Dysregulated complement activation as a common pathway of injury in preeclampsia and other pregnancy complications.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Placenta (Impact Factor: 3.29). 07/2010; 31(7):561-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.03.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The complement system protects the host against invading organisms, initiates inflammation and dispose of immune complexes and the products of inflammatory injury. The complement system provides an important link between the innate and adaptive immune systems. Experimental observations suggest that increased complement activation causes and/or perpetuates inflammation during pregnancy. Recent studies suggest a link between complement activation and preeclampsia. Excessive activation or insufficient regulation of complement recruits leukocytes and unleashes potent inflammatory and anti-angiogenic mediators associated with placental insufficiency and maternal endothelial dysfunction characteristic of preeclampsia. We review the animal and human studies that link complement activation and pathogenic events in preeclampsia, present evidence that activation of the complement system is associated with the development of preeclampsia and provides new targets to prevent its complications.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pregnancy morbidity is one of the clinical manifestations used for classification criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). During the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (aPL), a Task Force with internationally-known experts was created to carry out a critical appraisal of the literature available regarding the association of aPL with obstetric manifestations present in actual classification criteria (recurrent early miscarriage, fetal death, preeclampsia and placental insufficiency) and the quality of the evidence that treatment(s) provide benefit in terms of avoiding recurrent adverse obstetric outcomes. The association of infertility with aPL and the effectiveness of the treatment of patients with infertility and positive aPL was also investigated. This report presents current knowledge and limitations of published studies regarding pregnancy morbidity, infertility and aPL, identifying areas that need better investigative efforts and proposing how critical flaws could be avoided in future studies, as suggested by participants of the Task Force. Except for fetal death, there are limitations in the quality of the data supporting the association of aPL with obstetric complications included in the current APS classification criteria. Recommended treatments for all pregnancy morbidity associated to APS also lacks well-designed studies to confirm its efficacy. APL does not seem to be associated with infertility and treatment does not improve the outcomes in infertile patients with aPL. In another section of the Task Force, Dr. Jane Salmon reviewed complement-mediated inflammation in reproductive failure in APS, considering new therapeutic targets to Obstetric APS (Ob APS).
    Autoimmunity reviews 03/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.autrev.2014.02.003 · 7.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies is considered a risk factor for pre-eclampsia. Two meta-analyses and a number of case-control and cohort studies have found associations between pre-eclampsia and lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and/or anti-β2 glycoprotein I. However, existing literature is inconsistent, with varying severity of pre-eclampsia phenotype examined, differing aPL titer cutoffs used to define positive status, and an overwhelming lack of repeat confirmatory aPL testing. This calls into question the link between aPLs and pre-eclampsia, or at least makes it less well defined. There is evidence for a mechanistic pathway between aPLs and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) including pre-eclampsia via the complement pathway. Complement appears to be overactive in pregnancies affected by APOs. A mouse model has show that the fetal wastage caused by treatment with human aPLs can be salvaged by either creating genetic knockouts along the complement, TNF-alpha, and tissue factor pathways or be treating mice with monoclonal antibodies blocking key complement factors. Thus, this is worth further investigation to clarify the likely association of aPLs and pre-eclampsia in humans, as well is to further evaluate the interaction with complement in human pregnancies.
    Lupus 10/2014; 23(12):1229-31. DOI:10.1177/0961203314531347 · 2.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is generally accepted that the development of novel therapies to treat pregnancy-related disorders, such as preeclampsia, is hampered by the paucity of research funding. Hence, it is with great interest to become aware of at least three novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of this disorder: exploiting either the anticoagulant activity of antithrombin, the free radical scavenging activity of alpha-1-microglobulin, or the regenerative capacity of placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells. As these projects are being carried out by small biotech enterprises, the question arises of how they are able to fund such undertakings. A novel strategy adopted by two of these companies is that they successfully petitioned US and EU agencies in order that preeclampsia is accepted in the register of rare or orphan diseases. This provides a number of benefits including market exclusivity, assistance with clinical trials, and dedicated funding schemes. Other strategies to supplement meager research funds, especially to test novel approaches, could be crowdfunding, a venture that relies on intimate interaction with advocacy groups. In other words, preeclampsia meets Facebook. Perhaps similar strategies can be adopted to examine novel therapies targeting either the imbalance in pro- or anti-angiogenic growth factors, complement activation, reduced levels of placenta protein 13, or excessive neutrophil activation evident in preeclampsia.
    02/2015; 2:7. DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2015.00007

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014