Effects of smoking and smoking cessation on endothelial function: 1-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial.

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 15.34). 03/2010; 55(18):1988-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine whether smoking cessation improves flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery.
The long-term effects of continued smoking and smoking cessation on endothelial function have not been described previously.
This was a 1-year, prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of the effects of 5 smoking cessation pharmacotherapies. FMD was measured by B-mode ultrasonography before and 1 year after the target smoking cessation date. Cessation was verified by exhaled carbon monoxide levels. DeltaFMD was compared among study arms and between subjects who successfully quit smoking and those who continued to smoke. Predictors of baseline FMD and DeltaFMD were identified by multivariable regression.
The 1,504 current smokers (58% female, 84% white) were 44.7 +/- 11.1 years of age and smoked 21.4 +/- 8.9 cigarettes/day. Baseline FMD was similar in each treatment arm (p = 0.499) and was predicted by BA diameter (p < 0.001), reactive hyperemia blood flow (p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.001), and carbon monoxide (p = 0.012) levels. After 1 year, 36.2% quit smoking. FMD increased by 1% (6.2 +/- 4.4% to 7.2 +/- 4.2%) after 1 year (p = 0.005) in those who quit, but did not change (p = 0.643) in those who continued to smoke. Improved FMD among quitters remained significant (p = 0.010) after controlling for changes in brachial artery diameter, reactive hyperemia, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the presence of a home smoking ban.
Despite weight gain, smoking cessation leads to prolonged improvements in endothelial function, which may mediate part of the reduced cardiovascular disease risk observed after smoking cessation. (Smoking Cessation Medications: Efficacy, Mechanisms and Algorithms; NCT00332644).

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Although smoking is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, little is known about the impact of smoking on long-term outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods In 426 consecutive patients with nonvalvular AF (mean age, 66 years; 307 men; mean follow-up, 5.8 ± 3.2 years), clinical variables including smoking status, CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc score, incidences of cardiovascular events (stroke, myocardial infarction, or admission for heart failure), bleeding, and mortality were determined. Results Incidences of intracranial bleeding (0.7% vs 0.1%/year, p < 0.01), all-cause mortality (4.9% vs 2.6%/year, p < 0.01), and death from stroke (0.8% vs 0.2%/year, p < 0.05) were higher in patients with history of smoking than in those without it. Incidence of intracranial bleeding was significantly higher in persistent smokers than in non-persistent smokers (1.2% vs 0.2%/year, p < 0.01). History of smoking predicted all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR), 2.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7–4.5; p < 0.01] and death from stroke (HR 4.7; 95% CI 1.0–22.3; p < 0.05) independent of age, antithrombotic treatment, CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Persistent smoking predicted intracranial bleeding (HR 4.4; 95% CI 1.1–17.6; p < 0.05) independent of age and antithrombotic treatment. Conclusions Smoking status, independent of age, antithrombotic treatment, and clinical risk factors, predicted long-term adverse outcomes including bleeding events in patients with nonvalvular AF. There might be an obvious impact of persistent smoking on intracranial bleeding.
    Journal of Cardiology 08/2014; · 2.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The aim of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is to temporarily replace much of the nicotine from cigarettes to reduce motivation to smoke and nicotine withdrawal symptoms, thus easing the transition from cigarette smoking to complete abstinence. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this review were: To determine the effect of NRT compared to placebo in aiding smoking cessation, and to consider whether there is a difference in effect for the different forms of NRT (chewing gum, transdermal patches, oral and nasal sprays, inhalers and tablets/lozenges) in achieving abstinence from cigarettes. To determine whether the effect is influenced by the dosage, form and timing of use of NRT; the intensity of additional advice and support offered to the smoker; or the clinical setting in which the smoker is recruited and treated. To determine whether combinations of NRT are more likely to lead to successful quitting than one type alone. To determine whether NRT is more or less likely to lead to successful quitting compared to other pharmacotherapies. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register for papers mentioning 'NRT' or any type of nicotine replacement therapy in the title, abstract or keywords. Date of most recent search July 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials in which NRT was compared to placebo or to no treatment, or where different doses of NRT were compared. We excluded trials which did not report cessation rates, and those with follow-up of less than six months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data in duplicate on the type of participants, the dose, duration and form of nicotine therapy, the outcome measures, method of randomization, and completeness of follow-up. The main outcome measure was abstinence from smoking after at least six months of follow-up. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence for each trial, and biochemically validated rates if available. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for each study. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analysis using a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 150 trials; 117 with over 50,000 participants contributed to the primary comparison between any type of NRT and a placebo or non-NRT control group. The risk ratio (RR) of abstinence for any form of NRT relative to control was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53 to 1.68). The pooled RRs for each type were 1.49 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.60, 55 trials) for nicotine gum; 1.64 (95% CI 1.52 to 1.78, 43 trials) for nicotine patch; 1.95 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.36, 6 trials) for oral tablets/lozenges; 1.90 (95% CI 1.36 to 2.67, 4 trials) for nicotine inhaler; and 2.02 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.73, 4 trials) for nicotine nasal spray. One trial of oral spray had an RR of 2.48 (95% CI 1.24 to 4.94). The effects were largely independent of the duration of therapy, the intensity of additional support provided or the setting in which the NRT was offered. The effect was similar in a small group of studies that aimed to assess use of NRT obtained without a prescription. In highly dependent smokers there was a significant benefit of 4 mg gum compared with 2 mg gum, but weaker evidence of a benefit from higher doses of patch. There was evidence that combining a nicotine patch with a rapid delivery form of NRT was more effective than a single type of NRT (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.51, 9 trials). The RR for NRT used for a short period prior to the quit date was 1.18 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.40, 8 trials), just missing statistical significance, though the efficacy increased when we pooled only patch trials and when we removed one trial in which confounding was likely. Five studies directly compared NRT to a non-nicotine pharmacotherapy, bupropion; there was no evidence of a difference in efficacy (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.18). A combination of NRT and bupropion was more effective than bupropion alone (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.45, 4 trials). Adverse effects from using NRT are related to the type of product, and include skin irritation from patches and irritation to the inside of the mouth from gum and tablets. There is no evidence that NRT increases the risk of heart attacks. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: All of the commercially available forms of NRT (gum, transdermal patch, nasal spray, inhaler and sublingual tablets/lozenges) can help people who make a quit attempt to increase their chances of successfully stopping smoking. NRTs increase the rate of quitting by 50 to 70%, regardless of setting. The effectiveness of NRT appears to be largely independent of the intensity of additional support provided to the individual. Provision of more intense levels of support, although beneficial in facilitating the likelihood of quitting, is not essential to the success of NRT.
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 01/2012; · 5.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the effect of smoking on vascular response to transradial coronary angiography (TCA).
    American journal of cardiovascular disease. 01/2014; 4(2):47-57.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 26, 2014