Article

Impingement pressure in the anatomical and nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.7). 08/2010; 38(8):1611-7. DOI: 10.1177/0363546510363461
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although the literature has extensively discussed impingement after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the definition of impingement is vague, and impingement pressure has not been well investigated as a function of tunnel position.
To determine the amount of impingement pressure between the ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and between the ACL and notch roof in the native ACL, the single-bundle ACL reconstruction with different tunnel placements, and the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Controlled laboratory study.
Fifteen fresh-frozen nonpaired human cadaver knees were used. In each knee, different femoral and tibial tunnels were created, which allowed different graft placements. A single graft was placed in 3 positions: tibial anteromedial (AM) to femoral AM (anatomical), tibial posterolateral (PL) to femoral high AM (nonanatomical/mismatch), and tibial AM to femoral high AM. Double grafts were placed in an anatomical fashion (AM to AM and PL to PL). In each case, pressure-measuring films were inserted between the ACL and roof, the ACL and PCL, and the AM and PL bundles (for double-bundle group only). Knees were then moved with 40 N of force and from full flexion to full extension, and the pressure pattern on the film was analyzed.
Compared with other groups, only the AM-high AM group showed significantly higher roof impingement pressure (P < .05). There was no significant difference in PCL impingement pressure between the intact ACL group and any of the reconstructed groups. No impingement pressure was observed between the grafts in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
This study evaluated the effect of different tunnel placements on the impingement pressure after ACL reconstruction. Anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction and nonanatomical tibial PL-femoral high AM ACL reconstruction do not cause roof, PCL, and interbundle impingement.
Surgeons can perform the anatomical double-bundle ACL, anatomical single-bundle, and nonanatomical tibial PL-femoral high AM reconstructions as impingement-free reconstructions.

0 Followers
 · 
112 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anatomic placement of the bone tunnel reportedly reduces impingement of the graft with the intercondylar roof, but as a trade-off, the risk of impingement with the lateral wall of the intercondylar notch would increase instead in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
    The American Journal of Sports Medicine 06/2014; 42(9). DOI:10.1177/0363546514536872 · 4.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the dimensions of the femoral intercondylar notch intraoperatively and to determine whether a small intercondylar notch increases the risk of graft failure after individualized anatomic single- or double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed. One hundred and thirty-seven primary single- or double-bundle ACL reconstructions with at least 2-year follow-up were included in this study. Of these, 116 subjects had intraoperative notch measurements recorded. All operations were performed anatomically using a three-portal technique by the senior author. Intraoperative notch measurements (width at the base, middle, and top and height) were taken using a standard, commercially available arthroscopic ruler. Graft failure was defined as patient report of instability, pathologic laxity on clinical exam, or an MRI or arthroscopic diagnosis of rupture or absence of the ACL graft. Results Graft failure at 2-year follow-up in the overall population was 13.9 % (19/137). Graft failure was reported to occur from contact or non-contact trauma, failure of the graft to incorporate, or hardware failure. The dimensions of the intercondylar notch and the graft type used did not influence the risk of graft failure. Conclusions Smaller intercondylar notch dimensions do not appear to be a risk factor for higher rates of graft failure after anatomic and individualized ACL reconstruction. Based on these data, the use of notchplasty is not supported in conjunction with individualized anatomic single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Level of evidence Case series, Level IV.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 11/2014; 23(3). DOI:10.1007/s00167-014-3414-6 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee is potentially devastating for the patient and can result in both acute and long-term clinical problems. Consequently, the ACL has always been and continues to be of great interest to orthopaedic scientists and clinicians worldwide. Major advancements in ACL surgery have been made in the past few years. ACL reconstruction has shifted from an open to arthroscopic procedure, in which a two- and later one-incision technique was applied. Studies have found that traditional, transtibial arthroscopic single-bundle reconstruction does not fully restore rotational stability of the knee joint, and as such, a more anatomic approach to ACL reconstruction has emerged. The goal of anatomic ACL reconstruction is to replicate the knee's normal anatomy and restore its normal kinematics, all while protecting long-term knee health. This manuscript describes the research that has changed the paradigm of ACL reconstruction from traditional techniques to present day anatomic and individualized concepts.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 08/2014; 23(3). DOI:10.1007/s00167-014-3209-9 · 2.84 Impact Factor