Contrast-Enhanced Whole-Heart Coronary MRA using Gadofosveset: 3.0 T versus 1.5 T

Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München Marchioninistr., Germany. <>
Academic radiology (Impact Factor: 1.75). 07/2010; 17(7):862-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.009
Source: PubMed


To compare contrast-enhanced coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3.0 T with the same technique performed at 1.5 T using the contrast agent gadofosveset.
In this prospective randomized study, 19 healthy male volunteers (mean age 28 years, mean weight 79.8 kg), after signing informed consents, underwent contrast-enhanced inversion recovery three-dimensional fast low angle shot (FLASH) MRA at 1.5 and at 3.0 T. Prospective electrocardiogram-triggering was combined with adaptive respiratory gating. For contrast-enhanced images, the intravascular contrast agent gadofosveset was used. Acquisition time, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of coronary blood, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between coronaries and adjacent myocardium or epicardial fat and image quality were analyzed for statistical differences by using a two-tailed paired-sample t-test. The ratio calculations were based on measurements performed on the raw data and the image quality was blinded and independently evaluated by two experienced radiologists using a five-point scale.
The mean values for the acquisition time were 14.58 +/- 0.1 minutes at 1.5 T and 16.40 +/- 0.2 minutes at 3.0 T. Overall SNR of all evaluated coronary segments proved higher at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T (74.0 +/- 42.1 at 3.0 T vs. 50.2 +/- 20.2 at 1.5 T, P = .04). Overall CNR between coronaries and myocardium was significantly increased at 3.0 T in comparison to 1.5 T (40.1 +/- 21.9 at 3.0 T vs. 24.4 +/- 17.2 at 1.5 T, P = .01). Between the two methods, no significant difference in overall CNR between coronaries and epicardial fat was observed (P = .08, NS). The 3.0 T MRA demonstrated superior overall image quality with respect to 1.5 T (2.28 +/- 0.71 at 3.0 T vs. 1.92 +/- 0.38 at 1.5T, P = .004).
The use of higher field strength, 3.0 T instead of 1.5 T, resulted in similar CNR between coronaries and epicardial fat, higher SNR values and CNR between blood and myocardium, as well as an improved overall image quality, when gadofosveset in combination with electrocardiogram and respiratory triggering for coronary MRA was used.

5 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRA suffers from cardiac motion artifacts and often requires a breath-hold. This work develops and evaluates a blood pool contrast-enhanced combined respiratory- and ECG-triggered MRA method. An SPGR sequence was modified to enable combined cardiac and respiratory triggering on a 1.5-T scanner. Twenty-three consecutive children referred for pediatric heart disease receiving gadofosveset were recruited in HIPAA-compliant fashion with IRB approval and informed consent. Children underwent standard non-triggered contrast-enhanced MRA with or without suspended respiration. Additionally, a free-breathing-triggered MRA was acquired. Triggered and non-triggered studies were presented in blinded random order independently to two radiologists twice. Anatomical structure delineation was graded for each triggered and non-triggered acquisition and the visual quality on triggered MRA was compared directly to that on non-triggered MRA. Triggered images received higher scores from each radiologist for all anatomical structures on each of the two reading sessions (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < 0.05). In direct comparison, triggered images were preferred over non-triggered images for delineating cardiac structures, with most comparisons reaching statistical significance (binomial test, P < 0.05). Combined cardiac and respiratory triggering, enabled by a blood pool contrast agent, improves delineation of most anatomical structures in pediatric cardiovascular MRA.
    Pediatric Radiology 07/2011; 41(12):1536-44. DOI:10.1007/s00247-011-2196-y · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gadolinium enhanced coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T appears to be superior to non-contrast methods. Gadofosveset is an intravascular contrast agent that may be well suited to this application. The purpose of this study was to perform an intra-individual comparison of gadofosveset and gadobenate for coronary MRA at 3 T. In this prospective randomized study, 22 study subjects [8 (36 %) male; 27.9 ± 6 years; BMI = 22.8 ± 2 kg/m(2)] underwent two studies using a contrast-enhanced inversion recovery three-dimensional fast low angle shot MRA at 3 T. The order of contrast agent administration was varied randomly, separated by an average of 30 ± 5 days, using either gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA; Bracco, 0.1 mmol/Kg) or gadofosveset trisodium (MS-325; Lantheus Med, 0.03 mmol/Kg). Acquisition time, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of coronary vessels and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated. Of 308 coronary arteries and veins segment analyzed, overall SNR of coronary arteries and veins segments were not different for the two contrast agents (132 ± 79 for gadofosveset vs. 135 ± 78 for gadobenate, p = 0.69). Coronary artery CNR was greater for gadofosveset in comparison to gadobenate (73.5 ± 46.9 vs. 59.3 ± 75.7 respectively, p = 0.03). Gadofosveset-enhanced MRA images displayed better image quality than gadobenate-enhanced MRA images (2.77 ± 0.61 for gadofosveset vs. 2.11 ± 0.51, p < .001). Inter- and intra-reader variability was excellent (ICC > 0.90) for both contrast agents. Gadofosveset trisodium appears to show slightly better performance for coronary MRA at 3 T compared to gadobenate.
    The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 03/2013; 29(5). DOI:10.1007/s10554-013-0192-z · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To evaluate appropriate injection protocols for gadofosveset at 1.5 and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for semiquantitative myocardial perfusion analysis. Materials and methods: Eighteen young healthy volunteers were subjected to first-pass perfusion cardiac scans at 1.5 and 3 T MRI using three different injection protocols for gadofosveset (0.00375, 0.0075, and 0.0150 mmol/kg bodyweight) and two perfusions. At both field strengths a T1-weighted saturation recovery turboFLASH sequence with parallel imaging was employed. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), maximum contrast enhancement ratio (CER), peak-baseline difference, and upslope values were assessed. Moreover, sectors with dark banding artifacts were evaluated. Results: Significant differences of the upslope values for first compared to second perfusion could be observed for the medium- and high-dose groups at 1.5 T (P < 0.01), but not at 3 T. Sectors with dark banding artifacts during first perfusion occurred significantly more often at the highest dose of gadofosveset compared to the lowest dose at 1.5 T (P = 0.04) and 3 T (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The best injection protocol for semiquantitative perfusion analysis at 1.5 T is 0.00375 mmol/kg, as higher doses lead to lower upslope values during the second perfusion. At 3 T 0.0075 mmol/kg should be used to avoid dark banding artifacts.
    The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 06/2013; 29(7). DOI:10.1007/s10554-013-0250-6 · 1.81 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications