Article

Lewis AJ, Galbally M, Opie G, Buist A. Neonatal growth outcomes at birth and one month postpartum following in utero exposure to antidepressant medication. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 44: 482-487

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 3.77). 05/2010; 44(5):482-7. DOI: 10.3109/00048670903559593
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Method: A prospective case-control study recruited 27 pregnant women taking antidepressant medication and 27 matched controls who were not taking antidepressant medication in pregnancy at an obstetric hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Of the 27 women taking medication, 25 remained on medication in the third trimester. A purpose-designed self-report questionnaire and the Beck Depression Inventory-II were completed in pregnancy, after birth and at one month postpartum. In addition information was collected on exposed and non-exposed infants including Apgar scores, birthweight/length/head circumference and gestational age at birth. Weight/length/head circumference was again collected at 1 month of age. Results: Infants exposed to antidepressants in utero were eightfold more likely to be born at a premature gestational age, had significantly lower birthweight and were smaller in length and head circumference than non-exposed infants. There was no association between birth outcomes and maternal depression. At 1 month, the difference in weight in the exposed group became significantly greater than the control group. Conclusion: Antidepressant exposure in utero may affect gestational age at birth and neonatal outcomes independently of antenatal maternal depression. Further studies are needed to examine whether these findings vary according to the type of antidepressant prescribed and follow up growth and development in exposed infants beyond 1 month.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Andrew James Lewis, Aug 27, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
107 Views
  • Source
    • "By contrast, a small case-control study of 27 pregnant women who took antidepressant medications for diagnosed major depression and 27 matched controls with depression severity assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (second edition)197 showed an increased risk of low birth weight (OR 8.33, 95% CI 1.11–62.67) and significantly lower postpartum body weight, length, and head circumference measured at 1 month postdelivery with antenatal antidepressant exposure.165 There was no significant association between depressive symptoms, smoking, or alcohol use and risk of low birth weight or subsequent infant-growth measures, suggesting an independent effect of medication exposure. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In pregnant women with major depression, the overarching goal of treatment is to achieve or maintain maternal euthymia, thus limiting both maternal and fetal exposure to the harmful effects of untreated or incompletely treated depression. However, the absence of uniformly effective therapies with guaranteed obstetric and fetal safety makes the treatment of major depression during pregnancy among the most formidable of clinical challenges. Clinicians and patients are still faced with conflicting data and expert opinion regarding the reproductive safety of antidepressants in pregnancy, as well as large gaps in our understanding of the effectiveness of most antidepressants and nonpharmacological alternatives for treating antenatal depression. In this paper, we provide a clinically focused review of the available information on potential maternal and fetal risks of untreated maternal depression during pregnancy, the effectiveness of interventions for maternal depression during pregnancy, and potential obstetric, fetal, and neonatal risks associated with antenatal antidepressant use.
    Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 09/2014; 6:109-29. DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S43308
  • Source
    • "It can be concluded from studies on psychotropic medication that, to minimize effects on longer term child development, single agents should be considered when treating maternal mental illness in pregnancy, keeping doses as low as is feasible for effective treatment. There is an urgent need for further studies to delineate risks for specific agents so that more informed choices can be made [124-126]. When considering the use, and hence exposure, to antidepressants in pregnancy, the issues relevant to child development and mental health outcomes are not just those that relate to exposure per se but also to the impact of untreated maternal mental illness. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper concerns future policy development and programs of research for the prevention of mental disorders based on research emerging from fetal and early life programming. The current review offers an overview of findings on pregnancy exposures such as maternal mental health, lifestyle factors, and potential teratogenic and neurotoxic exposures on child outcomes. Outcomes of interest are common child and adolescent mental disorders including hyperactive, behavioral and emotional disorders. This literature suggests that the preconception and perinatal periods offer important opportunities for the prevention of deleterious fetal exposures. As such, the perinatal period is a critical period where future mental health prevention efforts should be focused and prevention models developed. Interventions grounded in evidence-based recommendations for the perinatal period could take the form of public health, universal and more targeted interventions. If successful, such interventions are likely to have lifelong effects on (mental) health.
    BMC Medicine 02/2014; 12(1):33. DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-12-33 · 7.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "7 No Einarson [22] 2010 Various AD Nondepressed Retrospective 1856 1.7 (1.18–2.45) 6 No Lewis [23] 2010 SSRI or SNRI Mixed Prospective 54 8.33 (1.11–62.67) 4.52 (0.47–43.41) 9 Yes Reis [24] 2010 SSRI Mixed Retrospective 1068177 1.13 (0.97–1.31) 1.45 (1.31–1.63) "
    General hospital psychiatry 01/2014; 36(3). DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.01.005 · 2.90 Impact Factor
Show more