Cancer support group participation in the United Kingdom: a national survey.

Macmillan Research Unit, School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Social Work, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, University Place, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Supportive Care in Cancer (Impact Factor: 2.09). 05/2011; 19(5):675-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0887-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Existing data on cancer support groups come largely from small studies in specific geographic areas, particularly in the UK. This study was designed on a national scale to describe the characteristics of support group members and examine associations between group and participant variables and perceived outcomes.
A postal survey of support groups in the UK was performed with group leaders asked to distribute questionnaires to their members. Questionnaires included sections for demographic and medical information, group attendance, perceived outcomes and psychosocial variables.
From an original pool of 2,883 members from 206 groups, a total of 748 patient members within 172 support groups participated. Females comprised 68.2% of the sample, mean age was 65.4 ± 10.2 years, and 73.3% were retired. Post-secondary education was reported by 42.2%, and the proportion living in the two least deprived quartiles was 35.6%. Participants were a mean of 76.5 ± 67.4 months post-diagnosis, with 60.6% in remission. Breast cancer was the most common diagnosis (48.8%). The mean length of membership was 56.0 ± 54.7 months. Frequency of perceived benefits was positively associated with length of membership and attendance record. Psychosocial outcomes did not differ based on group variables.
Support group participants are more often female, white, retired, married and long-term cancer survivors. Contrary to earlier studies, support group members do not tend to have high educational achievements or socioeconomic status. Perceived benefits are highest among long-term members and regular attenders.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives To investigate how comparable outcomes of medical communication research are when using different patient accrual methods by comparing cancer patients organization members with outpatient clinic patients. Methods In an experimental video-vignettes study, the impact of oncologist communication on trust was tested. Background characteristics (socio-demographics, trait anxiety, health locus of control and attachment style), reported trust, and the impact of communication on trust were compared between the two groups. Results Cancer patient organization members (n = 196) were younger and higher educated than clinical patients (n = 148). Members felt more personal control over their health (p < 01) but were also more anxious (p < 05). They reported lower trust in general health care (p < 05), in their own oncologist (p < 001) and in the oncologist in the videos (p < 05). The impact of oncologist communication on trust was similar for both groups. Conclusions Despite considerable differences in trust levels, both groups appear equally affected by oncologist communication. Thus, although including cancer patient organization members may impact the generalizability of some findings, using these participants to investigate communication appears justified. Practice implications Cancer patient organization members may regard their oncologist more critically. Research including both members and patients recruited through hospital clinics could take group membership into account as a possible confounder. Nonetheless, communicating competence, honesty and caring may benefit the relation with these patients similarly as with other patients.
    Patient Education and Counseling 01/2014; · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lung cancer patients and survivors are significantly less likely to use support groups than those with other cancers. In this study, we evaluated the utility and specificity of the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations for modeling intention to participate in face-to-face (F2F) and online lung cancer support groups. Adults diagnosed with lung cancer (n = 230) completed measures assessing predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with intention to use support services. Intention to join a F2F support group (found among 36.4% of survivors) was associated with positive attitude about F2F support groups, fewer perceived time constraints, less travel time from the clinic, and not having enough social support. Intention to join an online support group (34% of survivors) was associated with having more positive attitudes about online support, greater use of avoidance coping strategies, more comfort using computers, and fewer perceived time constraints. Demographics, medical history, health status, and psychological status were not associated with intention to join either type of group. Reducing barriers to participation and addressing attitudes about support services may be the most effective ways to increase utilization of lung cancer support services. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Psycho-Oncology 12/2013; · 3.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in the incidence of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with periampullary cancers and the impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on patient outcomes and to explore predictors of these outcomes. This population-based cohort study retrospectively analyzed 4,039 PD procedures performed from 1998 to 2009. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess the relative change rate. Hierarchical regression models were used to predict these outcomes. The incidence of PDs per 10(5) persons increased from .97 to 1.89, whereas the length of stay and hospital treatment cost declined. Current treatment in a low-volume hospital and current treatment by a low-volume surgeon showed significant positive associations with these outcomes (P < .001). The data indicate that analysis and emulation of the treatment strategies used by high-volume hospitals and high-volume surgeons may reduce overall hospital resource use. Because high-volume hospitals and surgeons consistently achieve superior outcomes of PD, their treatment strategies should be carefully analyzed and emulated.
    American journal of surgery 10/2013; · 2.36 Impact Factor