A new perspective on neural tube defects: Folic acid and microRNA misexpression

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
genesis (Impact Factor: 2.04). 01/2010; 48(5):282-94. DOI: 10.1002/dvg.20623
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Neural tube defects (NTDs) are the second most common birth defects in the United States. It is well known that folic acid supplementation decreases about 70% of all NTDs, although the mechanism by which this occurs is still relatively unknown. The current theory is that folic acid deficiency ultimately leads to depletion of the methyl pool, leaving critical genes unmethylated, and, in turn, their improper expression leads to failure of normal neural tube development. Recently, new studies in human cell lines have shown that folic acid deficiency and DNA hypomethylation can lead to misexpression of microRNAs (miRNAs). Misexpression of critical miRNAs during neural development may lead to a subtle effect on neural gene regulation, causing the sometimes mild to severely debilitating range of phenotypes exhibited in NTDs. This review seeks to cohesively integrate current information regarding folic acid deficiency, methylation cycles, neural development, and miRNAs to propose a potential model of NTD formation. In addition, we have examined the relevant gene pathways and miRNAs that are predicted to affect them, and based on our investigation, we have devised a basic template of experiments for exploring the idea that miRNA misregulation may be linked to folic acid deficiency and NTDs.


Available from: G. Ian Gallicano, Oct 02, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neural tube defects (NTDs) are one of the most common types of birth defects with a complex etiology. We have previously profiled serum metabolites of pregnant women in Lvliang prefecture, Shanxi Province of China, which revealed distinct metabolic changes in pregnant women with NTDs outcome. Here we present a metabonomics study of human placentas of 144 pregnant women with normal pregnancy outcome and 115 pregnant women affected with NTDs recruited from four rural counties (Pingding, Xiyang, Taigu, and Zezhou) of Shanxi Province, the area with the highest prevalence worldwide. A panel of 19 metabolites related to one-carbon metabolism was also quantitatively determined. We observed obvious differences in global metabolic profiles and one-carbon metabolism among three subtypes of NTDs, anencephaly (Ane), spina bifida (SB), and Ane complicated with SB (Ane & SB) via mass-spectrometry-based metabonomics approach. Disturbed carbohydrate, amino acid, lipid, and nucleic acid metabolism were identified. Placental transport of amino acids might be depressed in Ane and Ane & SB group. Deficiency of choline contributes to Ane and Ane & SB pathogenesis via different metabolic pathways. The formation of NTDs seemed to be weakly related to folates. The metabonomic analysis reveals that the physiological and biochemical processes of the three subtypes of NTDs might be different and the subtype condition should be considered for the future investigation of NTDs.
    Journal of Proteome Research 01/2014; 13(2). DOI:10.1021/pr4009805 · 5.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anencephaly is one of the most serious forms of neural tube defects (NTDs), a group of congenital central nervous system (CNS) malformations. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in diverse biological processes via the post-transcriptional regulation of target mRNAs. Although miRNAs play important roles in the development of mammalian CNS, their function in human NTDs remains unknown. Using a miRNA microarray, we identified a unique expression profile in fetal anencephalic brain tissues, characterized by 70 upregulated miRNAs (ratio ≥2) and 7 downregulated miRNAs (ratio ≤0.5) compared with healthy human samples. Ten miRNAs with altered expression were selected from the microarray findings for validation with real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. We found that in anencephalic tissues, miR-22, miR-23a, miR-34a, miR-103, miR-125a, miR-132, miR-134, miR-138, and miR-185 were significantly upregulated, while miR-149 was significantly downregulated. Furthermore, 459 potential target genes within the validated miRNAs were revealed using combined four target prediction algorithms in the human genome, and subsequently analyzed with the Molecule Annotation System 3.0. A total of 119 target genes were ultimately identified, including those involved in 22 singular annotations (i.e., transcription, signal transduction, and cell cycle) and 55 functional pathways [i.e., mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, and actin cytoskeleton regulation]. Six target genes (HNRPU, JAG1, FMR1, EGR3, RUNX1T1, and NDEL1) were chosen as candidate genes and associated with congenital birth abnormalities of the brain structure. Our results, therefore, suggest that miRNA maladjustment mainly contributes to the etiopathogenesis of anencephaly via the MAPK signaling pathway.
    Genetics and molecular research: GMR 01/2014; 13(1):1015-29. DOI:10.4238/2014.February.20.3 · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The protonation equilibria of vitamin B9 (folic acid) was studied at 298.15 K in a different water–dioxane mixtures [100 wdioxane = 20 %, 40 %, 60 %, and 80 %] with an ionic strength of 0.15 mol·dm–3 NaNO3. The influence of dioxane content on the protonation processes was explained. Also, four protonation constants have been determined in 60 % dioxane with an ionic strengths of (0.15, 0.20, 0.25, and 0.30) mol·dm–3 NaNO3 using the pH-potentiometric technique. HYPERQUAD 2008, a program based on nonlinear least-squares curve fitting was used to determine these four stepwise protonation constants of folic acid from the analysis of pH-potentiometric data. From the determined protonation constants, the representative folate species distribution diagrams were provided by HYSS 2009 program and discussed.
    Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 07/2013; 58(8):2219–2223. DOI:10.1021/je4002569 · 2.05 Impact Factor