Imaging Presentation of Venous Thrombosis in Patients With Cancer

Department of Radiology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
American Journal of Roentgenology (Impact Factor: 2.73). 04/2010; 194(4):1099-108. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2501
Source: PubMed


OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the imaging of venous thrombosis in patients with cancer. CONCLUSION: Multiple imaging techniques have the capacity to display thrombosis accurately. The optimal choice is dictated by the location and duration of symptoms and by the availability of imaging techniques. Peripheral and superficial thrombi are best managed with ultrasound, whereas central thrombi require CT or MRI. If CT and MRI are contraindicated, flow studies are appropriate. FDG PET/CT appropriately shows venous thrombosis and might play a prominent role in the future.

Download full-text


Available from: Faisal Khosa, Oct 13, 2015
1 Follower
41 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hemorrhoids are very common in adults. The data regarding the incidence of high 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose (FDG) uptake in hemorrhoids is incomplete. In this study, we evaluated FDG uptake in hemorrhoids and calculated the rate of high FDG uptake in these lesions. One hundred and seventy six subjects who undertook whole body FDG-PET for health screening examination were investigated retrospectively. All patients had colonoscopy and 156 subjects were found to have hemorrhoids and 20 had no hemorrhoids. Quantitative analysis of FDG uptake in the anal region was performed by calculating the maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)). The SUV(max) ranged from 1.8 to 4.1 (2.8 ± 0.6) for normal subjects and ranged from 1.4 to 8.3 (2.9 ± 0.8) for patients with hemorrhoids. No statistical difference was noted between these two groups using a Student's t-tests. If the highest SUV(max), which was 4.1 in normal subjects, was used as a cutoff, 5.1% (8/156) hemorrhoid patients had a SUV(max) greater than 4.1. Hemorrhoids can be one possible cause of focal high FDG uptake in the rectum.
    Abdominal Imaging 12/2010; 36(5):548-51. DOI:10.1007/s00261-010-9670-0 · 1.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A 24-year-old woman presented with progressive pain in the left groin and left buttock for 4 months. The whole-body FDG PET/CT and MRI of the pelvis revealed a left pelvic mass and venous thrombosis in the left common iliac vein, inferior vena cava, and right atrium. Chondrosarcoma with venous tumor invasion of the inferior vena cava to the right atrium was documented surgically.
    Clinical nuclear medicine 10/2011; 36(10):e142-5. DOI:10.1097/RLU.0b013e31821a2926 · 3.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the imaging findings of vascular tumors. CONCLUSION: Tumors of the vasculature are a pervasive disease entity consisting of both primary and metastatic lesions. Cross-sectional imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and delineation of the extent of this entity. Recognition of the characteristic imaging presentation of each tumor at CT and MRI can facilitate prompt diagnosis and accurate staging.
    American Journal of Roentgenology 03/2012; 198(3):700-4. DOI:10.2214/AJR.11.6661 · 2.73 Impact Factor
Show more