Article

Five-year survival in a Program of All-inclusive Care for Elderly compared with alternative institutional and home- and community-based care.

Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences (Impact Factor: 4.98). 03/2010; 65(7):721-6. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glq040
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Community-based services are preferred to institutional care for people requiring long-term care (LTC). States are increasing their Medicaid waiver programs, although Program of All-Inclusive Care For Elderly (PACE)-prepaid, community-based comprehensive care-is available in 31 states. Despite emerging alternatives, little is known about their comparative effectiveness.
For a two-county region of South Carolina, we contrast long-term survival among entrants (n = 2040) to an aged and disabled waiver program, PACE, and nursing homes (NHs), stratifying for risk. Participants were followed for 5 years or until death; those lost to follow-up or surviving less than 5 years as on August 8, 2005 were censored. Analyses included admission descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier curves. To address cohort risk imbalance, we employed an established mortality risk index, which showed external validity in waiver, PACE, and NH cohorts (log-rank tests = 105.42, 28.72, and 52.23, respectively, all p < .001; c-statistics = .67, .58, .65, p < .001).
Compared with waiver (n = 1,018) and NH (n = 468) admissions, PACE participants (n = 554) were older, more cognitively impaired, and had intermediate activities of daily living dependency. PACE mortality risk (72.6% high-to-intermediate) was greater than in waiver (58.8%), and similar to NH (71.6%). Median NH survival was 2.3 years. Median PACE survival was 4.2 years versus 3.5 in waiver (unstratified, log rank = .394; p = .53), but accounting for risk, PACE's advantage is significant (log rank = 5.941 (1); p = .015). Compared with waiver, higher risk admissions to PACE were most likely to benefit (moderate: PACE median survival = 4.7 years vs waiver 3.4; high risk: 3.0 vs 2.0).
Long-term outcomes of LTC alternatives warrant greater research and policy attention.

0 Followers
 · 
211 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Outcomes from a partially integrated model of managed long-term care—The VNS CHOICE program (VCP)—were compared to those from a fully capitated model—the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). A retrospective cohort design examined discharge, morbidity, and functional status for 3,200 individuals over 18 months. Although the two populations were close in average functional status, the PACE sample was sicker and more cognitively impaired. Higher rates of death were found in the PACE program (22 percent vs. 10 percent over 18 months) and a greater likelihood of decline in instrumental activities of daily living; higher functional disability scores (ADLs) predicted discharge in PACE but not in VCP. When propensity score stratification was used to compare like populations, the impact of program enrolment on outcomes became statistically insignificant, suggesting that a partially capitated model performs at least as well as the fully capitated PACE model.
    09/2013; 5(3). DOI:10.1002/wmh3.55
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To measure the rates of hospitalization, readmission, and potentially avoidable hospitalization (PAH) in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). Retrospective study. PACE enrollees. Hospitalization and PAH rates were measured per 1,000 person-years. Readmission was defined as any return to the hospital within 30 days of prior hospital discharge. PAHs were defined as hospitalizations for conditions that previously established criteria have identified as possibly preventable or manageable without hospitalization. Rate of hospitalization was 539/1,000, vs 962/1,000 for dually eligible aged or disabled waiver (ADW) enrollees. Thirty-day readmission was 19.3%, compared with 22.9% for the national population of dually eligible older enrollees. PAH rate was 100/1,000, compared with 250/1,000 for dually eligible ADW enrollees. Considerable variation was observed between sites. PACE enrollees experienced lower rates of hospitalization, readmission, and PAH than similar populations. Variations in hospitalization rates between PACE sites suggest opportunities for quality improvement.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 01/2014; 62(2). DOI:10.1111/jgs.12637 · 4.22 Impact Factor
  • Source

Full-text

Download
32 Downloads
Available from
Jun 4, 2014