Article

Adherence and outcomes associated with copayment burden in schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey.

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ, USA.
Journal of Medical Economics 03/2010; 13(2):185-92. DOI: 10.3111/13696991003723023
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Assess the association of schizophrenia patients' perceived copayment burden with medication adherence and outcomes.
Patients with schizophrenia (aged 18+) completed self-reported questionnaires. Analyses included those currently using a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) with no exposure to clozapine or depot formulation antipsychotics. Adherence was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS). Outcomes included emergency room (ER) use, hospitalization, attempted suicide, missed work due to health, and experiencing severe psychological distress. Logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics, health characteristics, psychotropic medication use, and insurance status.
Of 351 schizophrenia patients, 39% perceived copayment burden. These patients were less than half as likely to have complete adherence [OR = 0.427; 95% CI:0.257, 0.711; p = 0.001] Copayment burden was associated with greater likelihood of ER use, [OR = 2.157; 95% CI:(1.322, 3.520); p = 0.002], hospitalization [OR = 2.512; 95% CI: (1.475, 4.277); p < 0.001], attempted suicide[OR = 2.385; 95% CI: (1.156, 4.920); p = 0.019], severe psychological distress [OR = 1.833; 95% CI:1.092, 3.075; p = 0.022] and greater likelihood of missing work [OR = 7.193; 95% CI: 2.554, 20.256; p < 0.001].
Copayment burden is associated with poorer medication adherence and outcomes. Formularies that reduce copayment burden for SGAs may positively affect medication adherence and outcomes among schizophrenia patients.
Patient data were self-reported, which may have introduced additional bias in the study measures. Also, the use of a cross-sectional design precludes causal inference and the use of the current sampling methodology (both interview and Internet panel) might impact the ability to generalize the results to the broader population.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
155 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Non-adherence by dose omission is common and deleterious to outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), but covert dose reduction (CDR) remains unexplored.
    Journal of Crohn s and Colitis 09/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.013 · 3.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonadherence with medication occurs in all chronic medical disorders. It is a particular challenge in schizophrenia due to the illness's association with social isolation, stigma, and comorbid substance misuse, plus the effect of symptom domains on adherence, including positive and negative symptoms, lack of insight, depression, and cognitive impairment. Nonadherence lies on a spectrum, is often covert, and is underestimated by clinicians, but affects more than one third of patients with schizophrenia per annum. It increases the risk of relapse, rehospitalization, and self-harm, increases inpatient costs, and lowers quality of life. It results from multiple patient, clinician, illness, medication, and service factors, but a useful distinction is between intentional and unintentional nonadherence. There is no gold standard approach to the measurement of adherence as all methods have pros and cons. Interventions to improve adherence include psychoeducation and other psychosocial interventions, antipsychotic long-acting injections, electronic reminders, service-based interventions, and financial incentives. These overlap, all have some evidence of effectiveness, and the intervention adopted should be tailored to the individual. Psychosocial interventions that utilize combined approaches seem more effective than unidimensional approaches. There is increasing interest in electronic reminders and monitoring systems to enhance adherence, eg, Short Message Service text messaging and real-time medication monitoring linked to smart pill containers or an electronic ingestible event marker. Financial incentives to enhance antipsychotic adherence raise ethical issues, and their place in practice remains unclear. Simple pragmatic strategies to improve medication adherence include shared decision-making, regular assessment of adherence, simplification of the medication regimen, ensuring that treatment is effective and that side effects are managed, and promoting a positive therapeutic alliance and good communication between the clinician and patient. These elements remain essential for all patients, not least for the small minority where vulnerability and risk issue dictate that compulsory treatment is necessary to ensure adherence.
    Patient Related Outcome Measures 01/2014; 5:43-62. DOI:10.2147/PROM.S42735
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In patients with schizophrenia, nonadherence to prescribed medications increases the risk of patient relapse and hospitalization, key contributors to the costs associated with treatment. The objectives of this review were to evaluate the impact of nonadherence to pharmacotherapy in patients with schizophrenia as it relates to health care professionals, particularly social workers, and to identify effective team approaches to supporting patients based on studies assessing implementation of assertive community treatment teams.
    Patient Preference and Adherence 05/2014; 8:701-714. DOI:10.2147/PPA.S59371 · 1.49 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
145 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014