Conference Paper

Dipole estimation errors in EEG source localization due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities of white matter in realistic head models

Ghent Univ., Ghent
DOI: 10.1109/NFSI-ICFBI.2007.4387695 Conference: Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging of the Brain and Heart and the International Conference on Functional Biomedical Imaging, 2007. NFSI-ICFBI 2007. Joint Meeting of the 6th International Symposium on
Source: IEEE Xplore

ABSTRACT The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a useful tool in the diagnosis of epilepsy. EEG source localization can provide neurologists with an estimation of the epileptogenic zone. Many EEG source localization approaches assume head models with isotropic conductivity, while in reality the conductivity of white matter is anisotropic. The conductivity along the nerve bundle is higher than the conductivity perpendicular to the nerve bundle. Using diffusion weighted magnetic resonance images (DW-MRI), we can determine the directions the anisotropic diffusion. Using the latter we can derive the anisotropic conductivity tensor. These anisotropic conductivities can be fused with the realistic head model, derived from MR images. Using a grid of dipoles, placed in white and grey matter regions, we can compare the head model with white matter anisotropy with a head model with isotropic conductivity for the white matter compartment. As quantification measures we used the dipole location and orientation error. Results show that the location error was very small in both white and grey matter regions (<5 mm). The dipole orientation error had a mean of 3.8 degrees and 6.1 degrees in grey and white matter regions. This would indicate that the systematical error due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities of white matter is very small.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated the influence of using simplified skull models on electroencephalogram (EEG) source localization. The simplified skull models were derived from CT and MR images, with isotropic conductivity modeled as either heterogeneous or homogeneous. A total of four simplified head models were compared against a reference model with a skull accurately segmented with CT images. Our results show that the use of a simplified geometry for the skull, can lead to errors of approximately 1 cm for sources located in the central and temporal regions of the brain.
    Conference proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference 07/2013; 2013:3295-3298.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of white matter (WM) and skull inhomogeneous anisotropic tissue conductivities on human head modeling. The inhomogeneity of WM and skull is included using fractional anisotropy (FA) method and the anisotropy is included according to volume constraint in the head model construction. A five-layered spherical head model implemented using finite element method (FEM) is used as a volume conductor with a known current source to measure the electroencephalogram (EEG) on the head surface. Statistical measurement techniques are applied to analyze the EEGs obtained from inhomogeneous anisotropic head models and a homogeneous isotropic model. This study finds that the effects of WM and skull inhomogeneous anisotropy on EEG are significant.
    Computer and Information Technology, 2008. ICCIT 2008. 11th International Conference on; 01/2009
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we provide a broad overview of models and technologies pertaining to transcranial current brain stimulation (tCS), a family of related non-invasive techniques including direct current (tDCS), alternating current (tACS) and random noise current stimulation (tRNS). These techniques are based on the delivery of weak currents through the scalp (with electrode current intensity to area ratios of about 0.3-5 A/m2) at low frequencies (typically < 1 kHz) resulting in weak electric fields in the brain (with amplitudes of about 0.2-2 V/m). Here we review the biophysics and simulation of non-invasive, current-controlled generation of electric fields in the human brain and the models for the interaction of these electric fields with neurons, including a survey of in-vitro and in-vivo related studies. Finally, we outline directions for future fundamental and technological research.
    IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 05/2013; 21(3):333-345. · 2.82 Impact Factor