Article

Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics

Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 04/2010; 5(4):e10272. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010272
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Gene activation is thought to occur through a series of temporally defined regulatory steps. However, this process has not been completely evaluated in single living mammalian cells.
To investigate the timing and coordination of gene activation events, we tracked the recruitment of GCN5 (histone acetyltransferase), RNA polymerase II, Brd2 and Brd4 (acetyl-lysine binding proteins), in relation to a VP16-transcriptional activator, to a transcription site that can be visualized in single living cells. All accumulated rapidly with the VP16 activator as did the transcribed RNA. RNA was also detected at significantly more transcription sites in cells expressing the VP16-activator compared to a p53-activator. After alpha-amanitin pre-treatment, the VP16-activator, GCN5, and Brd2 are still recruited to the transcription site but the chromatin does not decondense.
This study demonstrates that a strong activator can rapidly overcome the condensed chromatin structure of an inactive transcription site and supercede the expected requirement for regulatory events to proceed in a temporally defined order. Additionally, activator strength determines the number of cells in which transcription is induced as well as the extent of chromatin decondensation. As chromatin decondensation is significantly reduced after alpha-amanitin pre-treatment, despite the recruitment of transcriptional activation factors, this provides further evidence that transcription drives large-scale chromatin decondensation.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Susan Janicki, Sep 26, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
131 Views
  • Source
    • "KR or mCherry was amplified by PCR with additional BamHI and EcoRI sites and subcloned into a pBROAD3 tetR-ICP22 NLS vector (22) to yield pBROAD3/tetR-KR and pBROAD3/tetR-mCherry. pBROAD3/TA-KR was made by inserting tetR+VP16 sequences into the AgeI and BamHI sites in pBROAD3/tetR-KR. VP16 sequences were amplified by 5′ TA_AgeI: gcg acc ggt atg gca tct aga tta gat aaa ag and 3′TA+NLS_BamHI: gcg gga tcc cg TAC CTT TCT CTT CTT TTT TGG ATC cgg ccc acc gta ctc gtc aat tc, based on the template of pCherry-TA-ER (23). Human cDNAs containing full-length XRCC1, DNA Polß and PCNA were described before (4). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced DNA damage is repaired by the base excision repair pathway. However, the effect of chromatin structure on BER protein recruitment to DNA damage sites in living cells is poorly understood. To address this problem, we developed a method to specifically produce ROS-induced DNA damage by fusing KillerRed (KR), a light-stimulated ROS-inducer, to a tet-repressor (tetR-KR) or a transcription activator (TA-KR). TetR-KR or TA-KR, bound to a TRE cassette (∼90 kb) integrated at a defined genomic locus in U2OS cells, was used to induce ROS damage in hetero- or euchromatin, respectively. We found that DNA glycosylases were efficiently recruited to DNA damage in heterochromatin, as well as in euchromatin. PARP1 was recruited to DNA damage within condensed chromatin more efficiently than in active chromatin. In contrast, recruitment of FEN1 was highly enriched at sites of DNA damage within active chromatin in a PCNA- and transcription activation-dependent manner. These results indicate that oxidative DNA damage is differentially processed within hetero or euchromatin.
    Nucleic Acids Research 11/2013; 42(4). DOI:10.1093/nar/gkt1233 · 9.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "To generate pCMV-3 × FLAG-GFP-EBNA1-DBD, the GFP coding sequence was excised from p3 × FLAG-GFP-HMGA1a by digestion with HindIII, and the fragment was ligated into HindIII digested p3 × FLAG-EBNA1-ΔGA/GR. Plasmids expressing YFP-GCN5, -CAF, -P300, -Brd2 and -Brd4 (29) were kindly provided by Ilona Rafalska-Metcalf, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA. To generate the pEGFP-USP7 plasmid, the USP7 coding sequence was PCR amplified from the pT7-USP7 plasmid (30) (kindly provided by Roger D. Everett, University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, UK) using the primer pair ‘fw-GTGAAGCTTATGAACCACCAGCAGCAGCAGCAG, rev-GGGACCGGTGGGTTATGGATTTTAATGGCCTTTTC’ and cloned in the HindIII/AgeI restriction sites of pEGFP-N1. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Viral proteins reprogram their host cells by hijacking regulatory components of protein networks. Here we describe a novel property of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA1) that may underlie the capacity of the virus to promote a global remodeling of chromatin architecture and cellular transcription. We found that the expression of EBNA1 in transfected human and mouse cells is associated with decreased prevalence of heterochromatin foci, enhanced accessibility of cellular DNA to micrococcal nuclease digestion and decreased average length of nucleosome repeats, suggesting de-protection of the nucleosome linker regions. This is a direct effect of EBNA1 because targeting the viral protein to heterochromatin promotes large-scale chromatin decondensation with slow kinetics and independent of the recruitment of adenosine triphosphate-dependent chromatin remodelers. The remodeling function is mediated by a bipartite Gly-Arg rich domain of EBNA1 that resembles the AT-hook of High Mobility Group A (HMGA) architectural transcription factors. Similar to HMGAs, EBNA1 is highly mobile in interphase nuclei and promotes the mobility of linker histone H1, which counteracts chromatin condensation and alters the transcription of numerous cellular genes. Thus, by regulating chromatin compaction, EBNA1 may reset cellular transcription during infection and prime the infected cells for malignant transformation.
    Nucleic Acids Research 01/2013; 41(5). DOI:10.1093/nar/gkt032 · 9.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Brief histories of the IEEE Mass Storage System Reference Model and the IEEE Storage System Standards Working Group are presented. The Reference Model is explained in terms of layers of abstraction, including storage-container layers, mapping-service layers, and storage-service layers
    Mass Storage Systems, 1993. Putting all that Data to Work. Proceedings., Twelfth IEEE Symposium on; 05/1993
Show more