Rosuvastatin for Primary Prevention in Older Persons With Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Low to Average Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels: Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Trial

Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 04/2010; 152(8):488-96, W174. DOI: 10.1059/0003-4819-152-8-201004200-00005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Randomized data on statins for primary prevention in older persons are limited, and the relative hazard of cardiovascular disease associated with an elevated cholesterol level weakens with advancing age.
To assess the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in persons 70 years or older.
Secondary analysis of JUPITER (Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
1315 sites in 26 countries randomly assigned participants in JUPITER.
Among the 17 802 participants randomly assigned with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels less than 3.37 mmol/L (<130 mg/dL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg/L or more without cardiovascular disease, 5695 were 70 years or older.
Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 20 mg of rosuvastatin daily or placebo.
The primary end point was the occurrence of a first cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes).
The 32% of trial participants 70 years or older accrued 49% (n = 194) of the 393 confirmed primary end points. The rates of the primary end point in this age group were 1.22 and 1.99 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.82]; P < 0.001). Corresponding rates of all-cause mortality in this age group were 1.63 and 2.04 (hazard ratio, 0.80 [CI, 0.62 to 1.04]; P = 0.090). Although no significant heterogeneity was found in treatment effects by age, absolute reductions in event rates associated with rosuvastatin were greater in older persons. The relative rate of any serious adverse event among older persons in the rosuvastatin versus placebo group was 1.05 (CI, 0.93 to 1.17).
Effect estimates from this exploratory analysis with age cut-point chosen after trial completion should be viewed in the context of the overall trial results.
In apparently healthy older persons without hyperlipidemia but with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, rosuvastatin reduces the incidence of major cardiovascular events.

Download full-text


Available from: James Shepherd, Jan 09, 2014
  • Source
    • "Chiral drugs contain at least one chiral center, resulting in 2n−1 pairs of enantiomers. Widely used chiral drugs, such as rosuvastatin, duloxetine and salbutamol, play an important role in treating human diseases1,2,3. In the environment of living systems, specific binding between molecules (eg, enzymes, receptors, transporters, and DNA) is required for their medicinal effect. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chiral drugs show distinct biochemical and pharmacological behaviors in the human body. The binding of chiral drugs to plasma proteins usually exhibits stereoselectivity, which has a far-reaching influence on their pharmacological activities and pharmacokinetic profiles. In this review, the stereoselective binding of chiral drugs to human serum albumin (HSA), α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) and lipoprotein, three most important proteins in human plasma, are detailed. Furthermore, the application of AGP variants and recombinant fragments of HSA for studying enantiomer binding properties is also discussed. Apart from the stereoselectivity of enantiomer-protein binding, enantiomer-enantiomer interactions that may induce allosteric effects are also described. Additionally, the techniques and methods used to determine drug-protein binding parameters are briefly reviewed.
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 07/2013; 34(8). DOI:10.1038/aps.2013.78 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 11/2010; 4(6):399-401. DOI:10.1007/s12170-010-0126-4
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rosuvastatin (Crestor®) is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) that has both lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects. The drug has various indications in the US, including the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with no clinical evidence of coronary heart disease who are at increased risk of CVD based on their age, a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level of ≥2mg/L, and at least one other CVD risk factor. The efficacy of rosuvastatin in apparently healthy women (aged ≥60 years) or men (aged ≥50 years) with normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and elevated hsCRP levels was demonstrated in the large, randomized, double-blind, multinational, JUPITER trial. Relative to placebo, rosuvastatin 20mg once daily for a median follow-up of 1.9 years significantly reduced the occurrence of first major cardiovascular events in this trial (primary endpoint). A between-group difference in favor of rosuvastatin was also demonstrated for various other endpoints, including overall deaths and the nonatherothrombotic endpoint of venous thromboembolism. Rosuvastatin remained more effective than placebo when primary endpoint results were stratified according to various baseline factors, including in patient subgroups thought to be at low risk of CVD. In addition, rosuvastatin was associated with reductions in LDL-C and hsCRP levels, and these reductions appeared to occur independently of each other. The greatest clinical benefit was observed in rosuvastatin recipients achieving an LDL-C level of <1.8mmol/L (<70mg/dL) and an hsCRP level of <2mg/L or, even more so, <1mg/L. Rosuvastatin was well tolerated in the JUPITER trial, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. Myalgia, arthralgia, constipation, and nausea were the most commonly occurring treatment-related adverse events, and the incidence of monitored adverse events and laboratory measurements was generally similar in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups. It is not yet known whether the mechanism of benefit of rosuvastatin is via lipid effects, anti-inflammatory effects, or a mixture of both, and the use of rosuvastatin solely on the basis of elevated hsCRP levels is controversial. Nonetheless, the drug remains an important pharmacologic option in the prevention of CVD, and has demonstrated efficacy in preventing major cardiovascular events in apparently healthy women (aged ≥60 years) or men (aged ≥50 years) with normal LDL-C levels and elevated hsCRP levels.
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 01/2010; 10(6). DOI:10.2165/11204600-000000000-00000 · 2.20 Impact Factor
Show more