Article

Cost Analysis of Internet vs. Print Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion.

University of Minnesota, School of Kinesiology, 209 Cooke Hall, 1900 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Psychology of Sport and Exercise (Impact Factor: 1.77). 05/2010; 11(3):246-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.10.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the costs associated with Internet and print-based physical activity interventions. METHOD: The costs associated with delivering tailored print and Internet-based interventions were estimated from a randomized controlled physical activity trial (n=167). The estimates were based on research assistant time sampling surveys, web development invoices, and other tracking procedures. RESULTS: Web-development costs for the Internet intervention were $109,564. Taken together with the website hosting fees and staff costs, the cost per participant per month was $122.52 The cost of the print intervention was $35.81 per participant per month. However, in a break-even analysis, the Internet intervention became more cost-efficient, relative to the print intervention, when the total number of participants exceeded 352. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to print-based interventions, Internet-based interventions may be a more cost efficient way to reach a large number of sedentary individuals.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
111 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Physical inactivity is a significant predictor of several chronic diseases, becoming more prevalent as people age. Since the aging population increases demands on healthcare budgets, effectively stimulating physical activity (PA) against acceptable costs is of major relevance. This study provides insight into long-term health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a tailored PA intervention among adults aged over fifty.
    BMC Public Health 10/2014; 14(1):1099. · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article provides a comprehensive review of Internet- and Website-based physical activity interventions targeting adult populations. Search procedures identified 72 unique Internet-based physical activity interventions published in peer-reviewed journals. Participants of the studies were predominately White, middle-aged (mean age = 43.3 years), and female (65.9%). Intervention durations ranged from 2 weeks to 13 months (median = 12 weeks). Forty-six of the studies were randomized controlled trials, 21 were randomized trials without a control condition, 2 were non-randomized controlled trials, and 3 used a single-group design. The majority of studies (n = 68) assessed outcomes immediately following the end of the intervention period, and 16 studies provided delayed postintervention assessments. Forty-four of the 72 studies (61.1%) reported significant increases in physical activity. Future directions for Internet-based physical activity interventions include increasing representation of minority and male populations in Internet-based efforts, conducting delayed postintervention follow-up assessments, and incorporating emerging technologies (ie, cellular and Smartphones) into Internet-based physical activity efforts.
    American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 01/2013; 8(1):42-68.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The adverse health effects of insufficient physical activity (PA) result in high costs to society. The economic burden of insufficient PA, which increases in our aging population, stresses the urgency for cost-effective interventions to promote PA among older adults. The current study provides insight in the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of different versions of a tailored PA intervention (Active Plus) among adults aged over fifty.Methods The intervention conditions (i.e. print-delivered basic (PB; N¿=¿439), print-delivered environmental (PE; N¿=¿435), Web-based basic (WB; N¿=¿423), Web-based environmental (WE; N¿=¿432) and a waiting-list control group were studied in a clustered randomized controlled trial. Intervention costs were registered during the trial. Health care costs, participant costs and productivity losses were identified and compared with the intervention effects on PA (in MET-hours per week) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) 12 months after the start of the intervention. Cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were calculated per intervention condition. Non-parametric bootstrapping techniques and sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty.ResultsAs a whole (i.e. the four intervention conditions together) the Active Plus intervention was found to be cost-effective. The PB-intervention (ICER¿=¿¿-55/MET-hour), PE-intervention (ICER¿=¿¿-94/MET-hour) and the WE-intervention (ICER¿=¿¿-139/MET-hour) all resulted in higher effects on PA and lower societal costs than the control group. With regard to QALYs, the PB-intervention (ICUR¿=¿¿38,120/QALY), the PE-intervention (ICUR¿=¿¿405,892/QALY) and the WE-intervention (ICUR¿=¿¿-47,293/QALY) were found to be cost-effective when considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¿20,000/QALY. In most cases PE had the highest probability to be cost-effective.Conclusions The Active Plus intervention was found to be a cost-effective manner to increase PA in a population aged over fifty when compared to no-intervention. The tailored Active Plus intervention delivered through printed material and with additional environmental information (PE) turned out to be the most cost-effective intervention condition as confirmed by the different sensitivity analyses. By increasing PA at relatively low costs, the Active Plus intervention can contribute to a better public health.Trial registrationDutch Trial Register: NTR2297.
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 09/2014; 11(1):122. · 3.68 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
48 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014