Article

Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma

Department of Surgery, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
American journal of surgery (Impact Factor: 2.41). 04/2010; 199(4):554-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients with penetrating injuries are known to have worse outcomes than those with blunt trauma. We hypothesize that within each injury mechanism there should be no outcome difference between insured and uninsured patients.
The National Trauma Data Bank version 7 was analyzed. Patients aged 65 years and older and burn patients were excluded. The insurance status was categorized as insured (private, government/military, or Medicaid) and uninsured. Multivariate analysis adjusted for insurance status, mechanism of injury, age, race, sex, injury severity score, shock, head injury, extremity injury, teaching hospital status, and year.
A total of 1,203,243 patients were analyzed, with a mortality rate of 3.7%. The death rate was significantly higher in penetrating trauma patients versus blunt trauma patients (7.9% vs 3.0%; P < .001), and higher in the uninsured (5.3% vs 3.2%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, uninsured patients had an increased odds of death than insured patients, in both penetrating and blunt trauma patients. Penetrating trauma patients with insurance still had a greater risk of death than blunt trauma patients without insurance.
Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcome in both penetrating and blunt trauma.

0 Followers
 · 
129 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A retrospective registry review of adult patients admitted to a Level I trauma center sought to determine whether results regarding in-hospital mortality associated with payer source vary on the basis of methodology. Patients were categorized into 4 literature-derived definitions (Definition 1: insured and uninsured; Definition 2: commercially insured, publicly insured, and uninsured; Definition 3: commercially insured, Medicaid, Medicare, and uninsured; and Definition 4: commercially insured, Medicaid, and uninsured). In-hospital mortality differences were found in Definitions 2 and 3, and when reclassifying dual-eligible Medicare/Medicaid into socioeconomic and age indicators. Variations in methodology culminated in results that could be interpreted with differing conclusions.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spine trauma patients may represent a group for whom insurance fails to provide protection from catastrophic medical expenses, resulting in the transfer of financial burden onto individual families and public payers. This study compares the rate of insurance discontinuation for patients who underwent surgery for traumatic spine injury with and without spinal cord injury with the rate for matched control subjects. We used the MarketScan database to perform a retrospective cohort study of privately insured spine trauma patients who underwent surgery from 2006 to 2010. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the time to insurance discontinuation. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to determine hazard ratios for insurance discontinuation among spine trauma patients compared with the matched control population. The median duration of existing insurance coverage was 20.2 months for those with traumatic spinal cord injury, 25.6 months for those with traumatic spine injury without spinal cord injury, and 48.0 months for the matched control cohort (log-rank p < 0.0001). After controlling for multiple covariates, the hazard ratios for discontinuation of insurance were 2.02 (95% CI [confidence interval], 1.83 to 2.23) and 2.78 (95% CI, 2.31 to 3.35) for the trauma patients without and with spinal cord injury, respectively, compared with matched controls. Rates of insurance discontinuation are significantly higher for trauma patients with severe spine injury compared with the uninjured population, indicating that patients with disabling injuries are at increased risk for loss of insurance coverage. Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To quantify racial/ethnic differences in outcome after emergency general surgery (EGS). Patients receiving a representative EGS (colectomy, small bowel resection, or ulcer repair operation) performed within the first 24 hours of hospital admission were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2000 and 2008. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the overall disparity in odds of death between African Americans (AAs) and Caucasians. Hierarchical models were then used to evaluate association of hospital-level factors and death after EGS. A total of 116,344 patients were identified. AA patients had 10% higher odds of dying after EGS than Caucasian patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.10, P = .02). All patients treated at hospitals with greater than 6% AA EGS patients had higher odds of death than those at hospitals with fewer percentage of AA EGS patients (adjusted odds ratio 1.16 to 1.42, P < .002). There is racial/ethnic disparity in outcome after selected EGS; however, this disparity is explained by hospital-level factors. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    The American Journal of Surgery 01/2015; 209(4). DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.11.005 · 2.41 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
48 Downloads
Available from
Jun 6, 2014