Effectiveness of interventions designed to promote patient involvement to enhance safety: a systematic review

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Area 2 Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Quality and Safety in Health Care (Impact Factor: 2.16). 10/2010; 19(5):e10. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032748
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is growing international interest in involving patients in interventions to promote and support them in securing their own safety. This paper reports a systematic review of evaluations of the effectiveness of interventions that have been used with the explicit intention of promoting patient involvement in patient safety in healthcare.
The authors searched Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, HMIC, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-process, PsycINFO and ASSIA to August 2008. We also searched databases of reports, conference proceedings, grey literature, ongoing research and relevant patient safety organisations, and hand-searched two journals. Meta-analysis of the data was not appropriate; therefore, studies were categorised according to how the interventions encouraged patients' actions to improve safety--informing the management plan, monitoring and ensuring safe delivery of treatment (by health professional and by self), making systems safer--and were critiqued in a narrative manner.
The authors identified 14 individual experimental and quasiexperimental studies plus one systematic review. The majority of studies fell into the monitoring and ensuring safe delivery of treatment by self category and were all related to enhancing medication safety. Authors reported improved patient safety incident outcomes for the intervention groups compared with controls where the interventions aimed to encourage patient involvement in: (1) monitoring and ensuring safe delivery of treatment by self (self-management of anticoagulation, 'easy' read information leaflet, nurse-led education to promote self-medication in hospital, patient package insert using lay terminology); (2) informing the management plan/monitoring and ensuring safe delivery of treatment by self (individualised teaching plan by nurse, pharmacist counselling). It was not possible to draw any clear conclusions as to the effectiveness of the interventions (with the exception of one specific aspect of self-medication, that is, self-management of anticoagulation) due to concerns about the methodological quality of the studies.
There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of interventions designed to promote patient involvement on patient safety incidents and in general is poor quality. Existing evidence is confined to the promotion of safe self-management of medication, most notably relating to the self-management of oral anticoagulants.

Download full-text


Available from: Maggie Peat, Aug 15, 2015
  • Source
    • "There was relatively limited emphasis on the impact of safety lapses on the patient and their families, and little or no involvement of patients in the design or delivery of the training. There is an increasing drive to involve patients in safety initiatives (Davis et al. 2007; Peat et al. 2009; Entwistle et al. 2010; Hall et al. 2010). However, recent reviews of the literature have highlighted gaps in our knowledge about the nature and impact of patient involvement. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Training in patient safety is an important element of medical education. Most educational interventions on patient safety training adopt a 'health-professional lens' with limited consideration on the impact of safety lapses on the patient and their families and little or no involvement of patients in the design or delivery of the training. Aims: This paper describes a pilot study to test the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a patient-led educational intervention to facilitate safety training amongst newly qualified doctors. Method: Patients and/or carers who had experienced harm during their care shared narratives of their stories with trainees; this was followed by a focused discussion on patient safety issues exploring the causes and consequences of safety incidents and lessons to be learned from these. Results: The intervention, which will be further tested in an NIHR-funded randomised controlled trial (RCT), was successfully implemented into an existing training programme and found acceptance amongst the patients and trainees. Conclusion: The pilot study proved to be a useful step in refining the intervention for the RCT including identifying appropriate outcome measures and highlighting organisational issues.
    Medical Teacher 03/2013; 35(9). DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2013.778391 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An analytical method for the determination of butyltin compounds in natural and simulated estuarine water using bonded octadecyl silica as a solid phase adsorbent, followed by hydride derivitization and gas chromatography coupled with tin selective flame photometric detection is described. The method is amenable to automation and has detection limits of about 5 ng/L for each of the four butyltin species. Relative standard deviations for eight replicate analyses of samples spiked a 100 ng/L range from 4-20% depending on the butyltin species.
    OCEANS; 10/1987
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, a novel stability robustness test for systems with linear time-varying uncertainties is introduced. The advantages of the stability robustness test lie in the fact that it can cope with multi-input multi-output, stable, or unstable systems whose linear time-varying uncertainties can be represented by a standard structured uncertainty model, and that the implementation of the test is straightforward. The tool used to provide the means of determining system stability robustness is the linear time-invariant ν-gap metric.
    Decision and Control, 2005 and 2005 European Control Conference. CDC-ECC '05. 44th IEEE Conference on; 01/2006
Show more