Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is considered to be one of the functional somatic syndromes (FSS). Cognitions and behavior are thought to perpetuate the symptoms of CFS. Behavioral interventions based on the existing models of perpetuating factors are quite successful in reducing fatigue and disabilities. The evidence is reviewed that cognitive processes, particularly those that determine the perception of fatigue and its effect on behavior, play a central role in the maintenance of symptoms.
Findings from treatment studies suggest that cognitive factors mediate the positive effect of behavioral interventions on fatigue. Increased fitness or increased physical activity does not seem to mediate the treatment response. Additional evidence for the role of cognitive processes is found in studies comparing the subjective beliefs patients have of their functioning with their actual performance and in neurobiological research.
Three different cognitive processes may play a role in the perpetuation of CFS symptoms. The first is a general cognitive representation in which fatigue is perceived as something negative and aversive and CFS is seen as an illness that is difficult to influence. The second process involved is the focusing on fatigue. The third element is formed by specific dysfunctional beliefs about activity and fatigue.
"Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the best documented treatment for a wide range of FSS    . However, it is less investigated how, why and when CBT works, and several studies have called for more mediation research within this area    . Currently, a limited number of studies have examined mediators of change in FSS treatments , all of which emphasize the role of illness-related cognitions          . "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.12.005
Although there is substantial evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy alleviates symptoms in functional somatic syndromes, the mechanisms of change are less investigated. This study examined whether changes in illness perceptions mediated the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy.
We analysed additional data from a randomised controlled trial comparing completers of cognitive behavioural group therapy (46 patients) to an enhanced usual care group (66 patients). Proposed mediators (illness perceptions) and primary (physical health) and secondary (somatic symptoms and illness worry) outcomes were assessed by means of questionnaires at referral, baseline, end of treatment, and 10 and 16 months after randomisation. Multiple mediation analysis determined whether (1) changes in specific illness perceptions during treatment mediated the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy (primary analysis), and (2) whether changes in illness perceptions during the whole trial period were associated with improved outcome (secondary analysis).
Improvements in illness perceptions during treatment partially mediated the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy on physical health one year after treatment (sum of indirect effects 1.556, BCa 95% CI (0.006; 3.620)). Improving perceived control was particularly important. Changes in illness perceptions from baseline to 16 months after randomisation were associated with clinically meaningful improvements in physical health, somatic symptoms and illness worry during the same period.
Our results suggest that changing patients' illness perceptions is an important process in cognitive behavioural therapy for functional somatic syndromes. Challenging patients' own understanding of their illness may hence be a key element of successful treatment.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 12/2014; 78(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.12.005 · 2.74 Impact Factor
"Volgens een eerste theoretische opvatting, zouden burn-out patiënten hun vermoeidheid op een bepaalde manier beleven. Verschillende auteurs geven aan dat een bepaalde beleving van vermoeidheid bij mensen chronische vermoeidheidsklachten kan leiden tot mindere prestaties (Afari & Buchwald, 2003; Deluca, 2005; Knoop et al., 2010). Door de aandacht te richten op vermoeidheidssignalen en te denken dat inspanning tijdens vermoeidheid schadelijks is of te denken dat inspanning weinig zal opleveren, neemt de bereidheid om zich in te spannen af. "
"Der positive Effekt der kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie wird nicht durch eine komorbide psychiatrische Störung (Prins et al. 2005) oder durch psychische Beschwerden oder spezifische psychologische Verarbeitungsstile gemindert (Cella et al. 2011). Der Wirkmechanismus der kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie besteht allem Anschein nach nicht in einer erhöhten körperlichen Aktivität (Wiborg et al. 2010), sondern in Bewertungsprozessen in Form von erhöhtem Kontrollerleben und veränderter Problemwahrnehmung (Knoop et al. 2010; Wiborg et al. 2012). "
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.