Effects of threat context and cardiac sensitivity on fear responding to a 35% CO2 challenge: a test of the context-sensitivity panic vulnerability model.

Department of Psychology, Laboratory for the Study of Anxiety Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Mail Code A8000, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 2.23). 12/2010; 41(4):365-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.03.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The present study tested several predictions of a context-sensitivity panic vulnerability model emphasizing the interaction between threat context and threat sensitivities. Participants without a history of panic (N=47) completed both global and domain-specific panic relevant sensitivity measures and were then randomized to undergo a 35% CO2 inhalation challenge in the presence or absence of a cardiac defibrillator (threat context). As predicted by the model, cardiac sensitivity (but not trait anxiety or anxiety sensitivity) potentiated the effects of the presence of the defibrillator on CO2 fear responding. Moreover, as predicted by the model, the observed potentiation effects of cardiac sensitivity on CO2 fear responding were mediated by participants' threat appraisals connected to the presence of the defibrillator. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cognitive behavioral theorists have suggested that breathing retraining may be used as a safety behavior. Safety behaviors are acts aimed at preventing or minimizing feared catastrophe and may maintain pathologic anxiety by hindering resolution of maladaptive cognitive processes. An opposing position is that breathing retraining is an effective coping aid. This study examined the safety behavior and coping aid hypotheses as they apply to breathing retraining. Individuals high in fear of respiratory sensations were randomly assigned to a psychoeducation control condition (EDU; n = 27) or a psychoeducation plus breathing retraining condition (EDU + BR; n = 30). As compared to psychoeducation alone, the addition of breathing retraining neither limited improvement of cognitive processes (e.g., anxiety sensitivity) nor added to the gains observed on measures of coping (e.g., perceived control). The findings are evaluated in light of the available literature regarding breathing retraining and the safety behavior and coping aid hypotheses.
    Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 05/2013; 27(2):111-125. DOI:10.1891/0889-8391.27.2.111
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to test how expectations and anxiety sensitivity influence respiratory and autonomic responses to caffeine. The current study investigated the effects of expected vs. unexpected caffeine ingestion in a group of persons prone to the anxiety-provoking effect of caffeine (high anxiety sensitive persons, that is, persons scoring at least one SD above the mean on the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (Peterson and Reiss 1992)) as compared to low-anxious controls. Autonomic arousal (heart rate, skin conductance level), respiratory responding (expired CO2, minute ventilation), and subjective report were assessed in high and low anxiety sensitive participants immediately after beverage consumption and at absorption peak (30 min post-consumption) in four separate sessions during which either coffee (expectation of caffeine) or bitter lemon soda (no expectation of caffeine) was crossed with 4 mg/kg caffeine vs. no drug. High and low anxiety sensitive persons showed comparable autonomic arousal and symptom reports to caffeine which was modulated by expectation, i.e., greater for coffee. Respiratory responding (CO2 decrease, minute ventilation increase) was more accentuated when caffeine was both expected and administered in the low anxiety sensitive group but more accentuated when caffeine was unexpectedly administered in the high anxiety sensitive group. Autonomic arousal and respiratory effects were observable within a few minutes after caffeine administration and were most pronounced at maximum absorption. The results highlight the modulating role of expectancies in respiratory responding to caffeine in low vs. high anxiety sensitive persons and might have important implications for the better understanding of unexpected panic attacks.
    Psychopharmacology 12/2014; DOI:10.1007/s00213-014-3828-3 · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the present vulnerability study individuals with high (n = 35) and low (n = 124) anxiety sensitivity (AS) made ratings of anticipated distress, catastrophic misinterpretations and benign more realistic alternative explanations to 24 hypothetical scenarios involving physical sensations. The physical sensation scenarios were a modification of the Body Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire (Clark et al. in J Consult Clin Psychol 65:203–213, 1997) and varied in level of expectedness across panic-related and nonpanic-related scenarios. Group comparisons revealed that the high AS group reported significantly higher levels of distress and more catastrophic misinterpretations to all physical sensation scenarios, although no group differences were found in ratings of realistic interpretations. A significant Group × Expectedness interaction indicated that high AS individuals generated more catastrophic misinterpretations to all unexpected physical sensation scenarios. The findings support the centrality of catastrophic misinterpretation as the key cognitive construct in panic disorder as well as aspects of Telch et al.’s (J Anxiety Disor 25: 645–653, 2011) context-sensitivity perspective on panic.
    Cognitive Therapy and Research 06/2014; 38(3):343-348. DOI:10.1007/s10608-013-9594-4 · 1.33 Impact Factor


Available from
Sep 29, 2014