Revista del Hospital Materno Infantil Ramón Sardá 01/2009;
Source: DOAJ


Objetivo: Investigar el uso de prácticas benéficas de atención materna y perinatal en una red de hospitales maternales públicos de Argentina. Método: Estudio descriptivo prospectivo multicéntrico de 6.661 partos en 9 hospitales. Se evaluó el uso de 5 prácticas de atención obstétrica que reducen la morbilidad y la mortalidad materna y perinatal. Resultados: Las medianas de los porcentajes de uso para las prácticas seleccionadas fueron las siguientes: asistencia continua de la paciente durante el parto (17,9%), administración de corticosteroides en los casos de parto prematuro (35,3%), evitación de la episiotomía para las madres primigestas (41,2%), suplemento de hierro y folato (52,5%), manejo activo de la tercera etapa del trabajo de parto (93,5%). Conclusión: En los hospitales públicos de la Argentina, la frecuencia de uso de las prácticas maternas y perinatales basadas en evidencia seleccionadas es baja, además de haber una gran variación entre los distintos hospitales y dentro de cada uno de ellos. Debería fomentarse el uso de estas prácticas basadas en evidencia.

Download full-text


Available from: José M Belizán, Sep 29, 2015
22 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major difficulties arise when introducing evidence and clinical guidelines into routine daily practice. Data show that many patients do not receive appropriate care, or receive unnecessary or harmful care. Many approaches claim to offer solutions to this problem; which ones are as yet the most effective and efficient is unclear. We aim to provide an overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice. Substantial evidence suggests that to change behaviour is possible, but this change generally requires comprehensive approaches at different levels (doctor, team practice, hospital, wider environment), tailored to specific settings and target groups. Plans for change should be based on characteristics of the evidence or guideline itself and barriers and facilitators to change. In general, evidence shows that none of the approaches for transferring evidence to practice is superior to all changes in all situations.
    The Lancet 10/2003; 362(9391):1225-30. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1 · 45.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little is known of common normal labor hospital practices in Egypt or of their relationship to evidence-based obstetrics. This study documented facility-based practices for normal labor and delivery in Egypt for the first time by categorizing 44 practices observed in a busy obstetric teaching hospital according to the World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Working Group on Normal Birth classification of normal birth practices. A multidisciplinary approach combined directly observing practices that were applied to individual laboring women and their newborns, observing ward activities, interviews, and focus groups. One hundred seventy-five normal births were observed in their entirety, over 28 days and nights, by medically trained observers using an observation checklist that documented 537 variables for each woman. Mothers were interviewed postpartum, and findings were shared with practitioners for their feedback. Observed practices were categorized according the 1999 WHO classification of 59 practices for normal birth, depending on their usefulness, effectiveness, or harmfulness. There was infrequent use of beneficial practices that should be encouraged and an unexpectedly high level of harmful practices that should be eliminated. Some beneficial practices were applied inappropriately, and practices of unproved benefit were also documented, some of which are potentially harmful to childbearing mothers and their babies. Hospital practices for normal labor were largely not in accordance with the WHO evidence-based classification of practices for normal birth. The findings are worrying, given the increasing proportion of hospital-based births in Egypt and the country's improved but relatively high maternal and neonatal mortality rates. Obstacles to following evidence-based protocols for normal labor require examination.
    Birth 01/2006; 32(4):283-90. DOI:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00385.x · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To estimate the prevalence of awareness and use of evidence-based reproductive health interventions and to describe the barriers associated with the use of evidence-based interventions among health providers in north-west Cameroon. In February 2004, a population-based descriptive study of the awareness and use of 13 evidence-based interventions targeted health workers providing reproductive health care. Their awareness and use of a composite of four vital interventions was also evaluated. These were peripartum use of antiretrovirals to prevent transmission of HIV, antenatal corticosteroid administration, magnesium sulfate prophylaxis and active management of placental delivery with uterotonics. In-depth interviews with key informants were conducted as part of a qualitative substudy to discover the barriers to the use of evidence-based interventions. Overall, 91.4% (328/359) of reproductive health workers were surveyed. Their awareness of evidence-based interventions varied from 29% for the use of antenatal corticosteroids to 97% for the use of iron and folic acid supplementation during pregnancy. Their use of these interventions ranged from 10.2% for antenatal corticosteroids to 94.8% for iron and folic acid supplementation. Only 50/322 (15.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI)=11.8-20.0) of health workers were aware of all four vital interventions, and only 12/312 (3.8%; 95% CI=2.0- 6.6) reported using all of them regularly. A total of 26 key informants participated in the qualitative substudy. A deficiency in the education and training of health workers, especially a lack of continuing education, was commonly identified as the most important barrier to their awareness of evidence-based practices. A lack of awareness and a lack of supplies and materials were the main barriers to practice. The awareness and practice of important evidence-based reproductive health interventions were less than optimal. To improve maternal and perinatal outcomes both remedial programmes to enhance awareness, including continuing education for health workers, and the provision of necessary supplies are needed.
    Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 01/2006; 83(12):895-903. DOI:10.1590/S0042-96862005001200011 · 5.09 Impact Factor
Show more