Multi-Family Psycho-Education Group for Assertive Community Treatment Clients and Families of Culturally Diverse Background: A Pilot Study

Assertive Community Treatment Team and Mental Health Court Support Program, Community Mental Health Program, Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Hospital, Joseph and Wolf Lebovic Health Complex and the University of Toronto, 260 Spadina Avenue, Suite 204, Toronto, ON, M5T 2E4, Canada.
Community Mental Health Journal (Impact Factor: 1.03). 04/2010; 46(4):364-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-010-9305-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study evaluates the incorporation of Multi-Family Psycho-education Group (MFPG) to an Assertive Community Treatment Team developed to serve culturally diverse clients who suffers from severe mental illness. Participants included Chinese and Tamil clients and their family members. Family members' well-being, perceived burden, and acceptance of clients were assessed before and after the intervention. Focus group interviews with clinicians were conducted to qualitatively examine MFPG. Family members' acceptance increased after MFPG. Regular attendance was associated with reduction in perceived family burden. Culturally competent delivery of MFPG enhanced family members' understanding of mental illness and reduced stress levels and negative feelings towards clients.

Download full-text


Available from: Joel Sadavoy, Sep 27, 2015
32 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The assertive community treatment (ACT) teams of Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto and the KUINA Center, Hitachinaka, Japan, were compared with regard to ACT fidelity, organizational structure, populations served, and treatment outcomes. Ethnocultural adaptations to the ACT model made by both teams included enhanced family support and intervention, culturally and linguistically matched staff and patients when possible, culturally informed therapy, routine cultural assessments, culturally matched housing and community support, and flexible funding models. Data were gathered by chart reviews (66 patients in Toronto and 40 patients in Japan), a satisfaction measure, a standard measure of ACT fidelity, and a pre-post measure of treatment outcomes (the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale), and hospitalization days. Both teams achieved good fidelity to ACT and reductions in hospitalization and symptom severity. Family satisfaction scores were high. With culturally informed adaptations, ACT can be effective in a Canadian mixed ethnocultural population and a homogeneous Japanese population.
    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) 08/2011; 62(8):971-4. DOI:10.1176/ · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major depressive disorder is reported to be the most common mental disorder, and one of the leading causes of disability-adjusted life years. It causes high levels of family burden and of expressed emotions. Research interest in family functioning in mental disorders has recently shifted from schizophrenia to unipolar and bipolar affective disorders. However, studies on family burden and on the effect of family psychoeducational interventions on major depression are still very few in number and lack a rigorous methodology, clear outcome measures and adequate follow-ups. Despite this, the few available studies on the efficacy of psychoeducational family intervention in unipolar major depression have had promising results. A comprehensive management of unipolar major depression should include psychoeducational family intervention.
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 01/2012; 12(1):83-91; quiz 92. DOI:10.1586/ern.11.131 · 2.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is known to have a positive impact on the number and length of inpatient stays. Yet, research is needed in order to help understand how ACT programs may ease off families’ burden, e.g. in terms of economic expenditures. Indeed, many families with siblings suffering from chronic mental illness, who disengaged from psychiatric services, report needs related to ACT. This paper aims to describe the impact of a new ACT program in Geneva on patients and their families’ burden. Methods Out of 91 patients consecutively treated by the ACT program for at least 3 months, 55 consented to participate in the research. Twenty-one allowed us to contact their families (out of 37 who had relatives in the area). Data were gathered on patients and families before and after a 6-month-follow-up. Results For the patients, after adjustment for the time spent during follow-up, most of the studied variables evolved favorably, particularly for their symptoms. At baseline, most of the family members felt overburdened by the financial cost (59.1%) related to their relatives with severe mental disorder and experienced inconvenience at having to give them assistance in daily life (68.2%) and to supervise them in daily activities (54.5%). Several variables evolved favorably during follow-up. Notably the best changes were observed for the inconvenience relating to assistance in daily life and relatives’ emotional distress. Families of patients with delusional disorder featured less or no improvement during the ACT follow-up. The best correlate of improvement in familial burdens was improvement in patient's positives symptoms. Among those patients, being a female and suffering from a schizo-affective disorder was known to have had a higher impact on the number of interventions provided by families. Discussion ACT should be recommended for patients who feature a poor outcome when treated in other settings. In addition, our results suggest that their families can also improve considerably, particularly those confronted with patients with persistent and enduring disturbing behaviors related to positive symptoms which do not, however, warrant hospitalization. Clinicians should pay particular attention to patients suffering from delusional disorder and their families, as this disorder does not appear to be associated with improvement in family burdens. These data do not allow definitely disentangling whether the improvement of families’ burden is directly related to ACT interventions with them, to the implementation of support by other structures (such as peer support groups) or to an indirect effect related to patients’ improvement. To our knowledge no similar study on the effect of ACT on family burden exists. Hence, such research needs to be replicated in other areas with different clinical and cultural backgrounds.
    L Encéphale 06/2012; 38(3):201–210. DOI:10.1016/j.encep.2011.11.006 · 0.70 Impact Factor
Show more