Article

Emerging concepts in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma.

Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, OH 44195, USA.
Advances in anatomic pathology (Impact Factor: 3.1). 05/2010; 17(3):182-6. DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181d97851
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma is a relatively uncommon variant of urothelial carcinoma, but its recognition carries important prognostic and treatment implications. Micropapillary morphology occurs in neoplasms arising in many different organ systems and displays aggressive biologic behavior regardless of its site of origin. On account of this association, micropapillary features in urothelial carcinoma should be reported regardless of whether the pattern is focal or dominant. The overall prognosis for micropapillary urothelial carcinoma is poor and recent studies suggest that early treatment with cystectomy could improve outcome, as these tumors are unlikely to respond to chemotherapy when used as a secondary treatment modality. This review discusses the histologic features required for diagnosis and the clinical significance of rendering a diagnosis of micropapillary urothelial carcinoma.

1 Follower
 · 
87 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Micropapillary carcinoma (MPC) of urinary tract is an uncommon variant of urothelial carcinoma with significant diagnostic and prognostic implications. Though MPC shows characteristic microscopic features, there exists interobserver variability and also it needs to be differentiated from the metastasis from other organs. The prognosis is generally poor, depending on the proportion of the micropapillary component in some reports. Early cystectomy in cases with only lamina propria invasion may be indicated according to recent studies. This review outlines the general features of this entity and briefly comments on the controversies and the recent development.
    Advances in Urology 10/2011; 2011:217153. DOI:10.1155/2011/217153
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) is a rare subtype of urothelial carcinoma (UC) with an aggressive clinical course. The cytomorphologic features of MPUC in urine cytology have not been well described. In this study, 23 urine specimens (11 voided urines and 12 bladder washings) from 23 patients with MPUC on follow-up surgical material and 28 specimens (14voided urines and 14 bladder washings) from 28 patients with high-grade UCs (HGUC) were retrieved. Cytologic features (nuclear grade, cytoplasmic characteristics), architectural features (single cell pattern, true papillary structures, flat sheets/nests, three dimensional clusters, micropapillary (inside-out, acinar-like, or cauliflower with nuclei located peripherally)), and necrosis were evaluated. Clinical follow-up was obtained by chart review. Two findings, micropapillae and cytoplasmic vacuoles, were seen more frequently in MPUC compared to HGUC, 81.0% vs. 14.3%, and 57.1% vs. 14.3%, respectively. The combination of these two findings had a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 86%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a negative predictive value of 83% for the diagnosis of MPUC on subsequent biopsy. MPUC and HGUC can both exhibit a single cell pattern, papillary structures, flat sheets/nests, three dimensional clusters, high-nuclear grade, and necrosis, thus these findings are not useful in distinguishing these entities. Chart review revealed that patients with MPUC had a higher rate of metastasis to lymph nodes and distant organs than HGUC, 57% vs. 4%. Therefore, the findings of cytoplasmic vacuoles and micropapillary structures in UC from a urine cytology specimen are associated with MPUC on subsequent biopsy. Diagn. Cytopathol. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Diagnostic Cytopathology 06/2013; 41(6). DOI:10.1002/dc.22866 · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Noninvasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma consists of slender tufts of urothelial carcinoma lacking fibrovascular cores analogous to ovarian papillary serous tumors of borderline malignancy. Eighteen noninvasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma cases were identified from the Pathology Department of The Johns Hopkins Hospital (2000-2011). Patients lacked history of invasive urothelial carcinoma. Two patterns of noninvasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma were identified: (1) as a variant of noninvasive high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma/micropapillary urothelial carcinoma) (n = 13 cases) and (2) as a variant of urothelial carcinoma in situ (carcinoma in situ/micropapillary urothelial carcinoma) (n = 5 cases with 2 of these patients also having high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma/micropapillary urothelial carcinoma). Of 18 patients, 16 (88%) were male with a mean age of 71.8 years (range, 54-87 years). Of the 12 patients initially treated with surveillance, Bacillus-Calmette Guérin, or intravesical chemotherapy, 4 did not recur and were without evidence of disease at 6, 21, 24, and 39 months. Four patients experienced recurrences with 3 of them without evidence of disease at 36, 52, and 72 months and with the fourth whose last follow-up was at 84 months when recurrence occurred. One patient is alive at 11 months with disease, and 1 died of other causes at 1 month. Two patients progressed to pT2 and pT3 disease at 5 and 21 months, respectively. It is critical to differentiate and clearly specify in pathology reports whether micropapillary urothelial carcinoma is invasive or noninvasive because invasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a high degree of understaging, whereas some cases of noninvasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma are not necessarily associated with an adverse outcome.
    Human pathology 08/2012; 43(12). DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2012.04.013 · 2.81 Impact Factor