Article

Simulation-based mastery learning improves cardiac auscultation skills in medical students.

Augusta Webster, MD Office of Medical Education and Faculty Development, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 03/2010; 25(8):780-5. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1309-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cardiac auscultation is a core clinical skill. However, prior studies show that trainee skills are often deficient and that clinical experience is not a proxy for competence.
To describe a mastery model of cardiac auscultation education and evaluate its effectiveness in improving bedside cardiac auscultation skills.
Untreated control group design with pretest and posttest.
Third-year students who received a cardiac auscultation curriculum and fourth year students who did not.
A cardiac auscultation curriculum consisting of a computer tutorial and a cardiac patient simulator. All third-year students were required to meet or exceed a minimum passing score (MPS) set by an expert panel at posttest.
Diagnostic accuracy with simulated heart sounds and actual patients.
Trained third-year students (n = 77) demonstrated significantly higher cardiac auscultation accuracy compared to untrained fourth year students (n = 31) in assessment of simulated heart sounds (93.8% vs. 73.9%, p < 0.001) and with real patients (81.8% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.003). USMLE scores correlated modestly with a computer-based multiple choice assessment using simulated heart sounds but not with bedside skills on real patients.
A cardiac auscultation curriculum consisting of deliberate practice with a computer-based tutorial and a cardiac patient simulator resulted in improved assessment of simulated heart sounds and more accurate examination of actual patients.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John Butter, Aug 21, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
154 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Oral case presentations are critical for patient care and student assessment. The best method to prepare early medical students for oral presentations is unknown. Aim: We aimed to develop and evaluate a curriculum of on-line learning and deliberate practice to improve pre-clinical students' case presentation skills. Methods: We developed a web-based, interactive curriculum emphasizing conciseness and clinical reasoning. Using a waitlist control design, we randomly assigned groups of second-year students to receive the curriculum in December 2010 or in April 2011. We evaluated their presentations at three time points. We also examined the performance of an untrained class of students as a historical comparison. Results: We evaluated 132 second-year medical students at three time points. After the curriculum, mean scores of the intervention students improved from 60.2% to 70.1%, while scores of the waitlist control students improved less, from 61.8% to 64.5% (p < 0.01 for between-group difference in improvement). Once all students had received the curriculum, mean scores for the intervention and waitlist control students rose to 77.8% and 78.4%, respectively, compared to 68.1% for the untrained comparison students (p < 0.0001 compared to all curriculum students). Conclusion: An on-line curriculum followed by deliberate practice improved students' oral presentation skills.
    Medical Teacher 08/2012; 34(12). DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2012.714879 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The development of a high harmonic gyrotron using a permanent magnet system is presented. On the basis of the design for a high harmonic gyrotron, using an encircling large-orbit electron beam and a permanent magnet system (large orbit gyrotron, LOG), a gyrotron tube has been constructed. The construction of a permanent magnet system has been also completed. The maximum field intensity is a little bit higher than 1 T. This work is being carried out as a collaboration with the Shin-etsu Kagaku Company, Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Science (IAP-RAS) and Institute of Electronics, and Bulgarian Academy of Science (IE-BAS). The gyrotron has already achieved 3rd, 4th and 5th harmonic operations with relatively high efficiency. Corresponding frequencies are 89 GHz, 113 GHz and 138 GHz, respectively. The output power at the 3rd harmonic operation was 2.5 kW and the efficiency 6.3%.
    Physics and Engineering of Microwaves, Millimeter, and Submillimeter Waves, 2004. MSMW 04. The Fifth International Kharkov Symposium on; 07/2004
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores are frequently used by residency program directors when evaluating applicants. The objectives of this report are to study the chain of reasoning and evidence that underlies the use of USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores for postgraduate medical resident selection decisions and to evaluate the validity argument about the utility of USMLE scores for this purpose. This is a research synthesis using the critical review approach. The study first describes the chain of reasoning that underlies a validity argument about using test scores for a specific purpose. It continues by summarizing correlations of USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores and reliable measures of clinical skill acquisition drawn from nine studies involving 393 medical learners from 2005 to 2010. The integrity of the validity argument about using USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores for postgraduate residency selection decisions is tested. The research synthesis shows that USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores are not correlated with reliable measures of medical students', residents', and fellows' clinical skill acquisition. The validity argument about using USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores for postgraduate residency selection decisions is neither structured, coherent, nor evidence based. The USMLE score validity argument breaks down on grounds of extrapolation and decision/interpretation because the scores are not associated with measures of clinical skill acquisition among advanced medical students, residents, and subspecialty fellows. Continued use of USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores for postgraduate medical residency selection decisions is discouraged.
    Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 01/2011; 86(1):48-52. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ffacdb · 3.47 Impact Factor