Article

COX2 expression in prognosis and in prediction to endocrine therapy in early breast cancer patients.

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (Impact Factor: 4.47). 04/2010; 125(3):671-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0854-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In breast cancer, the prognostic impact of COX2 expression varies widely between studies. We examined the prognostic value of COX2 expression in a large cohort of breast cancer patients treated with primary surgery between 1985 and 1994 and explained the variable results of COX2 expression found in the literature. A tissue microarray was constructed of available tumour material, and ER, PgR, HER2, Ki67 and COX2 were examined by immunohistochemistry. Median follow-up was 19 years. Fifty-five percent (n = 369/677) of patients received no systemic treatment. COX2 was scored using a weighted histoscore. Analysis of COX2 expression in two groups based on the median (148; below vs. above) showed an increased hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 (95% CI 1.05-1.75, P = 0.021) for disease-free survival (DFS) and of 1.39 (95% CI 1.03-1.82, P = 0.016) for overall survival (OS). However, COX2 did not remain independent in multivariate analysis. In patients with hormone receptor positive tumours, COX2 expression had a negative influence on outcome (low vs. high: DFS: HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.76, P = 0.013). This effect disappeared when endocrine therapy was administered (low vs. high: DFS: HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.51-1.70, P = 0.811) while it remained statistically significant when endocrine therapy was omitted (low vs. high: DFS: HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.94, P = 0.005). Our results show that COX2 plays a role in hormonal pathways. Our results can explain the results found in previously published studies.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
128 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: COX2 expression correlates with high-grade breast cancer, but the clinical significance and possible prognostic influence in these patients have not been studied in depth. Our goal was to evaluate the significance of COX2 expression in a group of patients with high-grade breast cancer. Three hundred and three patients (median age 55; age range 25-95 years) with high-grade breast cancer entered this retrospective study. Mean follow-up was 65.2 months (4-179 months). COX2 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry. The distribution of patients with high-grade tumors according to staining for COX2 was as follows: score 0-28/303 (9.3 %); score 1-101/303 (33.3 %); score 2-114/303 (37.6 %); score 3-60/303 (19.8 %). Patients with score 2 and 3 were classified as COX2 positive (174 of 303 patients (57.4 %). There was no correlation between any clinicopathological pattern, ER, PR, Her2 status and COX2 expression. In the group of patients with triple-negative breast cancer, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 58.3 % for patients with COX2 expression compared with 83.9 % for patients without COX2 expression (P = 0.042). COX2 expression did not provide any prognostic significance for the other biological subtypes of breast cancer with high-grade histological features.
    Medical Oncology 06/2014; 31(6):989. · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the distribution and prognostic effect of the breast cancer molecular subtypes in young and elderly breast cancer patients. Our study population (n = 822) consisted of all early breast cancer patients primarily treated with surgery in our center between 1985 and 1996. A total of 142/822 fresh frozen tissues were available with good quality RNA and analyzed by gene expression microarray. Gene expression molecular subtypes were determined by correlation to the expression centroids of 534 "intrinsic" genes. Sections of a tissue micro array containing formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue of 714/822 patients were immunohistochemically (IHC) stained for Ki67, EGFR, CK5/6. Tumor expression of ER, PR, HER2 was previously determined. IHC molecular subtypes were defined based on expression of these markers: Luminal A: ER+ and/or PR+, HER2- and Ki67-; Luminal B: ER+ and/or PR+ and ki67+; ERBB2: ER-, PR- and HER2+; Basal-like: ER-, PR-, HER2- and EGFR+ and/or CK5/6+; Unclassified: ER-, PR-, HER2-, EGFR- and CK5/6-. IHC molecular subtypes were validated against gene expression defined molecular subtypes. Assessment of distribution and prognostic effect of molecular subtypes was stratified to age (<65 versus ≥65 years). Validation of molecular subtypes determined by IHC against gene expression revealed a substantial agreement in classification (Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.75). A statistically significant association (p = 0.02) was found between molecular subtypes and age, where Luminal tumors were more often found in elderly patients, while ERBB2, basal-like and unclassified subtypes were more often found in young patients. Molecular subtypes showed a prognostic association with outcome in young patients concerning relapse-free period (RFP) (p = 0.01) and relative survival (RS) (p < 0.001). No statistically significant prognostic effect was found for molecular subtypes in elderly patients (RFP p = 0.5; RS p = 0.1). Additional analyses showed that no molecular subtypes showed a statistically significant difference in outcome for elderly compare to young patients. We have shown that molecular subtypes have a different distribution and prognostic effect in elderly compared to young breast cancer patients, emphasizing the fact that biomarkers may have different distributions and prognostic effects and therefore different implications in elderly compared to their younger counterparts. Our results support the premise that breast cancer clinical behavior is significantly affected by patient age. We suggest that competing risks of death in elderly patients, ER-driven differences and micro-environmental changes in biology are underlying these age-dependent variations in patient prognosis.
    Molecular oncology 04/2014; · 6.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Expression of integrin alpha3beta1 is associated with tumor progression, metastasis, and poor prognosis in several cancers, including breast cancer. Moreover, preclinical studies have revealed important pro-tumorigenic and pro-metastatic functions for this integrin, including tumor growth, survival, invasion, and paracrine induction of angiogenesis. Our previously published work in a preclinical breast cancer model showed that integrin alpha3beta1 promotes expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2/PTGS2), a known driver of breast cancer progression. However, the clinical significance of this regulation was unknown. The objective of the current study was to assess the clinical relevance of the relationship between integrin alpha3beta1 and COX2 by testing for their correlated expression among various forms of human breast cancer.
    BMC Cancer 06/2014; 14(1):459. · 3.33 Impact Factor

Full-text (6 Sources)

View
85 Downloads
Available from
Jun 4, 2014