Self-development groups reduce medical school stress: a controlled intervention study

Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Psychiatry, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
BMC Medical Education (Impact Factor: 1.41). 03/2010; 10:23. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-23
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT High stress levels and mental health problems are common among medical students and there is a lack of studies on group interventions that aim to reduce such distress during medical school.
A full class of students (n = 129) participated in group sessions during their third year of medical school in Bergen, Norway. The subsequent third-year class (n = 152) acted as control group, in order to create a quasi-experimental design. Two types of group intervention sessions were offered to the first class. One option was self-development groups led by trained group psychotherapists. Alternatively, students could choose discussion groups that focused on themes of special relevance to doctors, led by experienced general practitioners. The intervention comprised of 12 weekly group sessions each lasting 90 minutes. Data were gathered before the intervention (T1), and three months post intervention (T2). Distress was measured using the Perceived Medical School Stress (PMSS) and Symptom Check List-5 (SCL-5) assessments.
The intervention group showed a significant reduction in PMSS over the observation period. The subsequent year control group stayed on the same PMSS levels over the similar period. The intervention was a significant predictor of PMSS reduction in a multiple regression analysis adjusted for age and sex, beta = -1.93 (-3.47 to -0.38), P = 0.02. When we analysed the effects of self-development and discussion groups with the control group as reference, self-development group was the only significant predictor of PMSS reduction, beta = -2.18 (-4.03 to -0.33), P = 0.02. There was no interaction with gender in our analysis. This implicates no significant difference between men and women concerning the effect of the self-development group. There was no reduction in general mental distress (SCL-5) over this period.
A three-month follow-up showed that the intervention had a positive effect on perceived medical school stress among the students, and further analyses showed this was due to participation in self-development groups.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines the association between expectant parents’ psychological distress and children’s development at 36 months old. This is a prospective population study based on the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study, N = 31,663. Logistic regression models were used to assess whether high scores (cutoff ≥2.00) on the symptom checklist-5 in parents predicted higher levels (cutoff ≥90 percentile) of developmental problems in their children. The risk of emotional and behavioral problems were significantly increased in children when both parents were affected by psychological distress during pregnancy, fully adjusted OR 2.35 (95 % CI 1.36, 4.07) and OR 2.65 (96 % CI 1.564.48), respectively. The risk was higher when mothers reported high level of psychological distress than when only the fathers did, but the risk of emotional difficulties in children was highest when both parents presented high levels of psychological distress, indicating an additive effect of parental psychological distress.
    Child Psychiatry and Human Development 12/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10578-014-0527-6 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate stressors, coursework stress and coping strategies such as wishful thinking and problem solving coping among medical students. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a private medical school of Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 240 students were selected through random sampling technique from first year to fourth year medical students. Validated questionnaires were used for data collection. Data was entered on SPSS version 20. Descriptive analysis was performed to report the frequency of stressors. Pearson correlation test was performed to test correlation between coursework stress and coping, independent t test was performed to test the mean difference of academic stressors on the basis of gender and ANOVA was performed to test the mean difference of stress and coping strategies scores between years of study, p-value less than 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: The mean (SD) age of the students was 20.98 (1.46) years. Majority of the students were females. In general, medical students frequently used wishful thinking and problem solving as coping strategies. Academic related stressors (mean=2.48, SD =0.82) were found to be predominant in all the years of study followed by social related stressor. Conclusion: Student who were frequently using the coping techniques seem to experience high level of coursework stress. Third year medical students were seen to be more stressed out, followed by fourth year students. Least amount of stress was seen in the first year. Academic requirements were found to be the most prevalent stressor.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Securing a place in medical school is extremely difficult-students who are successful all have similar high levels of academic achievement. So why do some students, and not others, have difficulty with the course, and in some cases, leave the programme? Studies on medical school attrition offer valuable insight into why medical students under-perform. Identification of the 'at-risk' student can trigger additional support and early remediation, helping some students remain in their chosen profession.

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 23, 2014