Treatment of reverse oblique trochanteric femoral fractures with proximal femoral nail

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Goztepe Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
International Orthopaedics (Impact Factor: 2.02). 03/2010; 35(4):595-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1002-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Treatment of reverse oblique trochanteric femoral fractures is still challenging. We present the results of our proximal nailing surgery performed for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures using two lag screws and evaluated the quality of the reduction, operative time, complications and functional status of the patients. Fifteen patients with AO/OTA 31 A-A3 fractures were treated by proximal femoral nailing in our trauma centre. The mean Harris hip score was 74.66 (range 65-96) and the mean Barthel activity score was 15.71 (range 12-20). The mean duration of surgery was 48 minutes and the average consolidation time was 8.6 weeks. No intraoperative complications or postoperative technical failures and no stress shielding as evidenced by the lack of cortical hypertrophy at the level of the tip of the implant were detected. Intramedullary nailing with proximal femoral nails may be a good option in the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.

Download full-text


Available from: Budak Akman, Apr 20, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proximal femural fractures have increased significantly in recent years. The method of treatment can be different and is still widely debated. The Authors report the current evidence concerning the treatment of these fractures. Over the years, various osteosynthesis devices have been developed but the results were often inconsistent and almost never have demonstrated the superiority of one technique over another.
    LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational 07/2013; 27(2). DOI:10.1007/s11639-013-0026-8
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although some effort has been made to develop a 10 kV bipolar device, one of the main challenges to this development is the small RBSOA expected from a 10 kV class device. Based on the good understanding of what exactly determines the RBSOA of a large area bipolar device, in this paper, we stated that a better RBSOA device can be achieved by increase the sustain-mode dynamic avalanche capability of the device. In the punch through case when the device is in sustained mode, an analytical model is also developed based on the concept.
    Industrial Electronics Society, 2005. IECON 2005. 31st Annual Conference of IEEE; 12/2005
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies have recommended the use of cephalo-medullary devices for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen, OTA/AO 31-A3). Both the proximal femoral nail (PFN) and the gamma nail (GN) have shown good outcome results but the results of treatment with the intramedullary hip screw (IMHS) have not been reported in the literature. Our aim was to review the outcomes of these unstable fractures treated with the IMHS implant at our institute. Between 1999 and 2008, 6724 consecutive hip fractures were treated at our institute. There were 115 reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures and 63 of these were treated with the IMHS. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiological records for these fractures treated with the IMHS. Follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 6 years. Amongst the 63 patients treated with the IMHS, 57 (90.5%) fractures were reduced satisfactorily with one poorly positioned hip screw and one breach of the anterior femoral cortex. The mean operative time was 115 min, 22 patients required a blood transfusion and 20 had postoperative medical complications. The major orthopaedic complications included two cases of malrotation, three nonunions and one traumatic periprosthetic fracture with a total failure rate of 7.9%. There were four cases of distal locking bolts breaking or backing out. The 30-day mortality was 6.5%. The clinical and radiological outcomes achieved with the IMHS compare favourably to the results achieved with other cephalo-medullary devices. We consider the long IMHS a good implant for the treatment of these unstable fractures.
    Injury 10/2011; 43(6):817-21. DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.011 · 2.46 Impact Factor
Show more