Article

Patient-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening A Mixed-Methods Analysis

Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
American journal of preventive medicine (Impact Factor: 4.28). 05/2010; 38(5):508-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.021
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Barriers experienced by patients influence the uptake of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Prior research has quantified how often patients encounter these challenges but has generally not revealed their complex perspective and experience with barriers.
This mixed-methods study was conducted to understand current perspectives on CRC screening.
A two-part, mixed-methods study was conducted of primary care patients recruited from Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network practices. First, in June-July 2005 a survey was mailed to 660 patients aged 50-75 years posing an open-ended question about "the most important barrier" to CRC screening. Second, beginning in October 2005, seven gender- and largely race-specific focus groups involving 40 patients aged 45-75 years were conducted. Beginning in October 2005, survey verbatim responses were coded and quantitatively analyzed and focus group transcripts were qualitatively analyzed.
Responses to the open-ended survey question, answered by 74% of respondents, identified fear and the bowel preparation as the most important barriers to screening. Only 1.6% of responses cited the absence of physician advice. Focus group participants cited similar issues and other previously reported barriers, but their remarks exposed the intricacies of complex barriers, such as fear, lack of information, time, the role of physicians, and access to care. Participants also cited barriers that have little documentation in the literature, such as low self-worth, "para-sexual" sensitivities, fatalism, negative past experiences with testing, and skepticism about the financial motivation behind screening recommendations.
Mixed-methods analysis helps to disaggregate the complex nuances that influence patient behavior. In the present study, patients explained the web of influences on knowledge, motivation, and ability to undergo CRC screening, which clinicians and policymakers should consider in designing interventions to increase the level of screening.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Resa M Jones, Oct 07, 2014
2 Followers
 · 
189 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the second highest cancer prevalence and mortality rates in Australia. The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) aims to increase early detection of CRC by offering free faecal occult blood testing. The NBCSP aims to offer choice to consumers about whether or not to participate in screening. This article presents data on trust, choice and perceived obligation to participate in the NBCSP by population groups with low uptake. A qualitative study was undertaken in South Australia. We interviewed 94 people from four culturally distinct groups: Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous peoples. This article demonstrates the complexity of factors shaping the choice, or lack thereof, to participate in the NBCSP. Informed choice is based on adequate knowledge, although this varied among our participants, highlighting the need for more health education in appropriate languages. An obligation to participate was found in the Iranian and Anglo-Australian groups and resulted from an established personal relationship with the doctor, a sense of duty, the acknowledgement of government investment and appreciation. Overall, this article makes a link between trust, choice and obligation, adding to literature on the sociology of trust and medical screening and highlighting important issues in the need of a policy and practice to improve CRC screening rates. © 2015 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness.
    Sociology of Health & Illness 04/2015; DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.12280 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chez les Français de plus de 50 ans, le cancer colorectal est une cause majeure de morbidité et de mortalité, et l’efficacité thérapeutique est d’autant améliorée que la maladie est traitée précocement. Pour une population asymptomatique présentant un risque moyen de développer un cancer intestinal, le test de dépistage a été systématisé. Le test habituellement utilisé est le test Hémoccult® II. Il permet de repérer d’infimes traces de sang dans les selles. Le recours à ce test reste encore de nos jours en deçà des normes recommandées (35/50 %), en dépit des campagnes de sensibilisation qui encouragent son usage. Ce dernier dépend de plusieurs facteurs: l’âge, le genre, le statut marital et le niveau d’étude, tout comme certains freins socioéconomiques et culturels et des raisons pratiques propres à la méthode employée. Quoi qu’il en soit, le dialogue et les recommandations du médecin envers le dépistage du cancer colorectal paraissent décisifs. Or, la peur, l’embarras, la gêne peuvent décourager certains patients à parler ouvertement avec leur médecin du cancer colorectal et de la technique bien particulière de son dépistage. Le rôle probable de ces émotions perturbatrices vis-à-vis de l’adoption d’un test de dépistage du cancer fait l’objet d’un nombre croissant d’études. Il est notamment encore difficile de savoir si l’anxiété décourage ou motive le dépistage du cancer colorectal. Nous pensons qu’il est important de mieux décrire les attitudes psychologiques affichées à son égard, en vue d’optimiser l’impact des campagnes qui recommandent son usage et de faciliter le dialogue singulier avec le médecin. In French people aged over 50 years, colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. For an asymptomatic population at average risk of developing this somatic disease, the test usually used is the Hemoccult II® Test, which can detect the presence of occult blood in the stool. It is clear that using this test remains today below the recommended standards despite health campaigns that encourage efficient use. Several practical reasons and socio-economic obstacles can be invoked to explain these findings. Anyway, the doctor’s recommendations against screening for colorectal cancer seem to be decisive. But fear and embarrassment may deter some patients from talking openly with their doctors about colorectal cancer and its screening. The possible role of these disturbing emotions in the adoption of cancer screening has been the subject of a growing number of researches over the past thirty years. But, it still remains very unclear whether anxiety inhibits or motivates colorectal cancer screening. To promote equal access to it, we think it is important to better describe the psychological attitudes displayed toward it, to maximize the impact of campaigns that recommend the use of the Hemoccult II® test. Mots clésDépistage du cancer colorectal–Adhésion–Facteurs psychologiques–Anxiété envers la santé–Embarras KeywordsColorectal cancer screening–Adherence–Psychological factors–Health anxiety–Embarrassment
    Psycho-Oncologie 03/2011; 5(1):25-33. DOI:10.1007/s11839-011-0304-8 · 0.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of death among women in the USA. Rural populations have lower rates of CRC screening than their urban counterparts, and rural women have lower screening rates compared with rural men. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify (1) beliefs of primary care physicians (PCPs) about CRC screening in rural communities, (2) factors that may cause gender disparities in CRC screening in rural areas, and (3) solutions to overcome those barriers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 PCPs practicing in rural central Pennsylvania. PCPs were asked about their CRC screening practices for women, availability of CRC screening services, reminder systems for CRC screening, and barriers to screening specific to their rural communities and to gender. Thematic analysis was used to identify major themes. All 17 PCPs endorsed the importance of CRC screening, but believed that there are barriers to CRC screening specific to women and to rural location. All PCPs identified colonoscopy as their screening method of choice, and generally reported that access to colonoscopy services in their rural areas was not a significant barrier. Barriers to CRC screening for women in rural communities were related to (1) PCPs' CRC screening practices, (2) gender-specific barriers to CRC screening, (3) patient-related barriers, (4) community-related barriers, and (5) physician practice-related barriers. Physicians overwhelmingly identified patient education as necessary for improving CRC screening in their rural communities, but believed that education would have to come from a source outside the rural primary care office due to lack of resources, personnel, and time. Overall, the PCPs in this study were motivated to identify ways to improve their ability to engage more eligible patients in CRC screening. These findings suggest several interventions to potentially improve CRC screening for women in rural areas, including encouraging use of other effective CRC screening modalities (eg fecal occult blood testing) when colonoscopy is not possible, systems-based reminders that leverage electronic resources and are not visit-dependent, and public health education campaigns aimed specifically at women in rural communities.
    Rural and remote health 13(4):2504. · 0.87 Impact Factor