Article

Continuous and Cyclic Progesterone Differentially Interact with Estradiol in the Regulation of Alzheimer-Like Pathology in Female 3xTransgenic-Alzheimer's Disease Mice

University of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089-0191.
Endocrinology (Impact Factor: 4.72). 06/2010; 151(6):2713-22. DOI: 10.1210/en.2009-1487
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Depletion of estrogens and progesterone at menopause has been linked to an increased risk for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in women. A currently controversial literature indicates that although treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone therapy (HT) may reduce the risk of AD, several parameters of HT may limit its potential efficacy and perhaps, even exacerbate AD risk. One such parameter is continuous vs. cyclic delivery of the progestogen component of HT. Recent experimental evidence suggests that continuous progesterone can attenuate neural actions of estradiol (E(2)). In the present study, we compared the effects of continuous and cyclic progesterone treatment in the presence and absence of E(2) in ovariectomized 3xTg-AD mice, a transgenic mouse model of AD. We found that ovariectomy-induced hormone depletion increases AD-like pathology in female 3xTg-AD mice, including accumulation of beta-amyloid, tau hyperphosphorylation, and impaired hippocampal-dependent behavior. E(2) treatment alone prevents the increases in pathology. Continuous progesterone did not affect beta-amyloid levels when delivered alone but blocked the Abeta-lowering action of E(2). In contrast, cyclic progesterone significantly reduced beta-amyloid levels by itself and enhanced rather than inhibited the E(2) effects. These results provide new insight into the neural interactions between E(2) and progesterone that may prove valuable in optimizing HT regimens in postmenopausal women.

Full-text

Available from: Christian J Pike, Mar 31, 2015
0 Bookmarks
 · 
63 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Postmenopausal women may be more vulnerable to cognitive loss and Alzheimer's disease (AD) than premenopausal women because of their deficiency in estrogens, in addition to their usually older age. Aerobic physical exercise has been proposed as a therapeutic approach for maintaining health and well-being in postmenopausal women, and for improving brain health and plasticity in populations at high risk for AD. To study the neuroprotective mechanisms of physical exercise in a postmenopausal animal model, we submitted previously ovariectomized, six-month old non-transgenic and 3xTg-AD mice to three months of voluntary exercise in a running wheel. At nine months of age, we observed lower grip strength and some exacerbation of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)-like involving active exploratory activities. A similar major cognitive impairment was observed of ovariectomized 3xTg-AD mice in comparison with sham-operated 3xTg-AD mice. A reduction of bodily fitness and lack of retention of memory were observed in the ovariectomized non-transgenic mice. Physical exercise protected against all deleterious behaviors and normalized learning and memory. It also protected against body frailty, as expected. Analyses of hippocampal key markers of antioxidant and neuroplasticity signaling pathways, showed that ovariectomy impairs the activation of CREB through physical exercise. Furthermore, molecular and behavioral correlates suggested a central role of BDNF in the neuroprotection mediated by physical exercise therapy against apathy and memory loss induced by ovariectomy and the AD-genotype.
    Psychoneuroendocrinology 07/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.03.021 · 5.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Amyloid-beta peptide is the main component of amyloid plaques, which are found in Alzheimer's disease. The generation and deposition of amyloid-beta is one of the crucial factors for the onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease. Lipid rafts are glycolipid-rich liquid domains of the plasma membrane, where certain types of protein tend to aggregate and intercalate. Lipid rafts are involved in the generation of amyloid-beta oligomers and the formation of amyloid-beta peptides. In this paper, we review the mechanism by which lipid rafts disturb the aberrant degradative autophagic-lysosomal pathway of amyloid-beta, which plays an important role in the pathological process of Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, we describe this mechanism from the view of the Two-system Theory of fasciology and thus, suggest that lipid rafts may be a new target of Alzheimer's disease treatment.
    Neural Regeneration Research 01/2014; 9(1):92-100. DOI:10.4103/1673-5374.125335 · 0.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Meta-analysis of data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has confirmed the high risk of APOE and identified twenty other risk genes/loci with moderate effect size. However, many more risk genes/loci remain to be discovered to account for the missing heritability. The contributions from individual singe-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been thoroughly examined in traditional GWAS data analysis, while SNP-SNP interactions can be explored by a variety of alternative approaches. Here we applied generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction to the re-analysis of four publicly available GWAS datasets for AD. When considering 4-order intragenic SNP interactions, we observed high consistency of discovered potential risk genes among the four independent GWAS datasets. Ten potential risk genes were observed across all four datasets, including PDE1A, RYR3, TEK, SLC25A21, LOC729852, KIRREL3, PTPN5, FSHR, PARK2, and NR3C2. These potential risk genes discovered by generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction are highly relevant to AD pathogenesis based on multiple layers of evidence. The genetic contributions of these genes warrant further confirmation in other independent GWAS datasets for AD.
    Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD 04/2014; 41(4). DOI:10.3233/JAD-140054 · 3.61 Impact Factor