Article

Cancer-Related Symptom Assessment in France: Validation of the French M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory

Equipe Mobile de Soins de Support, Soins Palliatifs et Traitement de la Douleur, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Boulogne, France.
Journal of pain and symptom management (Impact Factor: 2.74). 04/2010; 39(4):721-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.08.014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This multicenter study was intended to validate the French version of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-Fr) in French cancer patients (n=162) with solid tumors or hematological malignancies. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used as a part of the validation. Factor analysis showed three underlying constructs for symptom items: general symptoms (pain, fatigue, disturbed sleep, shortness of breath, drowsiness, dry mouth, and numbness or tingling items); emotional and cognitive components (distress, sadness, and remembering items); and a gastrointestinal component (nausea, vomiting, and lack of appetite items), with Cronbach's alphas of 0.79, 0.73, and 0.71, respectively. Convergent validity was established by comparing MDASI-Fr items with the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Overall, the 19-item MDASI-Fr score correlated well with the QLQ-C30 global health status, and the pain item of the MDASI-Fr was highly correlated with the short form of the BPI. The most prevalent symptoms were fatigue, distress, dry mouth, and pain. Twenty-five percent of patients reported moderate or severe pain (numeric rating scale >4 on 0-10 severity ratings). Physician ratings of global change on a second visit were significantly associated with changes in patient ratings on the MDASI-Fr, supporting the sensitivity of the measure. Symptoms interfered most with work and general activity. The MDASI-Fr is a valid and reliable tool for measuring symptom severity and interference in French cancer patients.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Frédéric Guirimand, Apr 21, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
110 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the significance of symptoms and their severity for predicting survival of hospitalized patients with far advanced cancer. Two hundred fifty-six patients with far advanced cancer at the Cancer Center of Tongji Hospital, China were assessed by the Chinese version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-C). A Cox regression model was used to determine symptoms that could predict survival time. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival of patients accompanied by significant symptoms at different intensities. Median survival was 49 days. Fatigue was the most common and severe symptom, followed by lack of appetite, disturbed sleep, and pain. Multivariate analysis showed that fatigue, shortness of breath, lack of appetite, and feeling sad were independent prognostic factors for survival time (p  < 0.05), with a hazard ratio of dying of 1.39, 1.13, 1.33, and 1.16, respectively. The survival time for patients with different intensities of the four symptoms showed significant differences (p  <  0.01). Fatigue, lack of appetite, feeling sad, and shortness of breath could be predictive factors for survival time of hospitalized patients with far advanced cancer. The more severe these symptoms are, the shorter will be survival time.
    Palliative Medicine 04/2011; 25(7):682-90. DOI:10.1177/0269216311398301 · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:: The efficacy of local anesthetic wound infiltration for the treatment of acute and chronic postoperative pain is controversial and there are no detailed studies. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of ropivacaine wound infiltration on chronic pain after breast surgery. METHODS:: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 236 patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive ropivacaine or placebo infiltration of the wound, the second and third intercostal spaces and the humeral insertion of major pectoralis. Acute pain, analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting were assessed every 30 min for 2 h in the postanesthesia care unit and every 6 h for 48 h. Chronic pain was evaluated 3 months, 6 months, and 1 yr after surgery by the brief pain inventory, hospital anxiety and depression, and neuropathic pain questionnaires. RESULTS:: Ropivacaine wound infiltration significantly decreased immediate postoperative pain for the first 90 min, but did not decrease chronic pain at 3 months (primary endpoint), or at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. At 3 months, the incidence of chronic pain was 33% and 27% (P = 0.37) in the ropivacaine and placebo groups, respectively. During follow-up, brief pain inventory, neuropathic pain, and anxiety increased over time in both groups (P < 0.001) while depression remained stable. No complications occurred. CONCLUSION:: This multicenter, prospective study shows that ropivacaine wound infiltration after breast cancer surgery decreased immediate postoperative pain but did not decrease chronic pain at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
    Anesthesiology 02/2013; 118(2):318-326. DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827d88d8 · 6.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La douleur est fréquemment rencontrée en cancérologie, du fait de la maladie, du traitement de la maladie, ou d’une raison intercurrente. Ses mécanismes sont variés, elle peut être inflammatoire, neuropathique, somatique, viscérale, aiguë, chronique. Elle a un impact négatif sur la qualité de vie et potentiellement sur la survie. Son traitement fait appel à diverses approches, symptomatiques ou plus spécifiques. La prise en charge est fréquemment considérée comme peu satisfaisante, comme cela a été retrouvé en France. Quelques explications et propositions sont avancées. Abstract Pain is frequently encountered in patients with cancer, due to cancer itself, to cancer treatment, or to an independent cause. It is linked with various mechanisms as inflammatory, neuropathic, somatic or visceral, acute or chronic. It has a negative impact on patients’ quality of life, and probably on patients’ survival. Cancer pain treatment is based on the efficacy of various approaches such symptomatic or specific interventions. Cancer pain management is often considered as poor, as found in the results of French surveys. Some explanations and proposals are offered.
    Douleur et Analgésie 09/2013; 26(3):126-132. DOI:10.1007/s11724-013-0345-9 · 0.09 Impact Factor
Show more