Article

Magnetization transfer imaging provides a quantitative measure of chondrogenic differentiation and tissue development.

Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Tissue Engineering Part C Methods (Impact Factor: 4.64). 04/2010; 16(6):1407-15. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0777
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The goal of the present investigation was to test whether quantitative magnetization transfer imaging can be used as a noninvasive evaluation method for engineered cartilage. In this work, we used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor the chondrogenesis of stem-cell-based engineered tissue over a 3-week period by measuring on a pixel-by-pixel basis the relaxation times (T₁ and T₂), the apparent diffusion coefficient, and the magnetization transfer parameters: bound proton fraction and cross-relaxation rate (k). Tissue-engineered constructs for generating cartilage were created by seeding mesenchymal stem cells in a gelatin sponge. Every 7 days, tissue samples were analyzed using MRI, histological, and biochemical methods. The MRI measurements were verified by histological analysis, and the imaging data were correlated with biochemical analysis of the developing cartilage matrix for glycosaminoglycan content. The MRI analysis for bound proton fraction and k showed a statistically significant increase that was correlated with the increase of glycosaminoglycan (R = 0.96 and 0.87, respectively, p < 0.05), whereas T₁, T₂, and apparent diffusion coefficient results did not show any significant changes over the 3-week measurement period.

0 Followers
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tissue engineering has evolved with multifaceted research being conducted using advanced technologies, and it is progressing towards clinical applications. As tissue engineering technology significantly advances, it proceeds towards increasing sophistication, including nanoscale strategies for material construction and synergetic methods for combining with cells, growth factors, or other macromolecules. Therefore, in order to assess advanced tissue engineered constructs, tissue engineers need versatile imaging methods capable of monitoring not only morphological but also functional and molecular information. However, there is no single imaging modality that is suitable for all tissue engineered constructs. Each imaging method has its own range of applications and provides information based on the specific properties of the imaging technique. Therefore, according to the requirements of the tissue engineering studies, the most appropriate tool should be selected among a variety of imaging modalities. The goal of this review paper is to describe available biomedical imaging methods to assess tissue engineering applications and to provide tissue engineers with criteria and insights for determining the best imaging strategies. Commonly used biomedical imaging modalities, including X-ray and computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound imaging, optical imaging, and emerging techniques and multimodal imaging, will be discussed, focusing on the latest trends of their applications in recent tissue engineering studies.
    Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews 07/2014; DOI:10.1089/ten.TEB.2014.0180 · 4.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evaluation of mechanical characteristics of cartilage by magnetic resonance imaging would provide a noninvasive measure of tissue quality both for tissue engineering and when monitoring clinical response to therapeutic interventions for cartilage degradation. We use results from multiexponential transverse relaxation analysis to predict equilibrium and dynamic stiffness of control and degraded bovine nasal cartilage, a biochemical model for articular cartilage. Sulfated glycosaminoglycan concentration/wet weight (ww) and equilibrium and dynamic stiffness decreased with degradation from 103.6 ± 37.0 µg/mg ww, 1.71 ± 1.10 MPa and 15.3 ± 6.7 MPa in controls to 8.25 ± 2.4 µg/mg ww, 0.015 ± 0.006 MPa and 0.89 ± 0.25MPa, respectively, in severely degraded explants. Magnetic resonance measurements were performed on cartilage explants at 4 °C in a 9.4 T wide-bore NMR spectrometer using a Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence. Multiexponential T2 analysis revealed four water compartments with T2 values of approximately 0.14, 3, 40 and 150 ms, with corresponding weight fractions of approximately 3, 2, 4 and 91%. Correlations between weight fractions and stiffness based on conventional univariate and multiple linear regressions exhibited a maximum r(2) of 0.65, while those based on support vector regression (SVR) had a maximum r(2) value of 0.90. These results indicate that (i) compartment weight fractions derived from multiexponential analysis reflect cartilage stiffness and (ii) SVR-based multivariate regression exhibits greatly improved accuracy in predicting mechanical properties as compared with conventional regression. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
    NMR in Biomedicine 04/2014; 27(4). DOI:10.1002/nbm.3083 · 3.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To compare quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) parameters of patellar cartilage measured using cross-relaxation imaging (CRI) in asymptomatic volunteers and patients with osteoarthritis. Design: The study was performed with Institutional Review Board approval and with all subjects signing informed consent. CRI of the knee joint was performed at 3.0T on 20 asymptomatic volunteers and 11 patients with osteoarthritis. The fraction of macromolecular bound protons (f), the exchange rate constant between macromolecular bound protons and free water protons (k), and the T-2 relaxation time of macromolecular bound protons (T-2(B)) of patellar cartilage were measured. Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare qMT parameters between asymptomatic volunteers and patients with osteoarthritis. Results: Average f, k, and T-2(B) of patellar cartilage was 12.46%, 7.22 s(-1), and 6.49 mu s respectively for asymptomatic volunteers and 12.80%, 6.13 s(-1), and 6.80 mu s respectively for patients with osteoarthritis. There were statistically significant differences between groups of subjects for k (P < 0.01) and T-2(B) (P < 0.0001) but not f (P = 0.38) of patellar cartilage. Conclusion: Patients with osteoarthritis had significantly lower k and significantly higher T-2(B) of patellar cartilage than asymptomatic volunteers which suggests that qMT parameters can detect changes in the macromolecular matrix of degenerative cartilage.
    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 10/2014; 22(10):1568-76. DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.004 · 4.66 Impact Factor