Region-based diagnostic performance of multidetector CT for detecting peritoneal seeding in ovarian cancer patients.

Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea.
Archives of Gynecology (Impact Factor: 1.28). 04/2010; 283(2):353-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1442-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the accuracy of multi-detector CT (MDCT) compared with the surgical findings, such as peritoneal seeding and metastatic lymph nodes, in ovarian cancer patients.
Fifty-seven FIGO stage IA-IV ovarian cancer patients, who underwent MDCT before primary surgery, were included in this study. Two radiologists evaluated the following imaging findings in consensus: the presence of nodular, plaque-like or infiltrative soft-tissue lesions in peritoneal fat or on the serosal surface; presence of ascites; parietal peritoneal thickening or enhancement; and small bowel wall thickening or distortion. We also evaluated the presence of lymph node metastases. To allow region-specific comparisons, the peritoneal cavity was divided into 13 regions and retroperitoneal lymph nodes were divided into 3 regions. Descriptive statistical data were thus obtained.
The MDCT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were 45, 72, 46, and 72%, respectively, for detecting peritoneal seeding and 21, 90, 52, and 69%, respectively, for detecting lymph node metastasis.
MDCT is moderately accurate for detecting peritoneal metastasis and lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer patients.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to determine the patterns of erroneous interpretation of preoperative computed tomography (CT) for detection of peritoneal lesions in advanced ovarian cancer. Between 2007 and 2011, 148 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer, who underwent multi-detector-row CT before primary cytoreduction, were enrolled. We reviewed the preoperative CT and compared the findings with the surgical findings. For the discrepant cases, false-negative cases were reevaluated after revealing of surgical findings and were categorized as either absence or presence of lesion (missed case). We performed region-based comparisons according to predefined peritoneal lesion locations. Sixty-eight false-negative cases were identified, of which 43 were revealed to be initially missed cases. The most common locations were found to be the small-bowel mesentery (21%), subdiaphragmatic space (19%), and porta hepatis (16%). The missed peritoneal implants commonly resided in the same sites of preoperative imaging criteria that could predict suboptimal primary cytoreduction.
    Journal of computer assisted tomography 01/2013; 37(4):568-71. DOI:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31828b683b · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The standard management for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is optimum cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum based chemotherapy. However, retroperitoneal lymph node resection remains controversial. The multiple directions of the lymph drainage pathway in ovarian cancer have been recognized. The incidence and pattern of lymph node involvement depends on the extent of the disease and the histological type. Several published cohorts suggest the survival benefit of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. A recent large randomized trial have demonstrated the potential benefit for surgical removal of bulky lymph nodes in term of progression-free survival but failed to show any overall survival benefit because of a critical methodology. Further randomised trials are needed to balance risks and benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage disease. CARACO is a French ongoing trial, built to bring a reply to this important question. A huge effort for inclusion of the patients, and involving new teams, are mandatory.
    Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 05/2011; 40(3):201-4. DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.02.009 · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Imaging studies are essential in the evaluation of patients with suspected or known peritoneal malignancy. Despite major advances in imaging technology in the last few years, the early and adequate detection of a peritoneal dissemination remains challenging because of the great variety in size, morphology and location of the peritoneal lesions. New therapeutic approaches in peritoneal-based neoplasms combining cytoreductive surgery and peritonectomy with hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) suggest improved long-term survival, provided that a complete (macroscopic) cytoreduction is achieved. The preoperative radiological assessment of the extent and distribution of peritoneal involvement plays a vital role in the patient selection process. Despite its known limited accuracy in detecting small peritoneal lesions and the involvement of the small bowel/mesentery, contrast-enhanced MDCT remains the standard imaging modality in the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. MRI, especially with diffusion-weighted images, and FDG-PET/CT are promising methods for the evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis with superior results in recent studies, but still have a limited role in selected cases because of high costs and limited availability. Generally, to obtain the most precise readings of peritoneal carcinomatosis, an optimized examination protocol and dedicated radiologists with a deep knowledge of peritoneal pathways and variable morphologies of peritoneal disease are required.
    RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der R 12/2011; 184(3):205-13. DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1281979 · 1.96 Impact Factor