Article

Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey.
The European Journal of Orthodontics (Impact Factor: 1.53). 04/2010; 32(2):207-13. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp156
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Significant heterogeneity has previously been reported but with no consensus on the prevalence of dental anomalies in subjects with a cleft lip and palate (CLP), thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of various dental anomalies in the upper dental arch in different cleft groups. Diagnostic records, i.e., panoramic, occlusal and periapical films, dental casts, and intra-oral photographs, of 122 subjects (mean age: 14 +/- 5 years; 67 males and 55 females) were grouped as either unilateral left cleft lip and palate (ULCLP), unilateral right cleft lip and palate (URCLP), bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), or cleft palate (CP). Prevalence rates of 15 different dental anomalies were calculated for each group. Wilcoxon's test was used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the number of missing teeth between the right and left sides, in each cleft group. Overall, 96.7 percent of patients were found to have at least one dental anomaly. The most prevalent was agenesis in the anterior region on the cleft side (70.8-97.1 percent). There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of agenesis by cleft and non-cleft sides but only in the ULCLP group (P < 0.001). Significantly higher rates of impaction were observed in the anterior and premolar regions in the CLP groups (2.9-29.2 percent), with the highest rates in the anterior region on the cleft sides. A very high proportion of subjects were found to have at least one dental anomaly. Thus, the management of dental anomalies should be central to the treatment planning process of individuals with a cleft.

1 Bookmark
 · 
104 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of hypodontia in the permanent dentition in a sample of Sudanese patients who sought orthodontic treatment and to compare the results with the reported findings of other populations.
    Journal of orthodontic science. 07/2014; 3(3):63-7.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tooth disorders in the anterior region of the maxilla are very common among patients with cleft lip, alveolar bone and palate. The authors concentrate on dental disorders, erupting problems and root development, specifying dental anomalies - especially regarding the lateral incisor, central incisor and canine. Disorders may relate to the shape of the tooth, its location, size, number and they can be considered separately or together. Anomalies can be affected by many factors, such as orthodontic or surgical treatment, the presence of supernumerary teeth, lack of bone, genetic factors and many others. Each group of cleft is different and the following anomalies can be identified: UCLP (unilateral cleft lip and palate), BCLP (bilateral cleft lip and palate), UCLA (unilateral cleft lip and alveolus) and BCLA (bilateral cleft lip and alveolus). This article is intended to summarise some of the most recent knowledge about tooth disorders in the anterior region of cleft lip and palate patients and present them in an orderly way.
    Developmental period medicine. 01/2014; 18(1):66-69.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Cleft lip and/or palate is the most frequent congenital abnormality occurring in the craniofacial region and is often associated with numerous dental defects such as tooth agenesis, supernumerary teeth, microdontia, taurodontism, crown malformations, or delay in eruption. The prevalence of hypodontia in cleft-affected patients is much higher in comparison with a healthy population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of second premolar hypodontia in patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Material and Methods We performed a retrospective, evaluation of panoramic radiographs and dental casts in the Department of Dentofacial Orthopeadics and Orthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University. Two independent observers evaluated the records of 469 patients with various types of clefts and analyzed dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Results 202 individuals met inclusion criteria. The sample comprised 120 UCLP patients, 38 BCLP patients, 28 CP patients, and 17 CLA patients. Hypodontia in the premolar region was observed in 39 individuals (19.3%). A total number of 58 second premolars were missing, of which 35 were maxillary second premolars (U5) and 23 were mandibular second premolars (L5). Conclusions Estimated hypodontia in the Polish CL/P sample was considerably higher than the hypodontia in permanent dentition reported for a European healthy population. The number of congenitally missing second premolars was higher in the maxillary arch than in the mandibular.
    Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 01/2014; 20:355-60. · 1.22 Impact Factor