Region-based diagnostic performance of multidetector CT for detecting peritoneal seeding in ovarian cancer patients

Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.
Archives of Gynecology (Impact Factor: 1.36). 04/2010; 283(2):353-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1442-0
Source: PubMed


To determine the accuracy of multi-detector CT (MDCT) compared with the surgical findings, such as peritoneal seeding and metastatic lymph nodes, in ovarian cancer patients.
Fifty-seven FIGO stage IA-IV ovarian cancer patients, who underwent MDCT before primary surgery, were included in this study. Two radiologists evaluated the following imaging findings in consensus: the presence of nodular, plaque-like or infiltrative soft-tissue lesions in peritoneal fat or on the serosal surface; presence of ascites; parietal peritoneal thickening or enhancement; and small bowel wall thickening or distortion. We also evaluated the presence of lymph node metastases. To allow region-specific comparisons, the peritoneal cavity was divided into 13 regions and retroperitoneal lymph nodes were divided into 3 regions. Descriptive statistical data were thus obtained.
The MDCT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were 45, 72, 46, and 72%, respectively, for detecting peritoneal seeding and 21, 90, 52, and 69%, respectively, for detecting lymph node metastasis.
MDCT is moderately accurate for detecting peritoneal metastasis and lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer patients.

5 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the diagnostic performances of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET or PET/CT) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with ovarian cancer. Relevant studies were identified with MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1990 to July 2010. We estimated the weighted summary sensitivities, specificities, OR (odds ratio), and summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves of each imaging technique and conducted pair-wise comparisons using the two-sample Z-test. Meta-regression, subgroup analysis, and funnel plots were also performed to explain the between-study heterogeneity. Eighteen eligible studies were included, with a total of 882 patients. PET or PET/CT was a more accurate modality (sensitivity, 73.2%; specificity, 96.7%; OR [odds ratio], 90.32). No significant difference was detected between CT (sensitivity, 42.6%; specificity, 95.0%; OR, 19.87) and MR imaging (sensitivity, 54.7%; specificity, 88.3%; OR, 12.38). Meta-regression analyses and subgroup analyses revealed no statistical difference. Funnel plots with marked asymmetry suggested a publication bias. FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT is more accurate than CT and MR imaging in the detection of lymph node metastasis in patients with ovarian cancer.
    European journal of radiology 02/2011; 81(5):1002-6. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.112 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The standard management for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is optimum cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum based chemotherapy. However, retroperitoneal lymph node resection remains controversial. The multiple directions of the lymph drainage pathway in ovarian cancer have been recognized. The incidence and pattern of lymph node involvement depends on the extent of the disease and the histological type. Several published cohorts suggest the survival benefit of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. A recent large randomized trial have demonstrated the potential benefit for surgical removal of bulky lymph nodes in term of progression-free survival but failed to show any overall survival benefit because of a critical methodology. Further randomised trials are needed to balance risks and benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage disease. CARACO is a French ongoing trial, built to bring a reply to this important question. A huge effort for inclusion of the patients, and involving new teams, are mandatory.
    Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 05/2011; 40(3):201-4. DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.02.009 · 0.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Imaging studies are essential in the evaluation of patients with suspected or known peritoneal malignancy. Despite major advances in imaging technology in the last few years, the early and adequate detection of a peritoneal dissemination remains challenging because of the great variety in size, morphology and location of the peritoneal lesions. New therapeutic approaches in peritoneal-based neoplasms combining cytoreductive surgery and peritonectomy with hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) suggest improved long-term survival, provided that a complete (macroscopic) cytoreduction is achieved. The preoperative radiological assessment of the extent and distribution of peritoneal involvement plays a vital role in the patient selection process. Despite its known limited accuracy in detecting small peritoneal lesions and the involvement of the small bowel/mesentery, contrast-enhanced MDCT remains the standard imaging modality in the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. MRI, especially with diffusion-weighted images, and FDG-PET/CT are promising methods for the evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis with superior results in recent studies, but still have a limited role in selected cases because of high costs and limited availability. Generally, to obtain the most precise readings of peritoneal carcinomatosis, an optimized examination protocol and dedicated radiologists with a deep knowledge of peritoneal pathways and variable morphologies of peritoneal disease are required.
    RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der R 12/2011; 184(3):205-13. DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1281979 · 1.40 Impact Factor
Show more