Article

Plasma interleukin-8 is not an effective risk stratification tool for adults with vasopressor-dependent septic shock

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Critical care medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 04/2010; 38(6):1436-41. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181de42ad
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Plasma interleukin-8 levels of <220 pg/mL have an excellent negative predictive value (94% to 95%) for death at 28 days in children with septic shock and thus may be useful for risk stratification in clinical trial enrollment in this population. Whether plasma interleukin-8 would have similar utility in adults with septic shock is unknown.
Analysis of plasma interleukin-8 levels and prospectively collected clinical data from patients enrolled in two large randomized controlled trials of ventilator strategy for acute lung injury.
Intensive care units of university hospitals participating in the National Institutes of Health Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network.
One hundred ninety-two adult patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock.
None.
Plasma interleukin-8 levels > or =220 pg/mL were significantly associated with death at 28 days in this cohort (odds ratio, 2.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.42 to 5.99; p = .001). However, in contrast to the findings in pediatric septic shock, a plasma interleukin-8 cutoff <220 pg/mL had a negative predictive value for death of only 74% (95% confidence interval, 66% to 81%) in adults with septic shock. Receiver operating characteristic analysis found an area under the curve of 0.59 for plasma interleukin-8, indicating that plasma interleukin-8 is a poor predictor of mortality in this group. In adults aged <40 yrs, a plasma interleukin-8 cutoff <220 pg/mL had a negative predictive value of 92%.
In contrast to similar pediatric patients, plasma interleukin-8 levels are not an effective risk stratification tool in older adults with septic shock. Future studies of biomarkers for risk stratification in critically ill subjects will need to be replicated in multiple different populations before being applied in screening for clinical trials.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Lorraine Ware, Jun 09, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
85 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sepsis is the most frequent cause of death in non-coronary intensive care units (ICUs). In the past 10years, progress has been made in the early identification of septic patients and in their treatment and these improvements in support and therapy mean that the mortality is gradually decreasing but it still remains unacceptably high. Leaving clinical diagnosis aside, the laboratory diagnostics represent a complex range of investigations that can place significant demands on the system given the speed of response required. There are hundreds of biomarkers which could be potentially used for diagnosis and prognosis in septic patients. The main attributes of successful markers would be high sensitivity, specificity, possibility of bed-side monitoring, and financial accessibility. Only a fraction is used in routine clinical practice because many lack sufficient sensitivity or specificity. The following review gives a short overview of the current epidemiology of sepsis, its pathogenesis and state-of-the-art knowledge on the use of specific biochemical, hematological and immunological parameters in its diagnostics. Prospective approaches towards discovery of new diagnostic biomarkers have been shortly mentioned. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Clinica Chimica Acta 11/2014; 440C:97-103. DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.012 · 2.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For nearly a decade, our research group has had the privilege of developing and mining a multi-center, microarray-based, genome-wide expression database of critically ill children (≤ 10 years of age) with septic shock. Using bioinformatic and systems biology approaches, the expression data generated through this discovery-oriented, exploratory approach have been leveraged for a variety of objectives, which will be reviewed. Fundamental observations include wide spread repression of gene programs corresponding to the adaptive immune system, and biologically significant differential patterns of gene expression across developmental age groups. The data have also identified gene expression-based subclasses of pediatric septic shock having clinically relevant phenotypic differences. The data have also been leveraged for the discovery of novel therapeutic targets, and for the discovery and development of novel stratification and diagnostic biomarkers. Almost a decade of genome-wide expression profiling in pediatric septic shock is now demonstrating tangible results. The studies have progressed from an initial discovery-oriented and exploratory phase, to a new phase where the data are being translated and applied to address several areas of clinical need.Pediatric Research (2013); doi:10.1038/pr.2013.11.
    Pediatric Research 01/2013; 73. DOI:10.1038/pr.2013.11 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the past decade several investigators have applied microarray technology and related bioinformatic approaches to clinical sepsis and septic shock, thus allowing for an assessment of how, or if, this branch of genomic medicine has meaningfully impacted the field of sepsis research. The ability to simultaneously and efficiently measure the steady-state mRNA abundance of thousands of transcripts from a given tissue source (that is, 'transcriptomics') has provided an unprecedented opportunity to gain a broader, genome-level 'picture' of complex and heterogeneous clinical syndromes such as sepsis. A trancriptomic approach to sepsis and septic shock is technically challenging on multiple levels, but nonetheless modest, tangible advances are being realized. These include a genome-level understanding of the complexity of sepsis and septic shock, identification of novel candidate pathways and targets for potential intervention, discovery of novel, candidate diagnostic and stratification biomarkers, and the ability to stratify patients into clinically relevant, expression-based subclasses. The challenges moving forward include robust validation studies, standardization of technical approaches, standardization and further development of analytical algorithms, and large-scale collaborations.
    Critical care (London, England) 02/2012; 16(1):204. DOI:10.1186/cc10537