Single Cell Analysis of Transcriptional Activation Dynamics

Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 04/2010; 5(4):e10272. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010272
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Gene activation is thought to occur through a series of temporally defined regulatory steps. However, this process has not been completely evaluated in single living mammalian cells.
To investigate the timing and coordination of gene activation events, we tracked the recruitment of GCN5 (histone acetyltransferase), RNA polymerase II, Brd2 and Brd4 (acetyl-lysine binding proteins), in relation to a VP16-transcriptional activator, to a transcription site that can be visualized in single living cells. All accumulated rapidly with the VP16 activator as did the transcribed RNA. RNA was also detected at significantly more transcription sites in cells expressing the VP16-activator compared to a p53-activator. After alpha-amanitin pre-treatment, the VP16-activator, GCN5, and Brd2 are still recruited to the transcription site but the chromatin does not decondense.
This study demonstrates that a strong activator can rapidly overcome the condensed chromatin structure of an inactive transcription site and supercede the expected requirement for regulatory events to proceed in a temporally defined order. Additionally, activator strength determines the number of cells in which transcription is induced as well as the extent of chromatin decondensation. As chromatin decondensation is significantly reduced after alpha-amanitin pre-treatment, despite the recruitment of transcriptional activation factors, this provides further evidence that transcription drives large-scale chromatin decondensation.

Download full-text


Available from: Susan Janicki, Sep 26, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Brief histories of the IEEE Mass Storage System Reference Model and the IEEE Storage System Standards Working Group are presented. The Reference Model is explained in terms of layers of abstraction, including storage-container layers, mapping-service layers, and storage-service layers
    Mass Storage Systems, 1993. Putting all that Data to Work. Proceedings., Twelfth IEEE Symposium on; 05/1993
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During the 1994 SIRC/XSAR mission, part of the scientific activities were devoted to hydrology applications. To complement the shuttle radar data, the helicopter scatterometer ERASME was used on the Orgeval site. As a result, incidence angles ranging from 25° to 57° are available in the C band. Terrain measurements of soil moisture and roughness were also taken. The objective of this study was to take advantage of this data set to improve the geometrical characterization of local soil structure using a fractional Brownian model in order to simulate radar backscattering over agricultural fields. The experimental soil profiles are proved to be locally fractal over a spatial range of a few centimeters (clod structure). The relation between the shape of the correlation function and the fractal dimension is brought to light. A new empirical correlation function is used to adjust the experimental one. It leads to an improvement in the analytic backscattering model Integral Equation Model. Soil profiles, generated with combination between fractional Brownian local structure and global structure with respect to the surface root mean square (rms height) and the correlation length, are used in Moment Method backscattering simulations, which provide results in excellent agreement with radar data.
    Remote Sensing of Environment 07/2000; DOI:10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00082-1 · 6.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired via nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR), but cellular repair processes remain elusive. We show here that the ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factors, ACF1 and SNF2H, accumulate rapidly at DSBs and are required for DSB repair in human cells. If the expression of ACF1 or SNF2H is suppressed, cells become extremely sensitive to X-rays and chemical treatments producing DSBs, and DSBs remain unrepaired. ACF1 interacts directly with KU70 and is required for the accumulation of KU proteins at DSBs. The KU70/80 complex becomes physically more associated with the chromatin-remodeling factors of the CHRAC complex, which includes ACF1, SNF2H, CHRAC15, and CHRAC17, after treatments producing DSBs. Furthermore, the frequency of NHEJ as well as HR induced by DSBs in chromosomal DNA is significantly decreased in cells depleted of either of these factors. Thus, ACF1 and its complexes play important roles in DSBs repair.
    Molecular cell 12/2010; 40(6):976-87. DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.12.003 · 14.46 Impact Factor