A Design Requirements Framework for Mobile Learning Environments

Journal of Computers 01/2007; 2(4):1-8.. DOI: 10.4304/jcp.2.4.1-8
Source: DOAJ

ABSTRACT This paper proposes a conceptual framework for mobile learning applications that provides systematic support for mobile learning experience design. It is based on a combination of a game metaphor and several studies of mobile learning contexts. Accounts of four mobile learning projects are used to explore the relationship between the framework and mobile learning design requirements in practice. By applying the framework to previous successful mobile learning implementations, we are better able to understand their key qualities. Similarly, the framework provides forward engineering support for the successful design of future mobile learning systems.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper proposes a conceptual framework for mobile learning applications, that provides systematic support for the design of a mobile continuous learning system. It is based on a combination of the theory of continuous learning, mediated by technology, and several literature studies on mobile learning. It explores how mobile device learning application can be designed with reference to identified theories, factors and tools. The proposed framework provides support for the successful design of mobile continuous learning systems.
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research(IJSER)- impact factor 1.4. 10/2012; Volume 3(Issue 10):367‐374.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study is twofold: 1 to investigate an impact of software quality attributes of a learning management system LMS on students' satisfaction in both the personal computer and the smartphone settings; 2 to examine whether LMS quality factors have different impacts in the smartphone context and the PC context. We explore five quality attributes of LMS capability, usability, performance, reliability and documentation. Data from a survey of 193 students were analysed using ordered logit regression. Findings showed that while only usability and reliability significantly affected user satisfaction in the PC context; all the quality attributes except documentation had a significant influence on user satisfaction in the smartphone setting. We also found that reliability was twice as important to user satisfaction in the smartphone context as in the PC context. The results imply that LMS quality attributes have different impacts on students' satisfaction in the smartphone context from the PC context.
    International Journal of Mobile Communications 03/2014; 12(2):142-159.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Along with advancing mobile technologies and proliferating mobile devices and applications, mobile learning research has gained great momentum in recent years. While there have been review articles summarizing past research, studies identifying mobile learning research priorities based on experts’ latest insights have been lacking. This study employed the Delphi method to obtain a consensus from experts about areas that are most in need of research in mobile learning. An international expert panel participated in a three-round Delphi process involving two cycles of online questionnaires and feedback reports. Participants responded to the question, “What should be the research priorities for the field of mobile learning over the next 5 years?” Ten research categories were identified and ranked in order of priority: 1) teaching and learning strategies; 2) affordances; 3) theory; 4) settings of learning; 5) evaluation/assessment; 6) learners; 7) mobile technologies and interface design; 8) context awareness and augmented reality; 9) infrastructure and management; and 10) country and digital divide. This study also reported expert-generated research statements for each research category and the importance of these research statements rated by the experts. Selected research papers were summarized to help contextualize the discussions of research categories and statements.
    Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 01/2014; 40(2):1-22.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014