Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors Less Than 4 cm in Diameter Resect or Enucleate? A Single-Center Experience

Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Anestesiologiche, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pancreas (Impact Factor: 2.96). 08/2010; 39(6):825-8. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181cf155c
Source: PubMed


Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) are usually small, benign or low-grade malignant, and surgery should preserve the pancreatic parenchyma as much as possible. The aim of the study was to evaluate the postoperative and long-term survival of patients undergoing enucleation in small PETs.
Of 82 patients having PETs, 46 with tumor less than 4 cm in diameter, without distant metastases and with R0 resection by final pathologic examination, were included in this study. Enucleation was performed when the tumor did not involve the main pancreatic duct and in the absence of peripancreatic lymphadenopathy (group A); a typical resection was carried out in all other cases (group B). The 2 groups were compared regarding postoperative mortality and morbidity, pancreatic fistula, postoperative hospital stay, reoperation, World Health Organization classification, TNM stage, recurrence, and long-term survival.
There were 15 patients (32.6%) in group A and 31 (67.4%) in group B. Postoperative and long-term results were similar in the 2 groups, whereas World Health Organization classification was significantly different; enucleation was performed more frequently than typical R0 resection in benign tumors (P = 0.009).
Enucleation should be reserved for patients having benign PETs less than 4 cm in diameter and far from the main pancreatic duct.

Download full-text


Available from: Ricci Claudio, Oct 04, 2015
28 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pancreatic surgery is a technically challenging intervention with high demands for preoperative diagnostics and perioperative management. A perioperative mortality rate below 5% is achieved in high-volume centers due to the high level of standardization in surgical procedures and perioperative care. Besides standard resections, certain indications may require individualized surgical concepts such as tumor enucleations. The aim of the study was to evaluate the indications, technique, and outcome of this limited local approach compared to major resections. Data from patients undergoing pancreatic surgery were prospectively recorded. All patients with tumor enucleations were compared with classical resections (pancreaticoduodenectomy or left resection) in a matched-pair analysis (1:2). Tumor type, localization, operative parameters, complications, and outcome were evaluated. Fifty-three patients underwent pancreatic tumor enucleation between October 2001 and December 2009. Indications included cystic lesions, IPMNs, and neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. Enucleations were associated with shorter operation time, less blood loss as well as shorter ICU and hospital stay compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy and left resections. The overall surgical morbidity of enucleations was 28.3% without major complications. Leading clinical problems were ISGPF type A fistulas (20.8%) requiring prolonged primary drainage. No surgical revisions were necessary, and no deaths occurred. Pancreatic tumor enucleations can be carried out with good results and no mortality. Decisions regarding enucleations are highly individual compared to standard resections, underlining the importance of treatment in experienced high-volume institutions. Enucleations should be carried out whenever possible and oncologically feasible to prevent the typical complications of major pancreatic resection.
    Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery 05/2011; 396(8):1197-203. DOI:10.1007/s00423-011-0801-z · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study outlines the surgical management and clinicopathological findings of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs). There are various surgical options, such as enucleation of the tumor, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, and duodenum-preserving pancreas head resection. Lymph node dissection is performed for malignant cases. New guidelines and classifications have been proposed and are now being used in clinical practice. However, there are still no clear indications for organ-preserving pancreatic resection or lymph node dissection. Hepatectomy is the first choice for liver metastases of well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma without extrahepatic metastases. On the other hand, cisplatin-based combination therapy is performed as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Other treatment options are radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization/embolization, and liver transplantation. Systematic chemotherapy and biotherapy, such as that with somatostatin analogue and interferon-α, are used for recurrence after surgery. The precise surgical techniques for enucleation of the tumor and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy are described.
    Surgery Today 10/2011; 41(10):1332-43. DOI:10.1007/s00595-011-4547-6 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: No abstract available.
    Neuroendocrinology 02/2012; 95(2):98-119. DOI:10.1159/000335591 · 4.37 Impact Factor
Show more