Article

DROPOUT: a program to identify problem loci and samples for noninvasive genetic samples in a capture-mark-recapture framework.

Molecular Ecology Notes (Impact Factor: 2.38). 09/2005; DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01038.x
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Genotyping error, often associated with low-quantity/quality DNA samples, is an important issue when using genetic tags to estimate abundance using capture-mark-recapture (CMR). dropout, an MS-Windows program, identifies both loci and samples that likely contain errors affecting CMR estimates. dropout uses a 'bimodal test', that enumerates the number of loci different between each pair of samples, and a 'difference in capture history test' (DCH) to determine those loci producing the most errors. Importantly, the DCH test allows one to determine that a data set is error-free. dropout has been evaluated in McKelvey & Schwartz (2004) and is now available online.

0 Followers
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) in Central Europe have undergone a severe contraction of their range in recent decades with only a few small isolated remaining populations. Here we compare genetic diversity of two contemporary isolated populations (Sallandse Heuvelrug, Netherlands and Lüneburger Heide, Germany) with historical samples from the same region collected within the last one hundred years. We use markers with both putatively neutral and functional variation to test whether the present small and highly fragmented populations hold lower genetic diversity compared to the former larger population. For this we applied three different types of genetic markers: nine microsatellites and 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), both sets which have been found to be neutral, and two functional major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes for which there is evidence they are under selection. The contemporary small isolated populations displayed lower neutral genetic diversity compared to the corresponding historical samples. Furthermore, samples from Denmark showed that this now extinct population displayed lower genetic variation in the period immediately prior to the local extinction. Population structure was more pronounced among contemporary populations compared to historical populations for microsatellites and SNPs. This effect was not as distinct for MHC which is consistent with the possibility that MHC has been subjected to balancing selection in the past, a process which maintains genetic variation and may minimize population structure for such markers. Genetic differentiation among the present populations highlights the strong effects of population decline on the genetic structure of natural populations, which can be ultimately attributed to habitat loss following anthropogenic land use changes.
    Conservation Genetics 04/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10592-014-0610-3 · 1.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We instrumented 36 wolverines (Gate gulo) on 2 study areas in western Montana and one study area on the Idaho-Montana (USA) border: 14 (9 M, 5 F) on the Pioneer study area, 19 (11 M, 8 F) on the Glacier study area, and 3 (2 M, 1 F) on the Clearwater study area. During 2002-2005, harvest from licensed trapping accounted for 9 (6 M, 3 F) of 14 mortalities, including individuals from all 3 study, areas. Based on Akaike's Information Criterion adjusted for small sample sizes (AIC(c)) rankings of 8 a priori models, a trapping model and a trapping-sex interaction model were equally supported (Delta AIC(c) < 2) in explaining wolverine survival. Estimated annual survival was 0.80 when we did not consider harvest, whereas additive mortality from harvest reduced annual survival to 0.57. Glacier National Park in the Glacier study area provided some refuge as evidenced by an annual survival rate of 0.77 compared to 0.51 for the Pioneer Mountain study area. We incorporated these survival rates into a simple Lefkovitch stage-based model to examine rates of population change. The finite rate of population change (?,) for the Glacier study area was 1.1, indicating a stable to slightly increasing population, whereas, for the Pioneer study area was 0.7, indicating a 30% annual population decrease during our study. Changes in, for both study areas were most sensitive to adult survival. In 2004, we used a Lincoln Index to estimate that 12.8 +/- 2.9 (95% CI) wolverines resided in the 4 mountain ranges comprising the Pioneer study area, suggesting that small, island ranges in western Montana supported few individuals. Our results suggest that if wolverines are harvested, they should be managed within individual mountain ranges or small groupings of mountain ranges to limit mortality to within biologically defined limits in recognition of the increased vulnerabilities owing to low fecundity and low population numbers in small mountain ranges. We found that refugia, such as Glacier National Park, were important by reducing trap mortality and providing immigrants to the surrounding population, but even large parks were inadequate to provide complete protection to wolverines from trapping as they ranged outside park borders.
    Journal of Wildlife Management 09/2007; 71(7). DOI:10.2193/2007-053 · 1.61 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
35 Downloads
Available from
Jun 6, 2014