
 
different error-detection mechanisms
 
different fault-load
 
experimental study
 
final users
 
problem.In
 
software fault-injector
 
system-level monitoring tools
 
TPC-W
 
user-visible failures
 
utmost importance
 
Web applications
 
Web pages
 

L.M. Silva