Response to Adefovir Depends on Mutation Patterns in Precore Region, Basal Core Promoter and Reverse Transcriptase, and On-Treatment Responses in Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea. drsong @
Intervirology (Impact Factor: 1.68). 03/2010; 53(4):203-10. DOI: 10.1159/000299062
Source: PubMed


In vitro studies showed that mutations in the basal core promoter (BCP) or precore (PC) region restore the replication inefficiency of the lamivudine-resistant mutant. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of molecular characteristics on the antiviral response to adefovir in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
Sixty-six lamivudine-resistant patients who were treated with adefovir monotherapy were studied. Sequences of BCP, PC region and reverse transcriptase were determined before adefovir therapy. In patients with virologic breakthrough, reverse transcriptase sequencing was performed.
The cumulative probabilities of virologic response were 23.3, 46, 52.7 and 59.5% at years 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. PC mutation, the absence of compensatory mutations (rtL80I/V or rtV173L), and a decrease in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA by 3 log or greater at 6 months were independent predictors of virologic response. The cumulative probabilities of virologic breakthrough were 0, 12.9, 30.7 and 44.5% at years 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. BCP mutation and a less than 3 log decrease in serum HBV DNA at 6 months were 2 independent risk factors for virologic breakthrough.
Response to adefovir depends on mutation patterns in the BCP, PC region and reverse transcriptase, and on-treatment decreases in serum HBV DNA in lamivudine-resistant CHB patients.

Download full-text


Available from: Hyun Joo Song, Oct 13, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection remains a major global problem but the recent advances in molecular methods have revolutionized the diagnosis and management of CHB. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitation is the most useful molecular marker for the diagnosis and management of CHB. There is increasing evidence that the clinical outcome and efficacy of antiviral therapy for CHB could vary with the infecting HBV genotype, core promoter and precore mutations. Early identification of drug resistance is imperative in the management of CHB. The molecular methods for HBV DNA quantitation, HBV genotyping, the identification of mutants, genotypic and phenotypic methods for monitoring drug resistance and their utility and limitations for use in the diagnosis and monitoring of CHB are discussed in this article.
    Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 10/2010; 10(7):921-35. DOI:10.1586/erm.10.75 · 3.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT:   Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections caused by precore (PC) or basal core promoter (BCP) mutations are associated with disease progression and complications. PC or BCP mutations may enhance the replication capacity of distinct drug-resistance-associated polymerase mutations, but their effect on adefovir-resistant HBV mutants is unclear. Importantly, BCP mutations were an independent risk factor for virological breakthrough in lamivudine-resistant patients treated with adefovir. We aimed at addressing the functional consequences of PC and BCP mutations on the replication and drug susceptibility of adefovir-resistant HBV mutants. Therefore, HBV constructs with wild type (WT) or adefovir-resistant rtN236T, rtA181V and rtA181T mutations, with or without concomitant PC or BCP mutations, were analysed in vitro using molecular assays. The adefovir-resistant polymerase mutations rtN236T, rtA181V and rtA181T showed a drastically reduced viral replication compared with WT. Interestingly, additional PC or BCP mutations enhanced the reduced replication efficacy of adefovir-resistant constructs and restored HBV replication to WT level. HBV rtA181T mutants displayed abolished hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) secretion, owing to a sW172* stop codon in the overlapping envelope gene. All rtN236T- or rtA181V/T-containing constructs, regardless of concomitant PC or BCP mutations, were resistant to adefovir, but remained susceptible to telbivudine, entecavir and tenofovir. In conclusion, adefovir drug resistance mutations reduced viral replication, which can be significantly increased by additional HBeAg-suppressing PC or BCP mutations. Because increased HBV replication in HBeAg-negative patients has been associated with an unfavourable clinical course, close monitoring appears indispensable during adefovir treatment in HBeAg-negative patients.
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis 02/2013; 20(2):141-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2893.2012.01639.x · 3.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Adefovir (ADV) resistance is more frequent in lamivudine (LMV)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients than in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve patients. The majority of LMV-resistant mutants harbor the rtM204V/I mutation, while a minor fraction harbor the rtA181V/T mutation. We aimed to elucidate the mechanism of the high rate of ADV resistance in LMV-resistant patients during ADV therapy. Methods: We performed a clonal analysis of HBV reverse transcriptase in treatment-naïve (n = 3) and LMV-resistant patients before ADV therapy (n = 14). Dynamic changes in the viral population (n = 9) during ADV therapy were also analyzed. Results: Before ADV therapy, rtA181V/T was observed in 30 of 680 clones (4.4%) from 7 patients with LMV resistance under dominant rt204V/I mutation and in one of 150 clones in treatment-naïve patients. The rtA181V/T mutation was more frequently found in clones from LMV-resistant patients than in treatment-naïve patients (p = 0.029). The rtN236T mutation was not observed in any clone. During ADV therapy, most rtM204V/I mutants were replaced by wild type in all 3 patients without the rtA181V/T mutation and in one patient with the rtA181V/T mutation. Subsequently, wild type was replaced by the rtN236T and/or rtA181V/T mutant. In patients with the rtA181V/T mutation (n = 6), the rtA181V/T mutant overtook the rtM204V/I mutant in 3 of 4 patients with ADV resistance. In 2 patients without ADV resistance, most of the viral population was replaced by wild type by the last follow-up. Conclusion: The high rate of ADV resistance in patients with LMV-resistance might be attributable to preexisting rtA181V/T mutant virus.
    Antiviral Research 10/2014; 112. DOI:10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.09.013 · 3.94 Impact Factor