Article

Is adjuvant chemoradiotherapy overtreatment in cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors?

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics (Impact Factor: 4.59). 03/2011; 79(3):794-9. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine whether adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves the outcome of cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors.
Between January 2000 and June 2006, the medical records of 735 patients who had undergone radical surgery for Stage IB-IIA cervical cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Of the 735 patients, 172 with two or more intermediate risk factors (i.e., lymphovascular space involvement, deep stromal invasion, and tumor size≥2 cm) were grouped as follows according to the adjuvant treatment received: 34 patients, no further treatment; 49 patients, RT; and 89 patients, CRT. The significance of the clinical parameters and recurrence-free survival of each group were analyzed.
Of the 172 patients with any of the intermediate risk factors, 137 (79.6%) had two or more intermediate risk factors. Of the 172 patients, 12 developed recurrences (6.4%)->(7.0%), with 6 in the pelvis and 6 in distant sites. All 12 recurrences occurred in those who had two or more intermediate risk factors (sensitivity, 100%); however, only six recurrences were detected in patients who met the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria for the intermediate-risk group (sensitivity, 50%; Z test, p<.05). A statistically significant difference was found in the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate among the no further treatment, RT, and CRT groups (67.5%, 90.5%, and 97.5%, respectively; p<.05). The incidence of Grade 3-4 hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities was not significantly different statistically between the RT and CRT groups (6.1% and 13.4%, respectively; p > .05).
Postoperative adjuvant CRT can improve the outcome of cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors, with low increase in toxicity.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
86 Views
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The potential of pine cones as a natural biosorbent was investigated for adsorptive removal of Basic Red 46 (BR 46) from aqueous solutions. Various physico-chemical parameters were studied such as solution pH, biosorbent dosage, biosorbent size, dye concentration, temperature, contact time and ionic strength. The equilibrium data fitted well with the Langmuir isotherm. The monolayer sorption capacity was found as 73.53 mg g−1. Kinetic data were best described by the pseudo-second order model. The thermodynamic studies indicated that the biosorption reactions were spontaneous and endothermic. Activation energy was calculated as 32.33 kJ mol−1. The BR 46 was desorbed from the pine cones with 0.1 M HCl solution. The recovery for the dye was found to be higher than 90%. Thus, this study demonstrated that the pine cones could be used as a low-cost biosorbent for the treatment of the wastewater streams bearing dye.Research Highlights►The monolayer sorption capacity was found as 73.53 mg g−1. ►Kinetic data were best described by the pseudo-second order model. ►The biosorption reactions were spontaneous and endothermic. ►The pine cones as a natural biosorbent may be an alternative to more costly materials.
    Desalination. 01/2011; 270:199-205.
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the long-term clinical outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors. Between 1990 and 2010, 110 cervical cancer patients with 2 or more intermediate risk factors (deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and large tumor size) underwent adjuvant RT (n=56) or CCRT (n=54) following radical surgery. Because CCRT had been performed since 2000, patients were divided into 3 groups regarding treatment period and the addition of chemotherapy, RT 1990-1999 (n=39), RT 2000-2010 (n=17) and CCRT 2000-2010 (n=54). Majority of concurrent chemotherapeutic regimens were carboplatin and paclitaxel (n=48). Five-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates for RT 1990-1999, RT 2000-2010 and CCRT 2000-2010 were 83.5%, 85.6% and 93.8%, respectively. CCRT 2000-2010 had a significant decrease in pelvic recurrence (p=0.012) and distant metastasis (p=0.027). There were no significant differences in overall survival and RFS between RT 1990-1999 and RT 2000-2010. Acute grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities were more frequently observed in CCRT 2000-2010 (p<0.001). However, acute grade 3 and 4 gastrointestinal (GI) and chronic toxicities did not differ between the groups. This study shows that the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to postoperative RT in cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors may improve RFS without increasing acute GI and chronic toxicities, although hematologic toxicities increased significantly.
    Gynecologic Oncology 01/2012; 124(1):63-7. · 3.93 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Platinum-based primary or adjuvant chemoradiation is the treatment of choice for patients with cervical cancer. However, despite national guidelines and international recommendations, many aspects in diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer are not based on valid data. To evaluate the current patterns of care for patients with cervical cancer in Germany, a questionnaire with 25 items was sent to 281 radiooncologic departments and out-patient health care centers. The response rate was 51 %. While 87 % of institutions treat 0-25 patients/year, 12 % treat between 26 and 50 and only 1 % treat more than 50 patients/year. In 2011, the stage distribution of 1,706 treated cervical cancers were IB1, IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIA/IIIB, and IV in 11, 12, 11, 22, 28, and 16 %, respectively. CT (90 %) and MRI (86 %) are mainly used as staging procedures in contrast to PET-CT with 14 %. Interestingly, 27 % of institutions advocate surgical staging prior to chemoradiation. In the majority of departments 3D-based (70 %) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (76 %) are used for percutaneous radiation, less frequently volumetric arc techniques (26 %). Nearly all colleagues (99.3 %) apply conventional fractioning of 1.8-2 Gy for external-beam radiotherapy, in 19 % combined with a simultaneous integrated boost. Cisplatinum mono is used as a radiosensitizer with 40 mg/m(2) weekly by 90 % of radiooncologists. For boost application in the primary treatment, HDR (high-dose rate) brachytherapy is the dominant technique (84 %). In patients after radical hysterectomy pT1B1/1B2, node negative and resection in sound margins adjuvant chemoradiation is applied due to the occurrence of 1-4 other risk factors in 16-97 %. There is a broad spectrum of recommended primary treatment strategies in stages IIB and IVA. Results of the survey underline the leading role but also differences in the use of chemoradiation in the treatment of cervical cancer patients in Germany.
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 07/2013; · 4.16 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
25 Downloads
Available from
Jun 21, 2013