Reliability of Zygapophysial Joint Space Measurements Made from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans of Acute Low Back Pain Subjects: Comparison of 2 Statistical Methods

Department of Research, National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, IL 60510, USA.
Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics (Impact Factor: 1.48). 03/2010; 33(3):220-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.01.009
Source: PubMed


This purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of measurements made of the zygapophysial (Z) joint space from the magnetic resonance imaging scans of subjects with acute low back pain using new equipment and 2 different methods of statistical analysis. If found to be reliable, the methods of Z joint measurement can be applied to scans taken before and after spinal manipulation in a larger study of acute low back pain subjects.
Three observers measured the central anterior-to-posterior distance of the left and right L4/L5 and L5/S1 Z joint space from 5 subject scans (20 digitizer measurements, rounded to 0.1 mm) on 2 separate occasions separated by 4 weeks. Observers were blinded to each other and their previous work. Intra- and interobserver reliability was calculated by means of intraclass correlation coefficients and also by mean differences using the methods of Bland and Altman (1986). A mean difference of less than +/-0.4 mm was considered clinically acceptable.
Intraclass correlation coefficients showed intraobserver reliabilities of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.98), 0.83 (0.62-0.92), and 0.92 (0.83-0.96) for each of the 3 observers and interobserver reliabilities of 0.90 (0.82-0.95), 0.79 (0.61-0.90), and 0.84 (0.75-0.90) for the first and second measurements and overall reliability, respectively. The mean difference between the first and second measurements was -0.04 mm (+/-1.96 SD = -0.37 to 0.29), 0.23 (-0.48 to 0.94), 0.25 (-0.24 to 0.75), and 0.15 (-0.44 to 0.74) for each of the 3 observers and the overall agreement, respectively.
Both statistical methods were found to be useful and complementary and showed the measurements to be highly reliable.

Download full-text


Available from: Jerrilyn Cambron, May 05, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reports a technique for studying synchronization. A general mathematical technique is developed for investigating synchronization among many subsystems of a system. The frequency-wavenumber spectrum is explored to derive an objective measure of the synchronization coefficient (SC). The problems concerning the correlation and coherence methods of quantifying synchronization are solved by this technique. The technique is validated by various simulation studies and is then applied to a biological system: the brain, for electroencephalogram (EEG) synchronization. The usefulness of the technique is demonstrated for eight channels of electrocorticogram (ECoG) data recorded from one row of a subdural grid. The technique has the potential of being an objective measure of synchronization in general and of brain synchronization in particular. The principle of the technique may be applied to any system for investigating synchronization
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1997. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE; 01/1997
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zygapophyseal (z) joints (or facet joints) are a potential source of pain in nearly 15-45% of patients suffering from chronic spinal pain. There are no clinical features or imaging techniques pathognomonic for z-joint pain. Blockade of the medial branch of the spinal nerve primary posterior ramus, using fluoroscopic guidance to ensure positioning of the needle tip and low volumes of local anesthetic, are accepted methods for diagnosing z-joint pain. This is based on the assumption that anesthetizing either the facet joint capsule containing the nerve endings or the main branch innervating it would result in complete or significant pain relief. A positive result presumably means that the z-joint is the anatomical structure where pain originates from. These techniques inherently carry high false-positive rates. The current practice of 2 consecutive positive blocks reduces the false-positive rate. However, the criterion of 2 positive blocks results in an increase of the false-negative rate, which could result in withholding radiofrequency ablation of medial branch. Despite limitations of medial branch blockade, these interventions are crucial in guiding decision on performing treatment modalities such as radiofrequency ablation of the medial branch blocks for chronic spinal pain. Diagnostic facet joint and medial branch blocks are safe, valid, and relatively reliable. There is strong evidence that controlled diagnostic blocks distinguish painful from painless facet joints in the diagnostic workup of chronic spinal pain. Standardization and scientific validation of (controlled) diagnostic medical branch blocks are highly needed to identify its real value in clinical practice.
    Techniques in Regional Anesthesia [amp ] Pain Management 01/2011; 15(1):33-38. DOI:10.1053/j.trap.2011.03.003
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: The purpose of this study was to use previously validated methods to quantify and relate 2 phenomena associated with chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT): (1) cavitation and (2) the simultaneous gapping (separation) of the lumbar zygapophyseal (Z) joint spaces. Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, mechanistic clinical trial with blinding. Forty healthy participants (18-30 years old) without a history of low-back pain participated. Seven accelerometers were affixed to the skin overlying the spinous processes of L1 to L5 and the S1 and S2 sacral tubercles. Two additional accelerometers were positioned 3 cm left and right lateral to the L4/L5 interspinous space. Participants were randomized into group 1, side-posture SMT (n = 30), or group 2, side-posture positioning (SPP, n = 10). Cavitations were determined by accelerometer recordings during SMT and SPP (left side = upside for both groups); gapping (gapping difference) was determined by the difference between pre- and postintervention magnetic resonance imaging scan joint space measurements. Results of mean gapping differences were compared. Results: Upside SMT and SPP joints gapped more than downside joints (0.69 vs -0.17 mm, P < .0001). Spinal manipulative therapy upside joints gapped more than SPP upside joints (0.75 vs 0.52 mm, P = .03). Spinal manipulative therapy upside joints gapped more in men than in women (1.01 vs 0.49 mm, P < .002). Overall, joints that cavitated gapped more than those that did not (0.56 vs 0.22 mm, P = .01). No relationship was found between the occurrence of cavitation and gapping with upside joints alone (P = .43). Conclusions: Zygapophyseal joints receiving chiropractic SMT gapped more than those receiving SPP alone; Z joints of men gapped more than those of women, and cavitation indicated that a joint had gapped but not how much a joint had gapped.
    Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 08/2012; 35(8). DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.06.007 · 1.48 Impact Factor
Show more