I'm no longer torn after choice: how explicit choices implicitly shape preferences of odors.

Laboratory for the Study of Emotion Elicitation and Expression, Department of Psychology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Psychological Science (Impact Factor: 4.43). 04/2010; 21(4):489-93. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610364115
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Several studies have shown that preferences can be strongly modulated by cognitive processes such as decision making and choices. However, it is still unclear whether choices can influence preferences of sensory stimuli implicitly. This question was addressed here by asking participants to evaluate odors, to choose their preferred odors within pairs, to reevaluate the odors, and to perform an unexpected memory test. Results revealed, for the first time in the study of olfaction, the existence of postchoice preference changes, in the sense of an overvaluation of chosen odors and a devaluation of rejected ones, even when choices were forgotten. These results suggest that chemosensory preferences can be modulated by explicit choices and that such modulation might rely on implicit mechanisms. This finding rules out any explanation of postchoice preference changes in terms of experimental demand and strongly challenges the classical cognitive-dissonance-reduction account of such preference changes.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To what extent do we know our own minds when making decisions? Variants of this question have preoccupied researchers in a wide range of domains, from mainstream experimental psychology (cognition, perception, social behavior) to cognitive neuroscience and behavioral economics. A pervasive view places a heavy explanatory burden on an intelligent cognitive unconscious, with many theories assigning causally effective roles to unconscious influences. This article presents a novel framework for evaluating these claims and reviews evidence from three major bodies of research in which unconscious factors have been studied: multiple-cue judgment, deliberation without attention, and decisions under uncertainty. Studies of priming (subliminal and primes-to-behavior) and the role of awareness in movement and perception (e.g., timing of willed actions, blindsight) are also given brief consideration. The review highlights that inadequate procedures for assessing awareness, failures to consider artifactual explanations of "landmark" results, and a tendency to uncritically accept conclusions that fit with our intuitions have all contributed to unconscious influences being ascribed inflated and erroneous explanatory power in theories of decision making. The review concludes by recommending that future research should focus on tasks in which participants' attention is diverted away from the experimenter's hypothesis, rather than the highly reflective tasks that are currently often employed.
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 01/2014; · 14.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The free-choice paradigm (Brehm, 1956) is a widely used paradigm in psychology. It has been used to show that after a choice between two similarly pleasant stimuli, the pleasantness of the chosen one tends to increase, whereas the pleasantness of the rejected one tends to decrease-a spreading of alternatives. However, the methodological validity of the free-choice paradigm to study choice-induced preference change has recently been seriously questioned (Chen & Risen, 2010). According to this criticism, the classically reported spreading of alternatives between the first and second rating sessions cannot be unambiguously be interpreted to reflect a true change in preferences, and can be observed even for completely static preferences. Here, we used two measurement sequences, a classical Rating1-Choice-Rating2 sequence and a control Rating1-Rating2-Choice sequence, to disentangle the spreading of alternatives driven by the effect of choice from the artifactual effect highlighted by Chen and Risen. In two studies using different stimulus material (faces and odors), we find that choice has a robust modulatory impact on preferences for rejected odors, but not for chosen odors, and not for faces.
    Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 11/2013; · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this research is to examine in what extent tourists’ preferences, and their satisfaction relates to their purchase intention from a restaurant. The study also considers the mediating role of service quality among the relationships. In order to test the hypothesized model, this study used a sample of 180 tourists’ who were visited in Malaysia. The instruments were developed through the measures adapted from previous scholarly works. In addition, structural equation modeling was applied to test the proposed model. The results show that the relationships among the variables are all significant except one. Moreover, the mediating effect of service quality in between tourists’ preference and purchase intention is partial. On the other hand, the role of service quality as mediator in between the relationship between tourists’ satisfaction and their purchase intention from a restaurant were full rather partial. This study offers valuable insights for restaurant managers to aware of and to deliver consistent and attractive services to their customers by considering their preference and satisfaction through appropriate service quality components. This research contributes to the literature on tourism marketing by examining their preferences and satisfaction in choosing a restaurant. Above all, this research also used service quality as a mediating variable in between the relationship among tourist’s preferences, satisfaction towards their intention to purchase from a restaurant which is scared in the tourism marketing literature under the Malaysian tourism industry context.
    the Tourism and Hospitality International Conference (THIC 2014), Malaysia; 11/2014


Available from
Jan 8, 2015