Article

Platelets regulate lymphatic vascular development through CLEC-2-SLP-76 signaling.

Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, 421 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Blood (Impact Factor: 9.78). 04/2010; 116(4):661-70. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-270876
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although platelets appear by embryonic day 10.5 in the developing mouse, an embryonic role for these cells has not been identified. The SYK-SLP-76 signaling pathway is required in blood cells to regulate embryonic blood-lymphatic vascular separation, but the cell type and molecular mechanism underlying this regulatory pathway are not known. In the present study we demonstrate that platelets regulate lymphatic vascular development by directly interacting with lymphatic endothelial cells through C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2) receptors. PODOPLANIN (PDPN), a transmembrane protein expressed on the surface of lymphatic endothelial cells, is required in nonhematopoietic cells for blood-lymphatic separation. Genetic loss of the PDPN receptor CLEC-2 ablates PDPN binding by platelets and confers embryonic lymphatic vascular defects like those seen in animals lacking PDPN or SLP-76. Platelet factor 4-Cre-mediated deletion of Slp-76 is sufficient to confer lymphatic vascular defects, identifying platelets as the cell type in which SLP-76 signaling is required to regulate lymphatic vascular development. Consistent with these genetic findings, we observe SLP-76-dependent platelet aggregate formation on the surface of lymphatic endothelial cells in vivo and ex vivo. These studies identify a nonhemostatic pathway in which platelet CLEC-2 receptors bind lymphatic endothelial PDPN and activate SLP-76 signaling to regulate embryonic vascular development.

Full-text

Available from: Matthias Stadtfeld, Jan 21, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
128 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the effect of (lymph)angiogenic cytokines on hematopoietic cells involved in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Like angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis occurs in pathophysiological conditions but not in healthy adults. AML is closely associated with the vasculature system, and the interplay between lymphangiogenic cytokines maintains leukemic blast survival in the bone marrow (BM). Once AML is induced, proangiogenic cytokines function as angiogenic or lymphangiogenic factors and affect hematopoietic cells, including BM-derived immune cells. Simultaneously, the representative cytokines, VEGFs and their receptors are expressed on AML blasts in vascular and osteoblast niches in both the BM and the peripheral circulation. After exposure to (lymph)angiogenic cytokines in leukemogenesis and infiltration, immune cell phenotypes and functions are affected. These dynamic behaviors in the BM reflect the clinical features of AML. In this review, we note the importance of lymphangiogenic factors and their receptors in hematopoietic cells in AML. Understanding the functional characterization of (lymph)angiogenic factors in the BM niche in AML will also be helpful in interrupting the engraftment of leukemic stem cells and for enhancing immune cell function by modulating the tumor microenvironment.
    Experimental and Molecular Medicine 11/2014; 46:e122. DOI:10.1038/emm.2014.72 · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have used a novel knock-in mouse to investigate the effect of disruption of phospho-tyrosine binding of the N-terminal SH2 domain of Syk on platelet activation by GPVI, CLEC-2 and integrin αIIbβ3. The Syk(R41Afl/fl) mouse was crossed to a PF4-Cre(+) mouse to induce expression of the Syk mutant in the megakaryocyte/platelet lineage. Syk(R41Afl/fl;PF4-Cre) mice are born at approximately 50% of the expected frequency and have a similar phenotype to Syk(fl/fl;PF4-Cre) mice, including blood-lymphatic mixing and chyloascites. Anastomosis of the venous and lymphatic vasculatures can be seen in the mesenteric circulation accounting for rapid and continuous mixing of the two vasculatures. Platelet activation by CLEC-2 and GPVI is abolished in Syk(R41Afl/fl;PF4-Cre) platelets. Syk phosphorylation on Tyr519/20 is blocked in CLEC-2 stimulated platelets suggesting a model in which binding of Syk via its N-terminal SH2 domain regulates autophosphorylation. In contrast, outside-in signalling by integrin αIIbβ3 is not altered but is inhibited in the presence of inhibitors of Src and Syk tyrosine kinases. These results demonstrate that in mice, αIIbβ3 regulates Syk through an ITAM-independent pathway, and provide novel insight into the course of events underlying Syk activation and hemITAM phosphorylation by CLEC-2.
    Blood 10/2014; DOI:10.1182/blood-2014-05-579375 · 9.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The interaction of CLEC-2 on platelets with Podoplanin on lymphatic endothelial cells initiates platelet signalling events that are necessary for prevention of blood-lymph mixing during development. In the present study, we show that CLEC-2 signalling via Src family and Syk tyrosine kinases promotes platelet adhesion to primary mouse lymphatic endothelial cells at low shear. Using supported lipid bilayers containing mobile Podoplanin, we further show that activation of Src and Syk in platelets promotes clustering of CLEC-2 and Podoplanin. Clusters of CLEC-2-bound Podoplanin migrate rapidly to the centre of the platelet to form a single structure. Fluorescence life-time imaging demonstrates that molecules within these clusters are within 10 nm of one another and that the clusters are disrupted by inhibition of Src and Syk family kinases. CLEC-2 clusters are also seen in platelets adhered to immobilised Podoplanin using direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM). These findings provide mechanistic insight by which CLEC-2 signalling promotes adhesion to Podoplanin and regulation of Podoplanin signalling thereby contributing to lymphatic vasculature development.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 11/2014; 289(52). DOI:10.1074/jbc.M114.584284 · 4.60 Impact Factor