Open Versus Arthroscopic Distal Clavicle Resection

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.19). 05/2010; 26(5):697-704. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the available literature in an attempt to compare the outcome of open versus arthroscopic distal clavicle resection in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint pathology.
From January 1966 to December 2008, Medline was searched for the following key words: "acromioclavicular joint arthritis," "acromioclavicular osteolysis," "distal clavicle excision," "acromioclavicular joint excision," "Mumford," and "clavicle." Inclusion criteria included studies that compared the outcome of open versus arthroscopic distal clavicle resection. Studies that could not be translated into the English language or were not published in a peer-reviewed journal were excluded. Data were abstracted from the studies, including patient demographics, surgical procedure, rehabilitation, strength, range of motion, and clinical scoring system.
Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 2 Level II studies, 1 Level III and 14 Level IV studies. Arthroscopic distal clavicle excision results in more "good" or "excellent" outcomes compared with the open procedure. Both arthroscopic techniques result in success rates in excess of 90%, with the direct procedure permitting a quicker return to athletic activities. Performing distal clavicle excision in conjunction with either subacromial decompression or rotator cuff repair also has a high degree of success. A trend toward more "poor" results is seen when distal clavicle excision is performed in patients with post-traumatic acromioclavicular instability or in Workers' Compensation patients.
Our analysis suggests that among patients undergoing distal clavicle excision for acromioclavicular joint pathology, those having an arthroscopic procedure, specifically through the direct approach, can expect a faster return to activities while obtaining similar long-term outcomes compared with the open procedure.
Level III, systematic review.


Available from: Bernard R Bach, May 29, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint arthritis and osteolysis are common causes of shoulder discomfort. The AC joint is subject to large repetitive loads that can cause symptomatic degenerative pathology. The diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint arthritis or osteolysis is made on a history of localized pain to the AC joint, physical examination positive for tenderness at the AC joint and pain with cross body adduction. The diagnosis is confirmed with x-rays and MRI if necessary. Conservative treatment with activity modification, physical therapy, and injections should be initially attempted. If non-operative treatment fails, open or arthroscopic distal clavicle excision is indicated and is successful at relieving symptoms.
    Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine 09/2014; 22(3). DOI:10.1053/j.otsm.2014.03.004 · 0.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Shoulder impingement syndrome and acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis often occur simultaneously and easily missed. Kay et al. reported excellent results with combined arthroscopic subacromial decompression and resection of the distal end of the clavicle in patients with both disorders(1). Arthroscopic treatment of these disorders produces more favourable results than open procedures. We report two patients who were not responding to conservative management and were treated with direct arthroscopic distal clavicle excision and subacromial decompression in single setting. Both patients gained good postoperative outcome in terms of pain score, function and strength improvement assessed objectively with visual analogue score (VAS) and University of California Los Angeles Score (UCLA).
    07/2014; 8(2):59-62. DOI:10.5704/MOJ.1407.007
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint is a frequent cause of shoulder pain and can result in significant debilitation. It is the most common disorder of the acromioclavicular joint and may arise from a number of pathologic processes, including primary (degenerative), posttraumatic, inflammatory, and septic arthritis. Patients often present with nonspecific complaints of pain located in the neck, shoulder, and/or arm, further complicating the clinical picture. A thorough understanding of the pertinent anatomy, disease process, patient history, and physical examination is crucial to making the correct diagnosis and formulating a treatment plan. Initial nonoperative management is aimed at relieving pain and restoring function. Typical treatments include anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, and injections. Patients who continue to exhibit symptoms after appropriate nonsurgical treatment may be candidates for operative resection of the distal clavicle through either open or arthroscopic techniques.
    Southern Medical Journal 05/2014; 107(5):324-329. DOI:10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000101 · 1.12 Impact Factor