Psychiatric Disorders in Extremely Preterm Children: Longitudinal Finding at Age 11 Years in the EPICure Study

Institute for Women's Health, University College London and the School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 6.35). 05/2010; 49(5):453-63.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for psychiatric disorders in extremely preterm children.
All babies born <26 weeks gestation in the United Kingdom and Ireland from March through December 1995 were recruited to the EPICure Study. Of 307 survivors at 11 years of age, 219 (71%) were assessed alongside 153 term-born classmates. Parents completed a structured psychiatric interview about their child, and teachers completed a corresponding questionnaire from which DSM-IV diagnoses were assigned for 219 (100%) extremely preterm children and 152 (99%) classmates. An IQ test and a physical evaluation were also administered. Longitudinal data were available for extremely preterm children.
Extremely preterm children were more than three times more likely to have a psychiatric disorder than classmates (23% vs. 9%; odds ratio [OR] = 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7, 6.2). Risk was significantly increased for: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; 11.5% vs. 2.9%; OR = 4.3; CI = 1.5 to 13.0), with increased risk for ADHD inattentive subtype (OR = 10.5; CI = 1.4 to 81.1) but not ADHD combined subtype (OR = 2.1; CI = 0.5 to 7.9); emotional disorders (9.0% vs. 2.1%; OR = 4.6; CI = 1.3 to 15.9), with increased risk for anxiety disorders (OR = 3.5; CI = 1.0 to 12.4); and autism spectrum disorders (8.0% vs. 0%; p = .000). Psychiatric disorders were significantly associated with cognitive impairment (OR = 3.5; CI = 1.8 to 6.4). Parent-reported behavioral problems at 2.5 and 6 years were independent predictors of psychiatric disorders at 11 years.
Extremely preterm children are at increased risk for ADHD, emotional disorders, and autism spectrum disorders at 11 years of age. The mechanism of association with psychiatric disorder may include both cognitive impairment and early traumatic experiences that have an impact on both child and parent. Early screening for cognitive and behavioral problems may identify those at greatest risk.

Download full-text


Available from: Dieter Wolke, Jul 07, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    • "Delayed specialization would prolong this process of perceptual narrowing, leading to the prediction that infants who go on to be diagnosed with autism will show an enhanced ability to discriminate faces, phonemes, and voices from unfamiliar categories (e.g., nonnative speakers) in the second year of life and delayed onset of other-race effects. It is interesting that delayed perceptual narrowing has recently been observed in premature infants (Jansson-Verkasalo et al., 2010), a group who have a substantially higher risk of autism (Johnson et al., 2010). Further, a key indicator of the sensitive period for ocular dominance plasticity is the window within which treatments for amblyopia are most effective. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resilience and adaptation in the face of early genetic or environmental risk has become a major interest in child psychiatry over recent years. However, we still remain far from an understanding of how developing human brains as a whole adapt to the diffuse and widespread atypical synaptic function that may be characteristic of some common developmental disorders. The first part of this paper discusses four types of whole-brain adaptation in the face of early risk: redundancy, reorganization, niche construction, and adjustment of developmental rate. The second part of the paper applies these adaptation processes specifically to autism. We speculate that key features of autism may be the end result of processes of early brain adaptation, rather than the direct consequences of ongoing neural pathology.
    Development and Psychopathology 05/2015; 27(02):425-442. DOI:10.1017/S0954579415000073 · 4.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Infants born at\37 weeks gestation are considered preterm and infants born at \32 weeks gestation (approximately 2 % of infants) are considered very preterm. Infants born very preterm are at risk for a range of developmental and behavioural problems later in life including attentional problems, hyperactivity, educational difficulties, externalising behavioural problems and adjustment difficulties (Bhutta 1993; Johnson et al. 2010; Saigal 1991; Stanley et al. 2000). Approximately 10 % of very preterm infants develop major disabilities such as cerebral palsy and 50 % develop intellectual, educational and/or behavioural problems (Stanley et al. 2000). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infants born very preterm are at risk of developmental and behavioural problems and their parents are at risk of psychological distress and compromised parenting. This study has two key aims: (1) to identify, from the parents’ own perspective, the unique aspects of parenting an infant born very preterm and (2) to assess parent preferences for support including opinions of a new, tailored parenting intervention, Prem Baby Positive Parenting Program (Triple P). A qualitative approach was taken with focus groups of 18 parents of infants born preterm and a thematic analysis conducted. Parents identified several unique aspects of parenting an infant born preterm including: difficulty coping with the stress of hospitalisation; institutionalisation to the hospital environment; a lack of preparation for the transition to parenthood; grief; isolation; getting into “bad parenting habits” of overnurturance and a lack of certainty about developmental expectations. Parents preferred parenting support that is tailored to parents of infants born preterm, has flexible delivery, enhances coping skills and the spousal relationship and is sensitive to the emotional context of parenting an infant born preterm. Understanding the experiences and the preferences of parents of infants born preterm is an important step in tailoring parenting interventions to fit their needs.
    Journal of Child and Family Studies 08/2014; 24(5). DOI:10.1007/s10826-013-9762-x · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Examples of potential non-shared environmental factors are epigenetic alterations, infections, nutrition, toxic hazards, neurological injuries, parental treatment, school environments, and peer relations. The most frequently reported environmental risk factors in ADHD, both shared and non-shared, are pregnancy-related such as maternal diabetes (Nomura et al., 2012), viral or bacterial infections (Mann and McDermott, 2011), preterm birth below 26 weeks of pregnancy (Johnson et al., 2010) and low birth-weight (Hultman et al., 2007; Groen-Blokhius et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The study of differences between monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs with respect to ADHD may provide novel leads to disentangle the environmental contribution driving its phenotypes. Objectives: To examine non-shared environmental influences on executive function in dimensionally defined ADHD. Methods: This study included 27 MZ twin pairs (7 female) aged 11–20 years being moderately to substantially discordant for ADHD traits as assessed by the Attention Problem (AP) scale of the Child Behavior Checklist/Adult Behavior Checklist. The twins completed the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) for cognitive flexibility and the Tower Test (TT) for foresighted planning. Two statistical approaches were used to analyze the data. First, correlations between ADHD trait intra-pair differences and WCST and TT scores were calculated. Second, the significance of those intra-pair differences on WCST and TT, using ADHD as categorical variable in clinically discordant pairs, was tested. Results: Both analysing strategies revealed a link between ADHD on one hand, and foresighted planning and inhibitory control on the other hand mediated by non-shared environmental factors. The first statistical approach yielded positive correlations between intra-pairs differences on the AP scale and intra-pair differences on two subscales of the TT: total rule violation (r s 50 . 41) and rule-violation-per-item-ratio (r s 50 . 38). Findings in categorically discordant pairs were consistent, showing within-pair differences on the same subtests (z-1 . 63, P50 . 05, one-tailed and z521 . 60, P50 . 05, one-tailed). Conclusions: Findings confirm previous research suggesting ADHD to be a quantitative extreme on a continuum with executive functions being a cognitive marker of ADHD traits. Non-shared environmental factors appear to influence planning skills and inhibitory control. Introduction Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by motor overactivity, inattention and impulsivity. The defining criteria for ADHD outlined by the recently published 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) include international journal of developmental