Collagen cross-linking: A new treatment paradigm in corneal disease-A review

Centre for Eye Research Australia, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 1.95). 03/2010; 38(2):141-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02228.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The last 2 years has seen a marked increase in the prominence of corneal collagen cross-linking as a treatment strategy for progressive keratoconus. This interest has arisen from a body of laboratory evidence documenting the biomechanical and cellular changes induced by cross-linking. The findings of this research provide a plausible rationale for its use in keratoconus to retard the progression of this common disease. The rapidly growing number of clinical reports suggests, not only a consistent stabilizing effect of cross-linking, but that a variable improvement in corneal shape and visual function may also occur in some patients. However, the marked variation in the clinical course of keratoconus, together with the challenges of accurately evaluating refractive error, visual acuity and even corneal shape in this condition, demands further evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials. The aim of this review is to summarize the theoretical basis and risks of corneal collagen cross-linking, along with the available evidence for its use in keratoconus and other corneal disease states.

Download full-text


Available from: Grant R Snibson, Aug 15, 2015
  • Source
    • "The basic principle of photo-oxidative cross-linking is the same as that of photopolymerization, that is, UVA radiation causes the release of reactive oxygen species that can induce the formation of covalent cross-links through oxidation (Sionkowska, 2006). In cross-linking therapy with riboflavin/UVA, yellow riboflavin works as a photosensitizer that stimulates the formation of reactive oxygen species, and, at the same time, it also acts as a shield from the penetration of UVA (Snibson, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies have reported collagen cross-linking after exposure to riboflavin followed by ultraviolet-A (UVA) exposure. This study is the first to investigate the effect of a riboflavin-containing primer on adhesive interface stability and dentinal matrix metalloproteinase activity. Human dentin was etched with 35% phosphoric acid, treated with 0.1% riboflavin, exposed to UVA for 2 min, and bonded with a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Adhesive was applied to control specimens without riboflavin/UVA. Specimens were subjected to microtensile bond strength tests and pulled to failure after storage for 24 hrs, 6 mos, or 1 yr. Interfacial nanoleakage was evaluated by light and transmission electron microscopy. To investigate dentinal matrix metalloproteinase activity, we performed correlative zymographic assays on protein extracts obtained from phosphoric-acid-etched dentin powder with or without riboflavin/UVA treatment and XP Bond. Ultraviolet-activated riboflavin treatment increased the immediate bond strength to dentin at all aging intervals (p < 0.05 vs. control) and decreased interfacial nanoleakage in aged specimens (1 yr; p < 0.05). Zymograms revealed that riboflavin/UVA pre-treatment inhibited dentinal matrix metalloproteinase activity (especially MMP-9). In conclusion, dentinal collagen cross-linking induced by riboflavin/UVA increased immediate bond strength, stabilized the adhesive interface, and inhibited dentin matrix metalloproteinases, thereby increasing the durability of resin-dentin bonds.
    Journal of dental research 09/2011; 90(12):1439-45. DOI:10.1177/0022034511423397 · 4.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The main objectives for this evidence-based analysis were to determine the safety and effectiveness of photochemical corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin (vitamin B(2)) and ultraviolet-A radiation, referred to as CXL, for the management of corneal thinning disease conditions. The comparative safety and effectiveness of corneal cross-linking with other minimally invasive treatments such as intrastromal corneal rings was also reviewed. The Medical Advisory Secretariat (MAS) evidence-based analysis was performed to support public financing decisions. SUBJECT OF THE EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS: The primary treatment objective for corneal cross-linking is to increase the strength of the corneal stroma, thereby stabilizing the underlying disease process. At the present time, it is the only procedure that treats the underlying disease condition. The proposed advantages for corneal cross-linking are that the procedure is minimally invasive, safe and effective, and it can potentially delay or defer the need for a corneal transplant. In addition, corneal cross-linking does not adversely affect subsequent surgical approaches, if they are necessary, or interfere with corneal transplants. The evidence for these claims for corneal cross-linking in the management of corneal thinning disorders such as keratoconus will be the focus of this review. The specific research questions for the evidence review were as follows: TECHNICAL: How technically demanding is corneal cross-linking and what are the operative risks?SAFETY: What is known about the broader safety profile of corneal cross-linking?Effectiveness - Corneal Surface Topographic Affects:What are the corneal surface remodeling effects of corneal cross-linking?Do these changes interfere with subsequent interventions, particularly corneal transplant known as penetrating keratoplasty (PKP)?Effectiveness -Visual Acuity:What impacts does the remodeling have on visual acuity?Are these impacts predictable, stable, adjustable and durable?Effectiveness - Refractive Outcomes: What impact does remodeling have on refractive outcomes?Effectiveness - Visual Quality (Symptoms): What impact does corneal cross-linking have on vision quality such as contrast vision, and decreased visual symptoms (halos, fluctuating vision)?Effectiveness - Contact lens tolerance: To what extent does contact lens intolerance improve after corneal cross-linking?Vision-Related QOL: What is the impact of corneal cross-linking on functional visual rehabilitation and quality of life?PATIENT SATISFACTION: Are patients satisfied with their vision following the procedure?Disease Process:What impact does corneal cross-linking have on the underling corneal thinning disease process?Does corneal cross-linking delay or defer the need for a corneal transplant?What is the comparative safety and effectiveness of corneal cross-linking compared with other minimally invasive treatments for corneal ectasia such as intrastromal corneal rings? CLINICAL NEED: TARGET POPULATION AND CONDITION Corneal ectasia (thinning) disorders represent a range of disorders involving either primary disease conditions, such as keratoconus (KC) and pellucid marginal corneal degeneration, or secondary iatrogenic conditions, such as corneal thinning occurring after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) refractive surgery. Corneal thinning is a disease that occurs when the normally round dome-shaped cornea progressively thins causing a cone-like bulge or forward protrusion in response to the normal pressure of the eye. The thinning occurs primarily in the stroma layers and is believed to be a breakdown in the collagen process. This bulging can lead to irregular astigmatism or shape of the cornea. Because the anterior part of the cornea is responsible for most of the focusing of the light on the retina, this can then result in loss of visual acuity. The reduced visual acuity can make even simple daily tasks, such as driving, watching television or reading, difficult to perform. Keratoconus is the most common form of corneal thinning disorder and involves a noninflammatory chronic disease process of progressive corneal thinning. Although the specific cause for the biomechanical alterations in the corneal stroma is unknown, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that genetic factors may play an important role. Keratoconus is a rare disease (< 0.05% of the population) and is unique among chronic eye diseases because it has an early onset, with a median age of 25 years. Disease management for this condition follows a step-wise approach depending on disease severity. Contact lenses are the primary treatment of choice when there is irregular astigmatism associated with the disease. Patients are referred for corneal transplants as a last option when they can no longer tolerate contact lenses or when lenses no longer provide adequate vision. Keratoconus is one of the leading indications for corneal transplants and has been so for the last 3 decades. Despite the high success rate of corneal transplants (up to 20 years) there are reasons to defer it as long as possible. Patients with keratoconus are generally young and a longer-term graft survival of at least 30 or 40 years may be necessary. The surgery itself involves lengthy time off work and postsurgery, while potential complications include long-term steroid use, secondary cataracts, and glaucoma. After a corneal transplant, keratoconus may recur resulting in a need for subsequent interventions. Residual refractive errors and astigmatism can remain challenges after transplantation, and high refractive surgery and regraft rates in KC patients have been reported. Visual rehabilitation or recovery of visual acuity after transplant may be slow and/or unsatisfactory to patients. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGY/THERAPY: Corneal cross-linking involves the use of riboflavin (vitamin B(2)) and ultraviolet-A (UVA) radiation. A UVA irradiation device known as the CXL® device (license number 77989) by ACCUTECH Medical Technologies Inc. has been licensed by Health Canada as a Class II device since September 19, 2008. An illumination device that emits homogeneous UVA, in combination with any generic form of riboflavin, is licensed by Health Canada for the indication to slow or stop the progression of corneal thinning caused by progressive keratectasia, iatrogenic keratectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and pellucid marginal degeneration. The same device is named the UV-X® device by IROCMedical, with approvals in Argentina, the European Union and Australia. UVA devices all use light emitting diodes to generate UVA at a wavelength of 360-380 microns but vary in the number of diodes (5 to 25), focusing systems, working distance, beam diameter, beam uniformity and extent to which the operator can vary the parameters. In Ontario, CXL is currently offered at over 15 private eye clinics by refractive surgeons and ophthalmologists. The treatment is an outpatient procedure generally performed with topical anesthesia. The treatment consists of several well defined procedures. The epithelial cell layer is first removed, often using a blunt spatula in a 9.0 mm diameter under sterile conditions. This step is followed by the application of topical 0.1% riboflavin (vitamin B(2)) solution every 3 to 5 minutes for 25 minutes to ensure that the corneal stroma is fully penetrated. A solid-state UVA light source with a wavelength of 370 nm (maximum absorption of riboflavin) and an irradiance of 3 mW/cm(2) is used to irradiate the central cornea. Following treatment, a soft bandage lens is applied and prescriptions are given for oral pain medications, preservative-free tears, anti-inflammatory drops (preferably not nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs) and antibiotic eye drops. Patients are recalled 1 week following the procedure to evaluate re-epithelialization and they are followed-up subsequently. EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS METHODS: A literature search was conducted on photochemical corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin (vitamin B(2)) and ultraviolet-A for the management of corneal thinning disorders using a search strategy with appropriate keywords and subject headings for CXL for literature published up until April 17, 2011. The literature search for this Health Technology Assessment (HTA) review was performed using the Cochrane Library, the Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI) and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The websites of several other health technology agencies were also reviewed, including the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) and the United Kingdom's National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). The databases searched included OVID MEDLINE, MEDLINE IN-Process and other Non-Indexed Citations such as EMBASE. As the evidence review included an intervention for a rare condition, case series and case reports, particularly for complications and adverse events, were reviewed. A total of 316 citations were identified and all abstracts were reviewed by a single reviewer for eligibility. For those studies meeting the eligibility criteria, full-text articles were obtained. Reference lists were also examined for any additional relevant studies not identified through the search. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
    Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 01/2011; 11(5):1-89.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present the case of an 11-year-old boy who had bilateral implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for progressive keratoconus and poor vision. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were seen, and 1 year postoperatively, the patient maintained good spectacle-corrected vision. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
    Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 01/2011; 37(1):201-5. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.023 · 2.55 Impact Factor
Show more