Treatment of schizophrenia with depot preparations of fluphenazine, haloperidol, and risperidone among inpatients at state-operated psychiatric facilities

Nathan S Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Road, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA.
Schizophrenia Research (Impact Factor: 4.43). 03/2010; 119(1-3):153-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.02.1066
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study aimed to characterize the inpatient utilization of depot antipsychotics.
The characteristics of adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, hospitalized for at least 28 days, and who were prescribed depot antipsychotics were examined from 2004 to 2006 using a database from a large state-operated psychiatric hospital system. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients receiving depot fluphenazine or haloperidol were compared to those prescribed depot risperidone.
We identified 2210 unique patients who initiated treatment with a depot antipsychotic (after receiving oral antipsychotics). Of these, 1484 (67.1%) received depot fluphenazine or haloperidol, and 726 (32.9%) received risperidone as their initial depot antipsychotic. Patients who received depot risperidone did not differ from those receiving depot fluphenazine or haloperidol with regard to demographics, diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, number of comorbid psychiatric or medical diagnoses, or diagnosis of substance abuse. Patients started on depot risperidone during the observation period had a longer length of stay prior to initiation of depot than those started on depot fluphenazine or haloperidol (583 days vs. 237 days, t=5.489, p<.001). Patients who started on depot risperidone were less likely to be discharged on that medication than were patients who started on depot fluphenazine or haloperidol (odds ratio from Cox regression model=0.846 [95% CI 0.745-0.960]).
Patients initiated on depot risperidone had a longer length of stay prior to their first injection and were less likely to be discharged on that medication compared to patients initiated on depot fluphenazine or haloperidol, possibly indicating that patients initiating depot risperidone had a more severe or treatment-resistant course of illness and/or that there were reimbursement barriers for the outpatient utilization of depot risperidone, or that efficacy differences exist between the depot antipsychotics at the doses used in this population.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Long-acting injectable (depot) antipsychotics are one approach in the management of individuals with schizophrenia. Since the introduction of risperidone long-acting injection in 2003, three additional second-generation antipsychotics have become available in a long-acting injectable formulation: paliperidone, olanzapine and aripiprazole. Although these different depot options can help with adherence and thus encourage better treatment outcomes, they differ in terms of specific indications, approved injection sites, needle gauge, injection volume, injection interval, requirements for oral supplementation, availability of prefilled syringes, storage needs and postinjection observation period, as well as potential drug-drug interactions and commonly encountered adverse reactions. After a review of the evidence base, guidance is offered on the appropriate selection among the long-acting injectable formulations of both first and second-generation antipsychotics.
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 07/2013; 13(7):767-83. DOI:10.1586/14737175.2013.811984 · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent investigations have demonstrated a significant reduction of relapse and hospitalization rates associated with the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) in the treatment of schizophrenia. There are only marginal differences in the effectiveness of different specific LAIs. Furthermore, LAIs are comparable to the oral equivalents with respect to effectiveness and side effects. The occurrence of extrapyramidal motor disorders (EPD) is less frequent in second generation (SG) LAIs than in first generation (FG) LAIs. Moreover, specific characteristics of some substances should be considered: In SG-LAIs immediate onset of action is only applicable for olanzapine and paliperidone and FG-LAIs should always be given as a test dose first to assure a general tolerance. All LAIs have a high variability of plasma levels which complicates the dose titration. Last but not least, current research concerning long-term consequences of continuous treatment with antipsychotics and the potentially poorer response to antipsychotics should be considered.
    Der Nervenarzt 10/2013; 85(9). DOI:10.1007/s00115-013-3842-4 · 0.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE The authors compared the efficacy of long-acting injectable antipsychotics and oral antipsychotics on rehospitalization rate of community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia who had frequent admissions. METHODS The cohort study of 14,610 patients was conducted by analyzing the Taiwan National Health Research Institutes data. The patients were divided into groups that received oral antipsychotics (risperidone, a different second-generation antipsychotic, or a first-generation antipsychotic) or long-acting injectable antipsychotics (risperidone, haloperidol, or flupenthixol). RESULTS One-year rehospitalization rates of the final cohort of 10,552 patients were the same for both groups (by long-acting injection, 27.3%; by oral administration, 27.3%). Secondary analysis of groups receiving long-acting injectable medication showed that haloperidol resulted in lower rehospitalization rates (haloperidol, 22.5%; risperidone, 27.1%; and flupenthixol, 29.5%). Patients' characteristics, including age, region, and insurance payments were significantly correlated with the risk of relapse (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS Except for injectable haloperidol, long-acting injectable antipsychotics seem not to be superior to oral antipsychotics in reducing rehospitalization.
    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) 12/2013; 64(12):1259-62. DOI:10.1176/ · 1.99 Impact Factor