Article

Glioma proteomics: status and perspectives.

Norlux Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Oncology, Centre de Recherche Public de la Santé (CRP-Santé), Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Journal of proteomics (Impact Factor: 5.07). 03/2010; 73(10):1823-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.03.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT High grade gliomas are the most common brain tumors in adults and their malignant nature makes them the fourth biggest cause of cancer death. Major efforts in neuro-oncology research are needed to reach similar progress in treatment efficacy as that achieved for other cancers in recent years. In addition to the urgent need to identify novel effective drug targets against malignant gliomas, the search for glioma biomarkers and grade specific protein signatures will provide a much needed contribution to diagnosis, prognosis, treatment decision and assessment of treatment response. Over the past years glioma proteomics has been attempted at different levels, including proteome analysis of patient biopsies and bodily fluids, of glioma cell lines and animal models. Here we provide an extensive review of the outcome of these studies in terms of protein identifications (protein numbers and regulated proteins), with an emphasis on the methods used and the limitations of the studies with regard to biomarker discovery. This is followed by a perspective on novel technologies and on the potential future contribution of proteomics in a broad sense to understanding glioma biology.

1 Bookmark
 · 
89 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Meningiomas account for approximately 20% of adult primary intracranial tumours. WHO I meningiomas are the most common and are generally benign, but can progress, recur or transform to WHO II or WHO III grades over many years. A systematic review of multiple independent shotgun proteomic analyses of meningioma was performed to provide insight into underlying disease pathways. Shotgun proteomics has been conducted in seven meningioma related studies but there is considerable variation in aims, methodology, statistical power and the use of control tissue between these studies. Fifteen proteins which are different between WHO I and WHO II meningiomas and nine proteins which are different between WHO II and WHO III meningiomas have been described but without a view of their biological significance. Network analysis of proteins different between WHO I and WHO II meningiomas provided a coherent hypothesis for the involvement of these proteins in meningioma. Western blot analyses of meningioma tissue provided a measure of support for a core component in the network (involving VDAC2, APOA1 and HNF4α) but highlighted intrinsic difficulty of proteomic and biochemical analysis of meningiomas (as a consequence of gross alterations in tissue composition). Systematic review of shotgun proteomics and network analysis provides insight into meningioma pathophysiology despite the many barriers and difficulties that are inherent to this type of study.
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology 01/2011; 104(2):401-10. · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2010, four subtypes (classical, proneural, mesenchymal, and neural) of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were defined by molecular genetic analyses. The objective of this study was to assess whether gliomas, independently of the type and grade, could be subdivided into protein-based subtypes. A tissue microarray (TMA) approach was applied to incorporate tissue samples of low-grade and high-grade gliomas into five TMAs. High expression levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), CD44, c-MER proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MERTK), platelet-derived growth factor receptor α, p53, oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (OLIG2) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 with the R132H mutation were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Glioma could be subdivided into four subtypes by IHC. The majority of the low-grade gliomas were of the proneural subtype, i.e. high p53 expression (63% of grade II). The classical subtype, with high EGFR and low p53 expression, was most common in GBMs (39%), followed by the proneural (29%) and mesenchymal (with high CD44 and MERTK expression) (29%) subtypes, a frequency that is in line with previously published data based on molecular genetics. Assessment of the expression of the five proteins EGFR, CD44, MERTK, p53 and OLIG2 is sufficient for subtyping gliomas, and can be recommended for implementation in clinical practice for both low-grade and high-grade gliomas.
    Histopathology 02/2014; 64(3):365-79. · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults and, despite advances in the understandings of glioma pathogenesis in the genetic era, they are still ineradicable, justifying the need to develop more reliable diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for this malignancy. Because changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are suggested to be capable of sensitively reflecting pathological processes, e.g., neoplastic conditions, in the central nervous system, CSF has been deemed a valuable source for potential biomarkers screening in this era of proteomics. This systematic review focused on the proteomic analysis of glioma CSF that has been published to date and identified a total of 19 differentially expressed proteins. Further functional and protein-protein interaction assessments were performed by using Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER) website and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software, which revealed several important protein networks (e.g., IL-6/STAT-3) and four novel focus proteins (IL-6, galanin (GAL), HSPA5, and WNT4) that might be involved in glioma pathogenesis. The concentrations of these focus proteins were subsequently determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in an independent set of CSF and tumor cyst fluid (CF) samples. Specifically, glioblastoma (GBM) CF had significantly lower GAL, HSPA5, and WNT4 levels than CSF from different grades of glioma. In contrast, IL-6 level was significantly higher in GBM CF when compared with CSF and, among different CSF groups, was highest in GBM CSF. Therefore, these candidate protein biomarkers, identified from both the literatures and in silico analysis, may have potentials in clinical diagnosis, prognosis evaluation, treatment response monitoring, and novel therapeutic targets identification for patients with glioma.
    Neurosurgical Review 05/2014; · 1.97 Impact Factor