Article

National Dissemination of Supported Housing in the VA: Model Adherence versus Model Modification

Yale Department of Psychiatry, Yale Program for Recovery and Community Health 319 Peck St. Building 1 New Haven, CT 06513, USA.
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (Impact Factor: 1.16). 01/2010; 33(4):308-19. DOI: 10.2975/33.4.2010.308.319
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The continuing development and dissemination of emerging evidence-based practices may be facilitated by the availability of descriptive information on the actual delivery of the service, and its variability, across sites. This paper presents data on the participation of 2,925 homeless veterans in the Housing and Urban Development-Veterans Affairs Supported Housing (HUD-VASH) program at 36 sites across the country, for up to five years. While most conceptual models emphasize rapid placement, sustained intensive case management, rehabilitation services, and "permanent" housing, no program has yet presented empirical data on the actual delivery of such services over an extended period of time.
Using extensive longitudinal data from the VA's national homeless outreach program, the Health Care for Homeless Veterans (HCHV) program, a quantitative portrait presents what happens in supported housing in a large real-world dissemination effort.
Program entry to HUD-VASH was generally slow with 108 days (sd = 92 days) on average passing between program entry and housing placement. Total program participation lasted 2.6 years on average (sd = 1.6 years)-just half of the possible 5 years. Service delivery became substantially less intensive over time by several measures, and three-fourths of the veterans terminated within five years, although the vast majority (82%) were housed at the time. Few veterans received rehabilitation services (6%) or employment assistance (17%) and most service delivery focused on obtaining housing.
These data suggest that real-world supported housing programs may not adhere to the prevalent model descriptions either because of implementation failure or because veteran needs and preferences differ from those suggested by that model.

0 Followers
 · 
55 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is quickly becoming a leader in psychosocial rehabilitation and in implementing evidence–based practices for people with severe mental illnesses. Transformation efforts within the VA system also emphasize that veterans with mental illnesses are to be respected as persons and not defined by their illness; they have the right to direct their own treatment and are encouraged to develop a recovery oriented action plan for themselves. Peer Support Services are provided by trained individuals who themselves are in recovery from a mental illness and who serve as clinically supervised members of the mental health care team. Partnering with families, with the veteran's consent, is an essential component of recovery-oriented services. A range of vocational experiences and employment are offered to help veterans achieve their goals and enhance their quality of life. We hope that the work included in this Special Issue of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation journal inspires others to contribute to the advancement of recovery–oriented services and supports for veterans and other adults living with serious mental illnesses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved)
    Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 01/2010; 33(4):255-8. DOI:10.2975/33.4.2010.255.258 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Housing and Urban Development-Department of Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program is the largest supported housing program in the country for homeless veterans who are seeking rapid entry into permanent independent housing. This study examined factors related to how rapidly clients were housed in the early years of the program and how long they stayed in the program. Mental health, substance abuse, work/income, criminal history, and site were examined as predictors of process times. Regression analyses based on 627 HUD-VASH clients who entered the program between 1992 and 2003 showed that client characteristics were not rate-limiting factors for obtaining HUD-VASH housing; i.e., clients who had greater substance abuse problems or more extensive criminal histories did not take longer to obtain housing. The large differences associated with site of entry partly reflected a curvilinear relationship between the duration of operation of the HUD-VASH program and process times; i.e., at relatively younger and older programs, clients entered housing slightly faster than at programs in the middle range. Lastly, HUD-VASH clients whose case managers reported good therapeutic alliances stayed in the program longer. These findings have implications for the continued expansion of the HUD-VASH program.
    The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 01/2011; 48(7):755-62. DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0178 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A group-intensive peer support (GIPS) model of case management for supported housing initiatives is proposed. The principles behind the model and initial experiences with its implementation are described. To promote social reintegration and recovery, GIPS provides housing subsidies and is clinically based on group meetings as the default mode of case management, relying on individual community-based case management interventions on an as-needed basis. The process of finding and sustaining independent housing is articulated as a 21-step process in which peers coach and support one another in achieving each of the steps. The GIPS model has been implemented at the Connecticut VA by five full-time case managers serving approximately 80 veterans. Group meetings are conducted four times a week at various locations ranging in size from three to 25 clients per group. Groups helped maintain frequent contact with clients, minimized staff travel time, and fostered client information-sharing, peer support, and community adaptation. Case vignettes from three different phases of GIPS are used to illustrate the potential benefit for both client well-being and more efficient use of staff time. GIPS is a conceptually promising alternative approach that may be of special value in large multisite programs because it promotes peer support, staff efficiency, and client social reintegration.
    Psychological Services 08/2011; 8(3):251-259. DOI:10.1037/a0024837 · 1.08 Impact Factor
Show more