Article

Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and population-based research in urologic oncology: An overview

Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Urologic Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.36). 04/2010; 30(2):126-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program is a commonly used data source in cancer research. This article provides an introduction to the SEER database, describes important data items available from SEER on the most commonly diagnosed urologic malignancies (prostate, bladder, and kidney cancers), and reviews limitations of SEER data for urologic oncology research.

1 Follower
 · 
103 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and accounts for significant morbidity and mortality in the western world. While traditional therapies are effective at clearing early stage cancer, they often fail to treat late stage metastatic disease. Thus, an effective therapy that targets prostate tumor growth and metastasis is desired for alleviating the disease and improving patient outcomes. Natural extracts have been the focus of recent investigation, particularly those with reduced cellular toxicity to healthy tissue. In this review, we discuss one potential candidate, gano-deric acid, an extract from the Ganoderma lucidum mushroom that has been tested in multiple cancer models. Interest-ingly, ganoderic acid DM (GA-DM) has shown toxicity to both androgen-dependent and independent prostate cancer cells with reduced osteoclastogenesis in late stage metastatic disease. This review will discuss the current knowledge on this GA-DM extract and the potential benefit in treating advanced prostate cancer. We will also provide an overview on the targeted delivery of GA-DM through nanoparticles that would reduce bystander toxicity and improve the drug's effective-ness. An improved understanding of this drug and its uses will advance the field of natural chemotherapeutics, particularly in treating advanced prostate cancer.
    The Open Prostate Cancer Journal 10/2010; 3:78-85. DOI:10.2174/1876822901003010078
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the performance of the Isbarn nomogram for predicting 90-day mortality following radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. We identified 1141 consecutive radical cystectomy patients treated at our institution between 1995 and 2005 with at least 90 days of follow-up. We applied the published nomogram to our cohort, determining its discrimination, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration. We further compared it with a simple model using age and the Charlson comorbidity score. Our cohort was similar to that used to develop the Isbarn nomogram in terms of age, gender, grade and histology; however, we observed a higher organ-confined (≤pT2, N0) rate (52% vs 24%) and a lower overall 90-day mortality rate [2.8% (95% confidence interval 1.9%, 3.9%) vs 3.9%]. The Isbarn nomogram predicted individual 90-day mortality in our cohort with moderate discrimination [AUC 73.8% (95% confidence interval 64.4%, 83.2%)]. In comparison, a model using age and Charlson score alone had a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 70.2% (95% confidence interval 67.2%, 75.4%). The Isbarn nomogram showed moderate discrimination in our cohort; however, the exclusion of important preoperative comorbidity variables and the use of postoperative pathological stage limit its utility in the preoperative setting. The use of a simple model combining age and Charlson score yielded similar discriminatory ability and underscores the significance of individual patient variables in predicting outcomes. An accurate tool for predicting postoperative morbidity/mortality following radical cystectomy would be valuable for treatment planning and counselling. Future nomogram design should be based on preoperative variables including individual risk factors, such as comorbidities.
    BJU International 07/2011; 109(6):855-9. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10391.x · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To estimate the average loss in life expectancy (LE) due to bladder cancer (BC) in men and women in the USA. Cancer records for 51,528 patients diagnosed with BC during 1988-1997 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Potential follow-up ranged from 10 to 20 years (median 14 years). Loss in median LE at BC diagnosis was computed as the difference between expected median survival and observed median survival. Expected survival was calculated using two methods: method 1 used age, sex, and race-specific LE in the general population, method 2 used the hazard of death from non-BC causes in patients with BC (to account for past exposures and treatment-related toxicities not present in the general population). During the study period, BC death occurred in 17% of men and 23% of women and non-BC death occurred in 53% of men and 47% of women. Using LE in the general population as the reference (method 1), loss in median LE at BC diagnosis was 3.9 years for men (33% of their potential remaining years of life) and 6.5 years for women (47% of their potential remaining years of life). Using non-BC-specific hazard as the reference (method 2), loss in median LE was 2.7 years for men (26% of their potential remaining years of life) and 4.1 years for women (36% of their potential remaining years of life). Compared with men, women loose more years of life and a greater fraction of their life expectancy to BC.
    BJU International 08/2011; 109(1):57-62. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10318.x · 3.13 Impact Factor