QT prolongation in the intensive care unit: commonly used medications and the impact of drug-drug interactions.

University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Critical Care Pharmacist, Medical Intensive Care Unit, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, PFG 01-01-01, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (Impact Factor: 2.74). 04/2010; 9(5):699-712. DOI: 10.1517/14740331003739188
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Critically ill patients are at an increased risk to develop drug-drug interactions (DDIs). DDIs that increase the risk of QT prolongation, and ultimately torsades de pointes, can result in a medical emergency. Many clinicians are unaware of the risk of certain drug combinations that may precipitate QT prolongation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Additional DDI education and a review of management strategies could assist with prevention of future adverse outcomes.
This review focuses on some commonly used medications in the ICU that may be involved in pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic DDIs leading to the development of QT prolongation and possibly torsades de pointes. Also, appropriate management strategies are discussed.
The ICU clinician will gain a better understanding of common medications used in the ICU and DDIs that put patients at risk for the development of QT prolongation and torsades de pointes.
Medications that may cause QT prolongation are common in the ICU and DDIs need to be identified and prevented by the clinician to avoid a potentially life-threatening dysrrhythmia.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little is known about clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in respiratory settings. DDIs are more likely to occur in critically ill patients due to complex pharmacotherapy regimens and organ dysfunctions. The aim of this study was to identify the pattern of potential DDIs (pDDIs) occurring in cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) of a pulmonary hospital. A prospective observational study was conducted for six months. All pDDIs for admitted patients in cardiothoracic ICU were identified with Lexi-Interact program and assessed by a clinical pharmacologist. The interacting drugs, reliability, mechanisms, potential outcomes, and clinical management were evaluated for severe and contraindicated interactions. The study included 195 patients. Lung cancer (14.9%) was the most common diagnosis followed by tracheal stenosis (14.3%). The rate of pDDIs was 720.5 /100 patients. Interactions were more commonly observed in transplant patients. 17.7% of pDDIs were considered as severe and contraindicated interactions. Metabolism (54.8%) and additive (24.2%) interactions were the most frequent mechanisms leading to pDDIs, and azole antifungals and fluoroquinolones were the main drug classes involved. The pattern of pDDIs in cardiothoracic ICU differs from other ICU settings. Specialized epidemiological knowledge of drug interactions may help clinical practitioners to reduce the risk of adverse drug events.
    The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 02/2015; 55(2). DOI:10.1002/jcph.421 · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the point prevalence of drug-induced hypotension episodes in critically ill patients, to assess the episodes resulting from error, and to describe how episodes are treated.
    Critical Care Medicine 07/2014; 42(10). DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000000499 · 6.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: STUDY OBJECTIVES: To measure concordance between different intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians and a consensus group of electrophysiology (EP) cardiologists for use of a common rate-corrected QT interval (QTc)-prolonging medication in cases containing different potential risk factor(s) for torsade de pointes (TdP). DESIGN: Prospective case-based evaluation. SETTING: Academic medical center with 320 beds. SUBJECTS: Medical house staff (MDs) and ICU nurses (RNs) from one center and select critical care pharmacists (PHs). INTERVENTION: Completion of a survey containing 10 hypothetical ICU cases in which patients had agitated delirium for which a psychiatrist recommended intravenous haloperidol 5 mg every 6 hours. Each case contained different potential risk factor(s) for TdP in specific combinations. A group of five EP cardiologists agreed that haloperidol use was safe in five cases and not safe in five cases. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For each case, participants were asked to document whether they would administer haloperidol, to provide a rationale for their decision, and to state their level of confidence in that decision. Most clinicians (92 of 115 [80%]) invited to participate completed the cases. Among the five cases where EP cardiologists agreed that haloperidol was not safe, 29% of respondents felt that haloperidol was safe. Conversely, in the five cases where EP cardiologists felt haloperidol was safe, 21% of respondents believed that it was not safe. Overall respondent-EP cardiologist agreement for haloperidol use across the 10 cases was moderate (κ = 0.51). MDs and PHs were in agreement with the EP cardiologists more than RNs (p=0.03). Interprofessional variability existed for the TdP risk factors each best identified. Clinician confidence correlated with EP cardiologist concordance for MDs (p=0.002) and PHs (p=0.0002), but not for RNs (p=0.69). CONCLUSION: When evaluating use of a QTc interval-prolonging medication, ICU clinicians often fail to identify the TdP risk factors that EP cardiologists feel should prevent its use. Clinician-EP cardiologist concordance varies by the specific risk factor(s) for TdP and the ICU professional conducting the assessment.
    Pharmacotherapy 06/2013; 33(6). DOI:10.1002/phar.1242 · 2.20 Impact Factor